敏捷安全关键系统开发中的质量保证

T. McBride, Marion Lepmets
{"title":"敏捷安全关键系统开发中的质量保证","authors":"T. McBride, Marion Lepmets","doi":"10.1109/QUATIC.2016.016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this position paper we examine how safety could be assured when increasingly complex systems are developed using agile software development methods. We first discuss the source and nature of complexity in software systems and how a probe – sense – learn approach recommended by the Cynefin Framework is appropriate for designing complex systems and a sense – analyse – learn approach is appropriate for developing a complicated system whose design has been determined. We then examine how quality assurance is incorporated into agile software development before pointing out that those characteristics of a self-managed team that produce so many benefits for software development of complex systems whose solution evolves with problem understanding, are also vulnerable to confirmation bias. This suggests that for safety critical system development, software systems developed by agile teams will need verification and validation by independent parties. We review current quality management practices for medical device software development before discussing how our earlier findings could be adopted into safety critical software quality management.","PeriodicalId":157671,"journal":{"name":"2016 10th International Conference on the Quality of Information and Communications Technology (QUATIC)","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quality Assurance in Agile Safety-Critical Systems Development\",\"authors\":\"T. McBride, Marion Lepmets\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/QUATIC.2016.016\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this position paper we examine how safety could be assured when increasingly complex systems are developed using agile software development methods. We first discuss the source and nature of complexity in software systems and how a probe – sense – learn approach recommended by the Cynefin Framework is appropriate for designing complex systems and a sense – analyse – learn approach is appropriate for developing a complicated system whose design has been determined. We then examine how quality assurance is incorporated into agile software development before pointing out that those characteristics of a self-managed team that produce so many benefits for software development of complex systems whose solution evolves with problem understanding, are also vulnerable to confirmation bias. This suggests that for safety critical system development, software systems developed by agile teams will need verification and validation by independent parties. We review current quality management practices for medical device software development before discussing how our earlier findings could be adopted into safety critical software quality management.\",\"PeriodicalId\":157671,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2016 10th International Conference on the Quality of Information and Communications Technology (QUATIC)\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2016 10th International Conference on the Quality of Information and Communications Technology (QUATIC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/QUATIC.2016.016\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 10th International Conference on the Quality of Information and Communications Technology (QUATIC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/QUATIC.2016.016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

在这篇立场文件中,我们将研究如何在使用敏捷软件开发方法开发日益复杂的系统时确保安全。我们首先讨论了软件系统中复杂性的来源和本质,以及Cynefin框架推荐的探测-感知-学习方法如何适用于设计复杂系统,而感知-分析-学习方法如何适用于开发设计已确定的复杂系统。然后,我们研究了如何将质量保证纳入敏捷软件开发,然后指出自我管理团队的那些特征,这些特征为复杂系统的软件开发带来了如此多的好处,其解决方案随着问题理解的发展而发展,也容易受到确认偏差的影响。这表明,对于安全关键系统的开发,敏捷团队开发的软件系统将需要由独立的各方进行验证和确认。在讨论如何将我们早期的发现应用于安全关键软件质量管理之前,我们回顾了当前医疗器械软件开发的质量管理实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Quality Assurance in Agile Safety-Critical Systems Development
In this position paper we examine how safety could be assured when increasingly complex systems are developed using agile software development methods. We first discuss the source and nature of complexity in software systems and how a probe – sense – learn approach recommended by the Cynefin Framework is appropriate for designing complex systems and a sense – analyse – learn approach is appropriate for developing a complicated system whose design has been determined. We then examine how quality assurance is incorporated into agile software development before pointing out that those characteristics of a self-managed team that produce so many benefits for software development of complex systems whose solution evolves with problem understanding, are also vulnerable to confirmation bias. This suggests that for safety critical system development, software systems developed by agile teams will need verification and validation by independent parties. We review current quality management practices for medical device software development before discussing how our earlier findings could be adopted into safety critical software quality management.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Customizable Approach for the Automated Quality Assessment of Modelling Artifacts A Process Framework with Agile Practices for Implementation of Project Portfolio Management Process Towards a Model about Quality of Software Requirements Specification in Agile Projects Expressing Measurement Uncertainty in Software Models Adopting Logical Architectures within Agile Projects
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1