用Brinson归因解释时间加权(TWR)和货币加权(IRR)收益的差异

Cfa Digest Pub Date : 2017-04-01 DOI:10.2469/dig.v47.n4.4
M. Szudejko
{"title":"用Brinson归因解释时间加权(TWR)和货币加权(IRR)收益的差异","authors":"M. Szudejko","doi":"10.2469/dig.v47.n4.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Stock managers and investors have historically used the time-weighted return (TWR) as the sole performance reporting measure because industry standards have endorsed the use, not to mention the fact that equity indices and benchmarks are reported on the same basis. The TWR lends itself nicely to daily priced, daily traded and liquid investments. It’s not surprising that bonds are reported in the same manner. As alternative asset classes and newfangled investment structures evolved, including closed-end vehicles in private equity and venture capital, it became clear that the TWR didn’t quite fit, although it is still desired by chief investment officers because one return measure is needed to aggregate performance and to compare performance across multiple asset classes.","PeriodicalId":359745,"journal":{"name":"Cfa Digest","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using Brinson Attribution to Explain the Differences between Time-Weighted (TWR) and Money-Weighted (IRR) Returns\",\"authors\":\"M. Szudejko\",\"doi\":\"10.2469/dig.v47.n4.4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Stock managers and investors have historically used the time-weighted return (TWR) as the sole performance reporting measure because industry standards have endorsed the use, not to mention the fact that equity indices and benchmarks are reported on the same basis. The TWR lends itself nicely to daily priced, daily traded and liquid investments. It’s not surprising that bonds are reported in the same manner. As alternative asset classes and newfangled investment structures evolved, including closed-end vehicles in private equity and venture capital, it became clear that the TWR didn’t quite fit, although it is still desired by chief investment officers because one return measure is needed to aggregate performance and to compare performance across multiple asset classes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":359745,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cfa Digest\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cfa Digest\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2469/dig.v47.n4.4\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cfa Digest","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2469/dig.v47.n4.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

股票经理和投资者历来使用时间加权回报率(TWR)作为唯一的业绩报告衡量标准,因为行业标准已经认可了这种使用,更不用说股票指数和基准是在相同的基础上报告的事实。TWR适合于每日定价、每日交易和流动性投资。债券以同样的方式报告并不奇怪。随着另类资产类别和新型投资结构(包括私募股权和风险资本的封闭式投资工具)的发展,TWR显然不太适合,尽管首席投资官仍然希望TWR,因为需要一个回报指标来汇总业绩,并比较多个资产类别的业绩。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Using Brinson Attribution to Explain the Differences between Time-Weighted (TWR) and Money-Weighted (IRR) Returns
Stock managers and investors have historically used the time-weighted return (TWR) as the sole performance reporting measure because industry standards have endorsed the use, not to mention the fact that equity indices and benchmarks are reported on the same basis. The TWR lends itself nicely to daily priced, daily traded and liquid investments. It’s not surprising that bonds are reported in the same manner. As alternative asset classes and newfangled investment structures evolved, including closed-end vehicles in private equity and venture capital, it became clear that the TWR didn’t quite fit, although it is still desired by chief investment officers because one return measure is needed to aggregate performance and to compare performance across multiple asset classes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Characteristics That Provide Independent Information about Average U.S. Monthly Stock Returns How (Over) Confident Are Financial Analysts? Credit Default Swaps and Firms’ Financing Policies Payout Yields and Stock Return Predictability: How Important Is the Measure of Cash Flow? An Upper Bound for an Ex Post Sharpe Ratio with Application in Performance Measurement
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1