喉部延迟培养中分离A群链球菌的初级电镀培养基的评价。

Health laboratory science Pub Date : 1978-10-01
F D Pien, R Rudoy, N Goto, H S Uemura
{"title":"喉部延迟培养中分离A群链球菌的初级电镀培养基的评价。","authors":"F D Pien,&nbsp;R Rudoy,&nbsp;N Goto,&nbsp;H S Uemura","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim blood agar (SXT-BA), neomycin blood agar (NEO-BA) and plain sheep blood agar plates (SBA) were compared for isolating group A streptococci in 1,954 throat cultures. SBA and SXT-BA had similar isolation rates (approximately 75% of all positive isolates). NEO-BA was significantly better (87% recovery). A combination of any two media gave 92-95% recovery of group A streptococci from throat specimens.</p>","PeriodicalId":12869,"journal":{"name":"Health laboratory science","volume":"15 4","pages":"189-91"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1978-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of primary plating media for the isolation of group A streptococcus from delayed throat cultures.\",\"authors\":\"F D Pien,&nbsp;R Rudoy,&nbsp;N Goto,&nbsp;H S Uemura\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim blood agar (SXT-BA), neomycin blood agar (NEO-BA) and plain sheep blood agar plates (SBA) were compared for isolating group A streptococci in 1,954 throat cultures. SBA and SXT-BA had similar isolation rates (approximately 75% of all positive isolates). NEO-BA was significantly better (87% recovery). A combination of any two media gave 92-95% recovery of group A streptococci from throat specimens.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12869,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health laboratory science\",\"volume\":\"15 4\",\"pages\":\"189-91\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1978-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health laboratory science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health laboratory science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

采用磺胺甲恶唑-甲氧苄啶血琼脂(sst - ba)、新霉素血琼脂(NEO-BA)和普通羊血琼脂(SBA)对1954例喉部培养的A组链球菌进行分离。SBA和SXT-BA的分离率相似(约占所有阳性分离株的75%)。NEO-BA明显更好(87%的回收率)。任何两种培养基的组合可使咽喉标本中A群链球菌的回收率达到92-95%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluation of primary plating media for the isolation of group A streptococcus from delayed throat cultures.

Sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim blood agar (SXT-BA), neomycin blood agar (NEO-BA) and plain sheep blood agar plates (SBA) were compared for isolating group A streptococci in 1,954 throat cultures. SBA and SXT-BA had similar isolation rates (approximately 75% of all positive isolates). NEO-BA was significantly better (87% recovery). A combination of any two media gave 92-95% recovery of group A streptococci from throat specimens.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Staphylococcal food poisoning. Tentative method for continuous monitoring of atmospheric sulfur dioxide with amperometric instruments. Use of selective ion electrodes to determine pollutant species (ambient and source level). Evaluation of mycobacteriology laboratories: the acid-fast smear. Preservation and storage of pathogenic Neisseria.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1