巴奥拉集团政治沟通失败

Koesworo Setiawan
{"title":"巴奥拉集团政治沟通失败","authors":"Koesworo Setiawan","doi":"10.33751/wahana.v25i1.1219","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRAK Untuk penegakan hukum, keamanan dan keselamatan pelayaran, sebanyak 12 instansi diberi kewenangan di laut berdasarkan 23 regulasi. Namun meskipun mereka disatukan dalam wadah Badan Koordinasi Keamanan Laut, tidak otomatis menyelesaikan masalah. Sikap ego sektoral, hubungan konfliktual, dan berbagai benturan kepentingan tetap terjadi saat mereka bertugas di lapangan. Melalui pendekatan studi kasus, penelitian ini ingin mengungkap mengapa koordinasi sulit dilakukan meskipun mereka sudah berada dalam wadah yang sama. Berbagai saluran komunikasi pertemuan seperti “rapat pleno, rapat tim korkamla” dan sebagainya dalam organisasi dimana mereka bergabung, tidak berhasil membentuk kesadaran dan kesepahaman tentang pentingnya membangun sinergitas. Faktor politik dan regulasi penyebab macetnya komunikasi 12 instansi keamanan laut tersebut. ABSTRACT For law enforcement, shipping security and safety, 12 agencies were given authority at the sea based on 23 regulations. But even though they joint together on the same body named Sea Security Coordination Board, it does not automatically solve the problem. Sectoral ego attitudes, conflictual relationships, and various conflicts of interest still occur when they carry out the task. Through a case study approach, this study wants to reveal why coordination is so difficult among them even though they are already to be member of the same body. Various channels of communication held in the organizations, such as “rapat pleno, rapat tim korkamla, etc”, have not succeeded in building the same perception and mutual understanding about the urgency of synergy. Some political factors and regulations that caused communication jams of the 12 sea security agencies.  Keyword: bakorkamla, keamanan laut, pelayaran,","PeriodicalId":416039,"journal":{"name":"Media Bahasa, Sastra, dan Budaya Wahana","volume":"50 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"KEGAGALAN KOMUNIKASI POLITIK “STAKE HOLDER” BAKORKAMLA\",\"authors\":\"Koesworo Setiawan\",\"doi\":\"10.33751/wahana.v25i1.1219\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRAK Untuk penegakan hukum, keamanan dan keselamatan pelayaran, sebanyak 12 instansi diberi kewenangan di laut berdasarkan 23 regulasi. Namun meskipun mereka disatukan dalam wadah Badan Koordinasi Keamanan Laut, tidak otomatis menyelesaikan masalah. Sikap ego sektoral, hubungan konfliktual, dan berbagai benturan kepentingan tetap terjadi saat mereka bertugas di lapangan. Melalui pendekatan studi kasus, penelitian ini ingin mengungkap mengapa koordinasi sulit dilakukan meskipun mereka sudah berada dalam wadah yang sama. Berbagai saluran komunikasi pertemuan seperti “rapat pleno, rapat tim korkamla” dan sebagainya dalam organisasi dimana mereka bergabung, tidak berhasil membentuk kesadaran dan kesepahaman tentang pentingnya membangun sinergitas. Faktor politik dan regulasi penyebab macetnya komunikasi 12 instansi keamanan laut tersebut. ABSTRACT For law enforcement, shipping security and safety, 12 agencies were given authority at the sea based on 23 regulations. But even though they joint together on the same body named Sea Security Coordination Board, it does not automatically solve the problem. Sectoral ego attitudes, conflictual relationships, and various conflicts of interest still occur when they carry out the task. Through a case study approach, this study wants to reveal why coordination is so difficult among them even though they are already to be member of the same body. Various channels of communication held in the organizations, such as “rapat pleno, rapat tim korkamla, etc”, have not succeeded in building the same perception and mutual understanding about the urgency of synergy. Some political factors and regulations that caused communication jams of the 12 sea security agencies.  Keyword: bakorkamla, keamanan laut, pelayaran,\",\"PeriodicalId\":416039,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Media Bahasa, Sastra, dan Budaya Wahana\",\"volume\":\"50 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Media Bahasa, Sastra, dan Budaya Wahana\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33751/wahana.v25i1.1219\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Media Bahasa, Sastra, dan Budaya Wahana","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33751/wahana.v25i1.1219","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

根据23项监管,由12个机构组成的航运执行、安全和安全部门。但即使它们被放在海洋安全协调机构的集装箱里,也不能自动解决问题。部门意识、冲突关系和利益冲突在他们的工作中仍然存在。通过案例研究的方法,这项研究想要找出为什么即使在相同的容器中,也很难进行协调。各种会议沟通渠道,如“全体会议、korkamla团队会议”等,未能在其所属组织中形成一种意识和共识,即建立聚合会的重要性。造成12个海洋安全部门沟通崩溃的政治和监管因素。根据《执法条例》、《航运安全与安全》、12家机构在《海洋条例》上获得授权。但即使他们在同一具尸体上团结在一起,这也不是自动解决问题的。Sectoral ego的态度,冲突关系,和各种各样的利益冲突当他们提出任务时仍然会发生。通过案例研究,这个研究想要揭示为什么协调如此困难,即使它们已经是同一具尸体。组织中有许多交流的渠道,这样的“全体会议,korkamla团队会议,等等”并没有成功地建立起同样普遍和相互理解的体系。12海安全机构的一些政治因素和规定。安全,海洋,航行,
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
KEGAGALAN KOMUNIKASI POLITIK “STAKE HOLDER” BAKORKAMLA
ABSTRAK Untuk penegakan hukum, keamanan dan keselamatan pelayaran, sebanyak 12 instansi diberi kewenangan di laut berdasarkan 23 regulasi. Namun meskipun mereka disatukan dalam wadah Badan Koordinasi Keamanan Laut, tidak otomatis menyelesaikan masalah. Sikap ego sektoral, hubungan konfliktual, dan berbagai benturan kepentingan tetap terjadi saat mereka bertugas di lapangan. Melalui pendekatan studi kasus, penelitian ini ingin mengungkap mengapa koordinasi sulit dilakukan meskipun mereka sudah berada dalam wadah yang sama. Berbagai saluran komunikasi pertemuan seperti “rapat pleno, rapat tim korkamla” dan sebagainya dalam organisasi dimana mereka bergabung, tidak berhasil membentuk kesadaran dan kesepahaman tentang pentingnya membangun sinergitas. Faktor politik dan regulasi penyebab macetnya komunikasi 12 instansi keamanan laut tersebut. ABSTRACT For law enforcement, shipping security and safety, 12 agencies were given authority at the sea based on 23 regulations. But even though they joint together on the same body named Sea Security Coordination Board, it does not automatically solve the problem. Sectoral ego attitudes, conflictual relationships, and various conflicts of interest still occur when they carry out the task. Through a case study approach, this study wants to reveal why coordination is so difficult among them even though they are already to be member of the same body. Various channels of communication held in the organizations, such as “rapat pleno, rapat tim korkamla, etc”, have not succeeded in building the same perception and mutual understanding about the urgency of synergy. Some political factors and regulations that caused communication jams of the 12 sea security agencies.  Keyword: bakorkamla, keamanan laut, pelayaran,
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
AMBIGUITAS SEBAGAI PERSOALAN BAHASA DAN TANDA BACA MITOS DALAM LOGO KABUPATEN BOGOR SPORT AND TOURISM HUBUNGAN SPANDUK EDUKASI COVID-19 DENGAN KESADARAN WARGA TENTANG COVID-19 (KASUS : WILAYAH KEDUNG WARINGIN KOTA BOGOR) KOMUNIKASI INTERPERSONAL ORANG TUA DAN ANAK PADA PEMBELAJARAN DARING DI MASA PANDEMI (Kasus SDN Cipayung 01 Kecamatan Cibinong Bogor) DIGITAL SIGNAGE : MAKNA, STRATEGI PEMBUATAN PESAN, DAN IMPLEMENTASI OLEH DENTSU AGENCY
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1