{"title":"ITER-EDA设计约束能力","authors":"N. Uckan","doi":"10.1109/FUSION.1993.518311","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Confinement capability of the ITER-EDA (R=7.75 m, I=25 MA) operational scenarios is evaluated and compared with the ITER CDA (R=6 m, 22 MA). The ignition capability of ITER EDA is somewhat higher than that of CDA by a factor of 1.1-1.2 with empirical power law scalings and by a factor of 1.5-2 with offset linear scalings. Simulations with the RLW /spl chi/(/spl nabla/T/sub e/)/sub crit/ model show that both the EDA and CDA scenarios operates in L-mode, however CDA ignition margin is much smaller. With empirical scalings, the required L-mode confinement enhancement factor [H=/spl tau//sub E///spl tau//sub E/(scaling)] corresponding to, for example, ITER89-P L-mode scaling would be 1.5-1.6 in ITER EDA relative to 1.8 in CDA for 10% He (plus 1% Be) concentration. At a higher concentration of He of 20-25%, the confinement capability is deteriorated and the required confinement enhancement factor (over empirical L-mode scalings) is /spl ges/2. The Ohmic confinement time is a factor of two higher in the EDA design (as compared to the CDA), yielding a strong reduction in the auxiliary power required to reach ignition. In 1.5-D simulations with L-mode enhancement factors of H/spl ges/1.2 allowed ohmic ignition with 25 MA, ignition was aided by initially peaked density profiles (and low He content) during the start-up.","PeriodicalId":365814,"journal":{"name":"15th IEEE/NPSS Symposium. Fusion Engineering","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1993-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Confinement capability of ITER-EDA design\",\"authors\":\"N. Uckan\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/FUSION.1993.518311\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Confinement capability of the ITER-EDA (R=7.75 m, I=25 MA) operational scenarios is evaluated and compared with the ITER CDA (R=6 m, 22 MA). The ignition capability of ITER EDA is somewhat higher than that of CDA by a factor of 1.1-1.2 with empirical power law scalings and by a factor of 1.5-2 with offset linear scalings. Simulations with the RLW /spl chi/(/spl nabla/T/sub e/)/sub crit/ model show that both the EDA and CDA scenarios operates in L-mode, however CDA ignition margin is much smaller. With empirical scalings, the required L-mode confinement enhancement factor [H=/spl tau//sub E///spl tau//sub E/(scaling)] corresponding to, for example, ITER89-P L-mode scaling would be 1.5-1.6 in ITER EDA relative to 1.8 in CDA for 10% He (plus 1% Be) concentration. At a higher concentration of He of 20-25%, the confinement capability is deteriorated and the required confinement enhancement factor (over empirical L-mode scalings) is /spl ges/2. The Ohmic confinement time is a factor of two higher in the EDA design (as compared to the CDA), yielding a strong reduction in the auxiliary power required to reach ignition. In 1.5-D simulations with L-mode enhancement factors of H/spl ges/1.2 allowed ohmic ignition with 25 MA, ignition was aided by initially peaked density profiles (and low He content) during the start-up.\",\"PeriodicalId\":365814,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"15th IEEE/NPSS Symposium. Fusion Engineering\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1993-10-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"15th IEEE/NPSS Symposium. Fusion Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/FUSION.1993.518311\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"15th IEEE/NPSS Symposium. Fusion Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/FUSION.1993.518311","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Confinement capability of the ITER-EDA (R=7.75 m, I=25 MA) operational scenarios is evaluated and compared with the ITER CDA (R=6 m, 22 MA). The ignition capability of ITER EDA is somewhat higher than that of CDA by a factor of 1.1-1.2 with empirical power law scalings and by a factor of 1.5-2 with offset linear scalings. Simulations with the RLW /spl chi/(/spl nabla/T/sub e/)/sub crit/ model show that both the EDA and CDA scenarios operates in L-mode, however CDA ignition margin is much smaller. With empirical scalings, the required L-mode confinement enhancement factor [H=/spl tau//sub E///spl tau//sub E/(scaling)] corresponding to, for example, ITER89-P L-mode scaling would be 1.5-1.6 in ITER EDA relative to 1.8 in CDA for 10% He (plus 1% Be) concentration. At a higher concentration of He of 20-25%, the confinement capability is deteriorated and the required confinement enhancement factor (over empirical L-mode scalings) is /spl ges/2. The Ohmic confinement time is a factor of two higher in the EDA design (as compared to the CDA), yielding a strong reduction in the auxiliary power required to reach ignition. In 1.5-D simulations with L-mode enhancement factors of H/spl ges/1.2 allowed ohmic ignition with 25 MA, ignition was aided by initially peaked density profiles (and low He content) during the start-up.