Anny Susilowati Susilowati
{"title":"BERITA BOHONG (HOAKS) PADA MEDIA SOSIAL DALAM PERSPEKTIF PERUNDANG-UNDANGAN DI INDONESIA","authors":"Anny Susilowati Susilowati","doi":"10.35334/AY.V4I1.1022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This research is motivated by the rise of hoaxes every time before the  Presidential Election (Pilpres) in Indonesia. Later hoaxes are increasingly massive  and have entered all lines of life, so it is very difficult to determine which news is  good and where lies. For this reason, it is necessary to clarify the formulation of  juridical regulations, regarding hoax aspects that can be held accountable.This research then sets two goals, namely: First, to analyze and explain a number of laws and regulations relating to hoaxes; Second, to analyze and explain  the hoax criteria contained in social media.This research method uses a type of normative legal research, with three approaches as the basis of its analysis, namely: Approach to legislation, namely to  conduct an analysis of legislation about hoaxes, with a review of relevant product  laws. Conceptual approach, through this approach, researchers study views and  doctrines in law, then find ideas that give birth to legal notions, legal concepts and  legal principles relevant to hoaxes. As well as the case approach, namely by  examining cases relating to the issues faced which have become court decisions and have permanent legal force.The results showed that hoax qualifications that could be liable by  referring to Law Number 1 Year 1946 concerning Criminal Law Regulations,  Article 14 and 15 and Law Number 19 Year 2016 concerning amendments to Law  Number 11 Year 2008 concerning Electronic Information and Transactions (ITE)  article 28 paragraph (1). In Law No. 1 of 1946 the perpetrators can be charged if they have fulfilled the element intentionally or have the intention to cause trouble  and the person must at least have the presumption that the news is false news.  Whereas in Act No. 19 of 2016 the culprit can be snared if everyone intentionally  means that they have bad intentions and without the right to spread false and  misleading news, which means making other people astray which results in consumer losses in electronic transactions. Deliberately, making a misguided and making consumer losses is a requirement that must be fulfilled. So that in article 45 A paragraph 1, the culprit can be sentenced to six years imprisonment and a fine of Rp1 billion.Researcher's recommendation, It is recommended that the action  qualifications spread hoaxes on social media that accountability can be requested  in a more specific law, namely social media law. This is to anticipate the  development of social media going forward. Keywords: News, Hoax News, Social Media, and ITE Law ","PeriodicalId":322454,"journal":{"name":"JURNAL AKTA YUDISIA","volume":"97 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JURNAL AKTA YUDISIA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35334/AY.V4I1.1022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的动机是每次印度尼西亚总统选举(Pilpres)之前恶作剧的兴起。后来的恶作剧越来越多,已经进入生活的各个方面,所以很难确定哪些是好消息,哪些是谎言。出于这个原因,有必要明确制定司法法规,关于恶作剧方面可以追究责任。本研究设定了两个目标,即:第一,分析和解释一些与骗局有关的法律法规;第二,分析和解释社交媒体中包含的恶作剧标准。本研究方法采用一种规范的法律研究方法,以三种方法作为其分析的基础,即:立法方法,即对有关骗局的立法进行分析,并对相关产品法律进行回顾。概念法,通过这种方法,研究者研究法律上的观点和学说,然后找到产生与骗局相关的法律概念、法律概念和法律原则的思想。以及个案方法,即通过审查与所面临的问题有关的案件,这些问题已成为法院判决并具有永久法律效力。结果表明,骗局资格可能被指法律责任有关刑法规定,1946年1号19号14和15条和法律,2016年有关法律修正案11号2008年有关电子信息和事务(ITE)第二十八条(1)款。1946年法律1号可以起诉肇事者是否有满足元素有意或有意图制造麻烦,人必须至少有假定这条新闻是假新闻。而在2016年第19号法案中,如果每个人都故意表示他们有不良意图,并且没有权利传播虚假和误导性的新闻,这意味着使其他人误入歧途,导致消费者在电子交易中遭受损失,那么罪犯可以被诱捕。故意制造误导,造成消费者损失,是必须满足的要求。因此,在第45 A条第1款中,罪犯可被判处六年监禁和10亿卢比的罚款。研究人员的建议,建议行动资格在社交媒体上传播骗局,可以在更具体的法律中要求问责,即社交媒体法。这是为了预测未来社交媒体的发展。关键词:新闻,恶作剧新闻,社交媒体,信息产权法
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
BERITA BOHONG (HOAKS) PADA MEDIA SOSIAL DALAM PERSPEKTIF PERUNDANG-UNDANGAN DI INDONESIA
Abstract This research is motivated by the rise of hoaxes every time before the  Presidential Election (Pilpres) in Indonesia. Later hoaxes are increasingly massive  and have entered all lines of life, so it is very difficult to determine which news is  good and where lies. For this reason, it is necessary to clarify the formulation of  juridical regulations, regarding hoax aspects that can be held accountable.This research then sets two goals, namely: First, to analyze and explain a number of laws and regulations relating to hoaxes; Second, to analyze and explain  the hoax criteria contained in social media.This research method uses a type of normative legal research, with three approaches as the basis of its analysis, namely: Approach to legislation, namely to  conduct an analysis of legislation about hoaxes, with a review of relevant product  laws. Conceptual approach, through this approach, researchers study views and  doctrines in law, then find ideas that give birth to legal notions, legal concepts and  legal principles relevant to hoaxes. As well as the case approach, namely by  examining cases relating to the issues faced which have become court decisions and have permanent legal force.The results showed that hoax qualifications that could be liable by  referring to Law Number 1 Year 1946 concerning Criminal Law Regulations,  Article 14 and 15 and Law Number 19 Year 2016 concerning amendments to Law  Number 11 Year 2008 concerning Electronic Information and Transactions (ITE)  article 28 paragraph (1). In Law No. 1 of 1946 the perpetrators can be charged if they have fulfilled the element intentionally or have the intention to cause trouble  and the person must at least have the presumption that the news is false news.  Whereas in Act No. 19 of 2016 the culprit can be snared if everyone intentionally  means that they have bad intentions and without the right to spread false and  misleading news, which means making other people astray which results in consumer losses in electronic transactions. Deliberately, making a misguided and making consumer losses is a requirement that must be fulfilled. So that in article 45 A paragraph 1, the culprit can be sentenced to six years imprisonment and a fine of Rp1 billion.Researcher's recommendation, It is recommended that the action  qualifications spread hoaxes on social media that accountability can be requested  in a more specific law, namely social media law. This is to anticipate the  development of social media going forward. Keywords: News, Hoax News, Social Media, and ITE Law 
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
EKSISTENSI PERJANJIAN ELEKTRONIK SEBAGAI ALAT BUKTI DALAM HUKUM ACARA PERDATA PENGAWASAN OMBUDSMAN TERHADAP PENYELENGGARAAN PELAYANAN PUBLIK PADA MASA PANDEMI CORONA VIRUS DISEASE 2019 (COVID-19) TANGGUNGJAWAB HUKUM USAHA KLINIK KESEHATAN DI KOTA TARAKAN TERHADAP SEGALA RESIKO USAHA BENTUK KETERBUKAAN RAHASIA MEDIS DALAM SITUASI PANDEMI VIRUS COVID 19 DI INDONESIA ASPEK HUKUM LABORATORIUM FORENSIK KEIMIGRASIAN: STUDI KASUS PEMERIKSAAN PASPOR PALSU KEBANGSAAN INGGRIS ATAS NAMA ABBAS TAUQEER
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1