不同CNN模型在印度道路数据集上的性能比较

Abhishek Mukhopadhyay, P. Biswas, Ayush Agarwal, Imon Mukherjee
{"title":"不同CNN模型在印度道路数据集上的性能比较","authors":"Abhishek Mukhopadhyay, P. Biswas, Ayush Agarwal, Imon Mukherjee","doi":"10.1145/3338472.3338480","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recent advancement in the field of computer vision and development of Deep Neural Network based object detection led researchers and industries to focus on autonomous vehicles. This paper aims to find how accurately previously proposed CNN architectures detect on-road obstacles in Indian road scenarios in the context of autonomous vehicle. We have compared three different convolution neural networks trained with COCO dataset for detecting autorickshaws in Indian road. We undertook statistical hypothesis testing to find effect of these three models, i.e. YOLOv3, Mask R-CNN, and RetinaNet on detection accuracy rate. While measuring accuracy, we have noted that detection accuracy rate of RetinaNet is significantly better than other two CNN architectures. Although there is no significant difference between other two networks in context of detection rate. The accuracy rate shows the performance of RetinaNet invariant to autorickshaws' color and shape, and different climatic and complex background scenarios.","PeriodicalId":142573,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Graphics and Signal Processing","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance Comparison of Different CNN models for Indian Road Dataset\",\"authors\":\"Abhishek Mukhopadhyay, P. Biswas, Ayush Agarwal, Imon Mukherjee\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3338472.3338480\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Recent advancement in the field of computer vision and development of Deep Neural Network based object detection led researchers and industries to focus on autonomous vehicles. This paper aims to find how accurately previously proposed CNN architectures detect on-road obstacles in Indian road scenarios in the context of autonomous vehicle. We have compared three different convolution neural networks trained with COCO dataset for detecting autorickshaws in Indian road. We undertook statistical hypothesis testing to find effect of these three models, i.e. YOLOv3, Mask R-CNN, and RetinaNet on detection accuracy rate. While measuring accuracy, we have noted that detection accuracy rate of RetinaNet is significantly better than other two CNN architectures. Although there is no significant difference between other two networks in context of detection rate. The accuracy rate shows the performance of RetinaNet invariant to autorickshaws' color and shape, and different climatic and complex background scenarios.\",\"PeriodicalId\":142573,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Graphics and Signal Processing\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Graphics and Signal Processing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3338472.3338480\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Graphics and Signal Processing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3338472.3338480","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

计算机视觉领域的最新进展和基于深度神经网络的目标检测的发展使研究人员和行业关注自动驾驶汽车。本文旨在找出在自动驾驶汽车背景下,以前提出的CNN架构在印度道路场景中检测道路障碍物的准确性。我们比较了用COCO数据集训练的三种不同的卷积神经网络,用于检测印度道路上的机动车辆。我们对YOLOv3、Mask R-CNN、RetinaNet这三种模型对检测准确率的影响进行了统计假设检验。在测量精度时,我们注意到retanet的检测准确率明显优于其他两种CNN架构。尽管其他两种网络在检出率方面没有显著差异。准确率显示了retanet对机动三轮车颜色、形状、不同气候和复杂背景场景的不变性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Performance Comparison of Different CNN models for Indian Road Dataset
Recent advancement in the field of computer vision and development of Deep Neural Network based object detection led researchers and industries to focus on autonomous vehicles. This paper aims to find how accurately previously proposed CNN architectures detect on-road obstacles in Indian road scenarios in the context of autonomous vehicle. We have compared three different convolution neural networks trained with COCO dataset for detecting autorickshaws in Indian road. We undertook statistical hypothesis testing to find effect of these three models, i.e. YOLOv3, Mask R-CNN, and RetinaNet on detection accuracy rate. While measuring accuracy, we have noted that detection accuracy rate of RetinaNet is significantly better than other two CNN architectures. Although there is no significant difference between other two networks in context of detection rate. The accuracy rate shows the performance of RetinaNet invariant to autorickshaws' color and shape, and different climatic and complex background scenarios.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Analyzing Eye Gaze of Users with Learning Disability Applying Modified SHA256 on Blockchain using Challenge Response and Off-chain Signatures Patterns Snake Image Classification using Siamese Networks Research on Secure Routing Technology Based on NDN for VANET Iterative Broad Null Steering
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1