帮助移动软件代码审阅者:Bug修复和重构模式的研究

Zhiyuan Chen
{"title":"帮助移动软件代码审阅者:Bug修复和重构模式的研究","authors":"Zhiyuan Chen","doi":"10.1145/2897073.2897130","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Mobile Developers commonly spend a significant amount of time and effort on conducting code reviews on newly introduced and domain-specific practices, such as platform-specific feature addition, quality of service anti-pattern refactorings, and battery-related bug fixes. To address these problems, we conducted a large empirical study over the software change history of 318 open source projects and investigated platform-dependent code changes from open source projects. Our analysis focuses on what types of changes mobile application developers typically make and how they perceive, recall, and communicate changed and affected code. Our study required the development of an automated strategy to examine open source repositories and categorize platform-related refactoring edits, bug repairs, and API updates, mining 1,961,990 commit changes. Our findings call for the need to develop a new recommendation system aimed at efficiently identifying required changes such as bug fixes and refactorings during mobile application code reviews.","PeriodicalId":296509,"journal":{"name":"2016 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Mobile Software Engineering and Systems (MOBILESoft)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Helping Mobile Software Code Reviewers: A Study of Bug Repair and Refactoring Patterns\",\"authors\":\"Zhiyuan Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/2897073.2897130\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Mobile Developers commonly spend a significant amount of time and effort on conducting code reviews on newly introduced and domain-specific practices, such as platform-specific feature addition, quality of service anti-pattern refactorings, and battery-related bug fixes. To address these problems, we conducted a large empirical study over the software change history of 318 open source projects and investigated platform-dependent code changes from open source projects. Our analysis focuses on what types of changes mobile application developers typically make and how they perceive, recall, and communicate changed and affected code. Our study required the development of an automated strategy to examine open source repositories and categorize platform-related refactoring edits, bug repairs, and API updates, mining 1,961,990 commit changes. Our findings call for the need to develop a new recommendation system aimed at efficiently identifying required changes such as bug fixes and refactorings during mobile application code reviews.\",\"PeriodicalId\":296509,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2016 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Mobile Software Engineering and Systems (MOBILESoft)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-05-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2016 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Mobile Software Engineering and Systems (MOBILESoft)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/2897073.2897130\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Mobile Software Engineering and Systems (MOBILESoft)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2897073.2897130","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

移动开发人员通常会花费大量的时间和精力对新引入的和特定领域的实践进行代码审查,例如特定于平平台的特性添加、服务质量反模式重构和电池相关的错误修复。为了解决这些问题,我们对318个开源项目的软件变更历史进行了大规模的实证研究,并调查了开源项目中与平台相关的代码变更。我们的分析侧重于移动应用程序开发人员通常会做出哪些类型的更改,以及他们如何感知、回忆和沟通更改和受影响的代码。我们的研究需要开发一种自动化策略来检查开源存储库,并对与平台相关的重构编辑、错误修复和API更新进行分类,挖掘1,961,990个提交更改。我们的研究结果表明,需要开发一种新的推荐系统,旨在有效地识别移动应用程序代码审查期间所需的更改,如bug修复和重构。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Helping Mobile Software Code Reviewers: A Study of Bug Repair and Refactoring Patterns
Mobile Developers commonly spend a significant amount of time and effort on conducting code reviews on newly introduced and domain-specific practices, such as platform-specific feature addition, quality of service anti-pattern refactorings, and battery-related bug fixes. To address these problems, we conducted a large empirical study over the software change history of 318 open source projects and investigated platform-dependent code changes from open source projects. Our analysis focuses on what types of changes mobile application developers typically make and how they perceive, recall, and communicate changed and affected code. Our study required the development of an automated strategy to examine open source repositories and categorize platform-related refactoring edits, bug repairs, and API updates, mining 1,961,990 commit changes. Our findings call for the need to develop a new recommendation system aimed at efficiently identifying required changes such as bug fixes and refactorings during mobile application code reviews.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Preserving Energy Resources Using an Android Kernel Extension: A Case Study Comparing Performance Parameters of Mobile App Development Strategies VALERA: An Effective and Efficient Record-and-Replay Tool for Android Mobile Exergaming: Exergames on the Go Model Under Design and Over Design on Mobile Applications
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1