网络平台协作学习中不同类型互动的探索

Ruixue Liu, Changdi Shi
{"title":"网络平台协作学习中不同类型互动的探索","authors":"Ruixue Liu, Changdi Shi","doi":"10.1109/ISET.2016.31","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There is a need for collaborative learning that promotes students' diverse interactions in online platforms. The purpose of this study is to investigate four types of interaction (social, learning, egocentric and allocentric interaction) in collaborative learning environment that based on Moodle and WeChat. The sample of this study includes 78 students (age 20-24) in China who have experience using Moodle and WeChat. The results indicate that Moodle is more suitable for learning interaction while WeChat is more suitable for social interaction. The overall interaction knowledge construction level is relatively low in two platforms. It is concluded that choosing appropriate learning platform supporting students' diverse interactions are important in online learning.","PeriodicalId":192854,"journal":{"name":"2016 International Symposium on Educational Technology (ISET)","volume":"114 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring Different Types of Interaction on Collaborative Learning in Online Platforms\",\"authors\":\"Ruixue Liu, Changdi Shi\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ISET.2016.31\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"There is a need for collaborative learning that promotes students' diverse interactions in online platforms. The purpose of this study is to investigate four types of interaction (social, learning, egocentric and allocentric interaction) in collaborative learning environment that based on Moodle and WeChat. The sample of this study includes 78 students (age 20-24) in China who have experience using Moodle and WeChat. The results indicate that Moodle is more suitable for learning interaction while WeChat is more suitable for social interaction. The overall interaction knowledge construction level is relatively low in two platforms. It is concluded that choosing appropriate learning platform supporting students' diverse interactions are important in online learning.\",\"PeriodicalId\":192854,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2016 International Symposium on Educational Technology (ISET)\",\"volume\":\"114 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-07-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2016 International Symposium on Educational Technology (ISET)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISET.2016.31\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 International Symposium on Educational Technology (ISET)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISET.2016.31","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

需要协作学习,促进学生在网络平台上的多样化互动。本研究的目的是探讨基于Moodle和微信的协作学习环境中的四种交互类型(社交、学习、自我中心和非中心交互)。本研究的样本包括78名有使用Moodle和微信经验的中国学生(年龄在20-24岁)。结果表明,Moodle更适合学习互动,微信更适合社交互动。两个平台的整体交互知识构建水平相对较低。研究表明,选择合适的学习平台支持学生的多样化互动对在线学习至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Exploring Different Types of Interaction on Collaborative Learning in Online Platforms
There is a need for collaborative learning that promotes students' diverse interactions in online platforms. The purpose of this study is to investigate four types of interaction (social, learning, egocentric and allocentric interaction) in collaborative learning environment that based on Moodle and WeChat. The sample of this study includes 78 students (age 20-24) in China who have experience using Moodle and WeChat. The results indicate that Moodle is more suitable for learning interaction while WeChat is more suitable for social interaction. The overall interaction knowledge construction level is relatively low in two platforms. It is concluded that choosing appropriate learning platform supporting students' diverse interactions are important in online learning.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Attentiveness and Self-Studying are Keys to Academic Performance Exploring Different Types of Interaction on Collaborative Learning in Online Platforms Online Judge System and Its Applications in C Language Teaching A Social Network Analysis of Online Collaborative Learning Aspects in an Online Course Online eLearning System for Live Band Practicing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1