认证考试。过去候选人的观点。

P P Leichner
{"title":"认证考试。过去候选人的观点。","authors":"P P Leichner","doi":"10.1177/070674377802300804","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Almost half the candidates of the 1976-77 certification examination in psychiatry answered a questionnaire seeking their opinions about the examination after they had experienced it. Opinions varied markedly depending upon whether the candidates were taking the examination for the first time or whether they were repeating it. The first-time group had the highest passing rate. This group also tended to feel adequately trained towards the examination and to like its present format. Those candidates who were repeating the examination tended to feel inadequately prepared and disliked the present format. Half the candidates in this sample had negative comments about this experience. A high level of anxiety and preoccupation with the examination were most often commented upon. A number of candidates did however find it easier and more fair than they had expected. The candidates, after taking the examination, tended as a group to feel better prepared and more positive toward the examination than the fourth year residents about to take the examination. The recommendations suggested focused on changing the task and image of the Board of Examiners, improving the examination and improving examination passing skills.","PeriodicalId":9551,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Psychiatric Association journal","volume":"23 8","pages":"531-40"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1978-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/070674377802300804","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The certification examination. Viewpoints of past candidates.\",\"authors\":\"P P Leichner\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/070674377802300804\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Almost half the candidates of the 1976-77 certification examination in psychiatry answered a questionnaire seeking their opinions about the examination after they had experienced it. Opinions varied markedly depending upon whether the candidates were taking the examination for the first time or whether they were repeating it. The first-time group had the highest passing rate. This group also tended to feel adequately trained towards the examination and to like its present format. Those candidates who were repeating the examination tended to feel inadequately prepared and disliked the present format. Half the candidates in this sample had negative comments about this experience. A high level of anxiety and preoccupation with the examination were most often commented upon. A number of candidates did however find it easier and more fair than they had expected. The candidates, after taking the examination, tended as a group to feel better prepared and more positive toward the examination than the fourth year residents about to take the examination. The recommendations suggested focused on changing the task and image of the Board of Examiners, improving the examination and improving examination passing skills.\",\"PeriodicalId\":9551,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian Psychiatric Association journal\",\"volume\":\"23 8\",\"pages\":\"531-40\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1978-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/070674377802300804\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian Psychiatric Association journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/070674377802300804\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Psychiatric Association journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/070674377802300804","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The certification examination. Viewpoints of past candidates.
Almost half the candidates of the 1976-77 certification examination in psychiatry answered a questionnaire seeking their opinions about the examination after they had experienced it. Opinions varied markedly depending upon whether the candidates were taking the examination for the first time or whether they were repeating it. The first-time group had the highest passing rate. This group also tended to feel adequately trained towards the examination and to like its present format. Those candidates who were repeating the examination tended to feel inadequately prepared and disliked the present format. Half the candidates in this sample had negative comments about this experience. A high level of anxiety and preoccupation with the examination were most often commented upon. A number of candidates did however find it easier and more fair than they had expected. The candidates, after taking the examination, tended as a group to feel better prepared and more positive toward the examination than the fourth year residents about to take the examination. The recommendations suggested focused on changing the task and image of the Board of Examiners, improving the examination and improving examination passing skills.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Quality assurance strategies in U.S. and Canadian psychiatry. Position paper on "withholding treatment". The Canadian certification examination in psychiatry. I: Historical notes. Position paper on "withholding treatment". Monosymptomatic hypochondriacal psychosis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1