{"title":"由口内、口外和CBCT扫描设备生成的数字模型的三维分析","authors":"Stuart J. Ryan, K. Stewart, A. Ghoneima","doi":"10.31038/jdmr.2019241","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective : To compare the intra- and inter-arch accuracy of three-dimensional (3D) digital models acquired from various orthodontic scanners, including: an intraoral scanner, an extraoral scanner, and a cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scan compared with the original, trimmed stone models. Methods : Fifteen sets of maxillary and mandibular finished plaster models were scanned using: Carestream 3600 intraoral scanner, Ortho-Insight 3D Motion View extraoral scanner, and Carestream 9300 CBCT scanner. Dolphin Imaging software was used to calculate various anatomic measurements on the digital models. Digital calipers were used to calculate the same measurements on the original plaster models for comparative purposes. Intraclass Correlation Coefficients (ICC) and pair-wise analysis of variance (ANOVA) were utilized to compare the 4 methods (original plaster models and 3 scanning methods). Results : ICC values for all intra-arch measurements between the 4 data groups were all >0.90. ICC values for the two inter-arch measurements (overbite and overjet) were both 0.79. CBCT measurements were significantly smaller than the two scanned models as well as the stone models for many intra-arch parameters. On average, these differences were less than 0.5mm. Conclusion : Digital models produced from CBCT scans of plaster casts appear to have adequate accuracy for orthodontic treatment planning and recordkeeping. Further studies are needed to determine the clinical efficiency of appliance design, fabrication, and chairside delivery using CBCT scanning technologies.","PeriodicalId":326702,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Dental and Maxillofacial Research","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Three-Dimensional Analysis of Digital Models Generated from Intraoral, Extraoral, and CBCT Scanning Devices\",\"authors\":\"Stuart J. Ryan, K. Stewart, A. Ghoneima\",\"doi\":\"10.31038/jdmr.2019241\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective : To compare the intra- and inter-arch accuracy of three-dimensional (3D) digital models acquired from various orthodontic scanners, including: an intraoral scanner, an extraoral scanner, and a cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scan compared with the original, trimmed stone models. Methods : Fifteen sets of maxillary and mandibular finished plaster models were scanned using: Carestream 3600 intraoral scanner, Ortho-Insight 3D Motion View extraoral scanner, and Carestream 9300 CBCT scanner. Dolphin Imaging software was used to calculate various anatomic measurements on the digital models. Digital calipers were used to calculate the same measurements on the original plaster models for comparative purposes. Intraclass Correlation Coefficients (ICC) and pair-wise analysis of variance (ANOVA) were utilized to compare the 4 methods (original plaster models and 3 scanning methods). Results : ICC values for all intra-arch measurements between the 4 data groups were all >0.90. ICC values for the two inter-arch measurements (overbite and overjet) were both 0.79. CBCT measurements were significantly smaller than the two scanned models as well as the stone models for many intra-arch parameters. On average, these differences were less than 0.5mm. Conclusion : Digital models produced from CBCT scans of plaster casts appear to have adequate accuracy for orthodontic treatment planning and recordkeeping. Further studies are needed to determine the clinical efficiency of appliance design, fabrication, and chairside delivery using CBCT scanning technologies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":326702,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Dental and Maxillofacial Research\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Dental and Maxillofacial Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31038/jdmr.2019241\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Dental and Maxillofacial Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31038/jdmr.2019241","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
摘要
目的:比较各种正畸扫描仪(包括口内扫描仪、口外扫描仪和锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)扫描)获得的三维(3D)数字模型与原始的、修整过的结石模型的弓内和弓间精度。方法:使用Carestream 3600口腔内扫描仪、Ortho-Insight 3D Motion View口腔外扫描仪和Carestream 9300 CBCT扫描仪扫描15套上颌和下颌石膏成品模型。使用Dolphin Imaging软件对数字模型进行各种解剖测量计算。数字卡尺用于计算原始石膏模型的相同测量以进行比较。采用类内相关系数(ICC)和双方差分析(ANOVA)对4种方法(原始石膏模型和3种扫描方法)进行比较。结果:4个数据组间所有足弓内测量的ICC值均为>0.90。两种牙弓间测量(覆盖咬合和覆盖喷流)的ICC值均为0.79。CBCT测量值明显小于两种扫描模型以及许多拱内参数的石头模型。这些差异平均小于0.5mm。结论:由石膏模型CBCT扫描产生的数字模型对于正畸治疗计划和记录保存具有足够的准确性。需要进一步的研究来确定使用CBCT扫描技术的矫治器设计、制造和椅子旁递送的临床效率。
Three-Dimensional Analysis of Digital Models Generated from Intraoral, Extraoral, and CBCT Scanning Devices
Objective : To compare the intra- and inter-arch accuracy of three-dimensional (3D) digital models acquired from various orthodontic scanners, including: an intraoral scanner, an extraoral scanner, and a cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scan compared with the original, trimmed stone models. Methods : Fifteen sets of maxillary and mandibular finished plaster models were scanned using: Carestream 3600 intraoral scanner, Ortho-Insight 3D Motion View extraoral scanner, and Carestream 9300 CBCT scanner. Dolphin Imaging software was used to calculate various anatomic measurements on the digital models. Digital calipers were used to calculate the same measurements on the original plaster models for comparative purposes. Intraclass Correlation Coefficients (ICC) and pair-wise analysis of variance (ANOVA) were utilized to compare the 4 methods (original plaster models and 3 scanning methods). Results : ICC values for all intra-arch measurements between the 4 data groups were all >0.90. ICC values for the two inter-arch measurements (overbite and overjet) were both 0.79. CBCT measurements were significantly smaller than the two scanned models as well as the stone models for many intra-arch parameters. On average, these differences were less than 0.5mm. Conclusion : Digital models produced from CBCT scans of plaster casts appear to have adequate accuracy for orthodontic treatment planning and recordkeeping. Further studies are needed to determine the clinical efficiency of appliance design, fabrication, and chairside delivery using CBCT scanning technologies.