错误传播的一个例子被重新解释为减法抵消

J. S. Dukelow
{"title":"错误传播的一个例子被重新解释为减法抵消","authors":"J. S. Dukelow","doi":"10.1145/230922.230928","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"James Delaney, in his paper in SIGNUM Newsletter [1], convincingly demonstrates that the recursion[EQUATION]blows up because of catastrophic loss of precision due to subtractive cancellation. Values of In calculated using this recursion are given in the second column of Table 1.","PeriodicalId":177516,"journal":{"name":"ACM Signum Newsletter","volume":"118 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An example of error propagation reinterpreted as subtractive cancellation—revisited\",\"authors\":\"J. S. Dukelow\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/230922.230928\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"James Delaney, in his paper in SIGNUM Newsletter [1], convincingly demonstrates that the recursion[EQUATION]blows up because of catastrophic loss of precision due to subtractive cancellation. Values of In calculated using this recursion are given in the second column of Table 1.\",\"PeriodicalId\":177516,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACM Signum Newsletter\",\"volume\":\"118 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1996-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACM Signum Newsletter\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/230922.230928\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM Signum Newsletter","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/230922.230928","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

James Delaney在他的论文《SIGNUM Newsletter b[1]》中令人信服地证明了递归[方程]的爆炸,因为减法抵消导致精度的灾难性损失。表1的第二列给出了使用这种递归计算的In值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
An example of error propagation reinterpreted as subtractive cancellation—revisited
James Delaney, in his paper in SIGNUM Newsletter [1], convincingly demonstrates that the recursion[EQUATION]blows up because of catastrophic loss of precision due to subtractive cancellation. Values of In calculated using this recursion are given in the second column of Table 1.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Konrad Zuse: reflections on the 80th birthday of the German computing pioneer A comparison of methods for accelerating convergence of Newton's method for multiple polynomial roots Restructuring the BLAS level 1 routine for computing the modified givens transformation Analytic derivation of comparisons in binary search An interactive program to approximate double integrals: an easy to use interface for Cubpack++
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1