问责制和武装部队的使用

Roshan Panesar
{"title":"问责制和武装部队的使用","authors":"Roshan Panesar","doi":"10.1080/10854681.2022.2117945","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"1. For over a century, the deployment of the armed forces abroad has been carried out by the government with minimal or no involvement from Parliament. Yet, the House of Commons’ increasing involvement in such decisions is one of several constitutional changes since 1997. Starting in 2003, the Commons has been given a vote on military deployments in Iraq, Libya and Syria. A constitutional convention developed by which the government seeks the Commons’ approval for military action.","PeriodicalId":232228,"journal":{"name":"Judicial Review","volume":"105 6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Accountability and the Use of the Armed Forces\",\"authors\":\"Roshan Panesar\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10854681.2022.2117945\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"1. For over a century, the deployment of the armed forces abroad has been carried out by the government with minimal or no involvement from Parliament. Yet, the House of Commons’ increasing involvement in such decisions is one of several constitutional changes since 1997. Starting in 2003, the Commons has been given a vote on military deployments in Iraq, Libya and Syria. A constitutional convention developed by which the government seeks the Commons’ approval for military action.\",\"PeriodicalId\":232228,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Judicial Review\",\"volume\":\"105 6 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Judicial Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10854681.2022.2117945\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Judicial Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10854681.2022.2117945","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

1. 一个多世纪以来,海外武装部队的部署一直由政府负责,很少或根本没有议会的参与。然而,自1997年以来,下议院越来越多地参与此类决定是几项宪法改革之一。从2003年开始,下议院就伊拉克、利比亚和叙利亚的军事部署进行了投票。一种制宪会议,政府通过它寻求下议院对军事行动的批准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Accountability and the Use of the Armed Forces
1. For over a century, the deployment of the armed forces abroad has been carried out by the government with minimal or no involvement from Parliament. Yet, the House of Commons’ increasing involvement in such decisions is one of several constitutional changes since 1997. Starting in 2003, the Commons has been given a vote on military deployments in Iraq, Libya and Syria. A constitutional convention developed by which the government seeks the Commons’ approval for military action.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Article 2 and Standards of Proof in Inquests: Unintelligible, Unclear, and Unpredictable? Of Codes and Common Law: The Approach to Apparent Bias in Local Government Committees Competing ‘Clear and Unambiguous’ Constructions: Darwall v Dartmoor National Park Authority [2023] EWCA Civ 927 and the Interpretation of Private Acts of Parliament The Curious Case of Boris’ Bishop: Did the First Catholic Prime Minister Fall Foul of s 18 of the Roman Catholic Relief Act 1829? Information Law and Automated Governance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1