{"title":"超声心动图组织多普勒和速度矢量成像评价正常人左室扭转和解扭率:两种方法的比较","authors":"M. Karvandi","doi":"10.5812/acvi.18612","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"I have read \"Echocardiographic Assessment of Left Ventricular Twisting and Untwisting Rate in Normal Subjects by Tissue Doppler and Velocity Vector Imaging: Comparison of Two Methods\" with great interest and congratulate the authors on their comprehensive and very balanced overview of recent studies on the left ventricular (LV) deformation analysis (1). However, there are three incorrect aspects that in my opinion needs clarification. Frist, the authors calculated the LV rotation by integrating the rotational velocity, determined from the DTI velocities of the septal and lateral regions, and correcting [R (t)] for the LV radius over time. R (t) is incorrect in Equation 1; it should be improved to:","PeriodicalId":429543,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Cardiovascular Imaging","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular twisting and untwisting rate in normal subjects by tissue doppler and velocity vector imaging: Comparison of two methods\",\"authors\":\"M. Karvandi\",\"doi\":\"10.5812/acvi.18612\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"I have read \\\"Echocardiographic Assessment of Left Ventricular Twisting and Untwisting Rate in Normal Subjects by Tissue Doppler and Velocity Vector Imaging: Comparison of Two Methods\\\" with great interest and congratulate the authors on their comprehensive and very balanced overview of recent studies on the left ventricular (LV) deformation analysis (1). However, there are three incorrect aspects that in my opinion needs clarification. Frist, the authors calculated the LV rotation by integrating the rotational velocity, determined from the DTI velocities of the septal and lateral regions, and correcting [R (t)] for the LV radius over time. R (t) is incorrect in Equation 1; it should be improved to:\",\"PeriodicalId\":429543,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of Cardiovascular Imaging\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-05-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of Cardiovascular Imaging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5812/acvi.18612\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Cardiovascular Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5812/acvi.18612","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular twisting and untwisting rate in normal subjects by tissue doppler and velocity vector imaging: Comparison of two methods
I have read "Echocardiographic Assessment of Left Ventricular Twisting and Untwisting Rate in Normal Subjects by Tissue Doppler and Velocity Vector Imaging: Comparison of Two Methods" with great interest and congratulate the authors on their comprehensive and very balanced overview of recent studies on the left ventricular (LV) deformation analysis (1). However, there are three incorrect aspects that in my opinion needs clarification. Frist, the authors calculated the LV rotation by integrating the rotational velocity, determined from the DTI velocities of the septal and lateral regions, and correcting [R (t)] for the LV radius over time. R (t) is incorrect in Equation 1; it should be improved to: