{"title":"在类型完整的持久化RPC中传递参数的语义","authors":"M. Silva, M. Atkinson, A. Black","doi":"10.1109/ICDCS.1996.507989","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Current RPC mechanisms for persistent languages are either pass by reference-in which case they do not scale-or pass by copy-in which case they duplicate objects and destroy sharing relationships. In this paper we argue that to build very large distributed persistent applications a compromise between these two mechanisms is needed. The ultimate goal of our research is to build a scalable persistent RPC while still maintaining object sharing type safety, type completeness and semantics that are readily understood by application programmers.","PeriodicalId":159322,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of 16th International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems","volume":"100 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"18","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Semantics for parameter passing in a type-complete persistent RPC\",\"authors\":\"M. Silva, M. Atkinson, A. Black\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICDCS.1996.507989\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Current RPC mechanisms for persistent languages are either pass by reference-in which case they do not scale-or pass by copy-in which case they duplicate objects and destroy sharing relationships. In this paper we argue that to build very large distributed persistent applications a compromise between these two mechanisms is needed. The ultimate goal of our research is to build a scalable persistent RPC while still maintaining object sharing type safety, type completeness and semantics that are readily understood by application programmers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":159322,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of 16th International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems\",\"volume\":\"100 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1996-05-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"18\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of 16th International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDCS.1996.507989\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of 16th International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDCS.1996.507989","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Semantics for parameter passing in a type-complete persistent RPC
Current RPC mechanisms for persistent languages are either pass by reference-in which case they do not scale-or pass by copy-in which case they duplicate objects and destroy sharing relationships. In this paper we argue that to build very large distributed persistent applications a compromise between these two mechanisms is needed. The ultimate goal of our research is to build a scalable persistent RPC while still maintaining object sharing type safety, type completeness and semantics that are readily understood by application programmers.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
