[喂食低脂或高脂食物的体重小鼠和体重大鼠摄取可利用食物能量的情况]。

Die Nahrung Pub Date : 1978-01-01
K Hartmann, C Voss, N Hartmann
{"title":"[喂食低脂或高脂食物的体重小鼠和体重大鼠摄取可利用食物能量的情况]。","authors":"K Hartmann,&nbsp;C Voss,&nbsp;N Hartmann","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The uptake of utilizable dietary energy (DE) as affected by diet (containing 3 or 50% (w/w)fat), body mass (BM) and age was investigated in male Wistar rats. In comparing heavy-weight animals fed the high-fat diet (HFD) with light-weight animals fed the low-fat diet (LFD) (differences in BM up to 60%), it was found that the uptakes of DE calculated on animal were significantly higher (up to 55%) in the HFD animals than in the LFD animals; but there were no significant differences when the uptakes of DE were calculated on 100 g BM. Thus, the LFD rats (the diet of which contained a high proportion of protein (70% (w/w)) exhibited no reduced uptakes of utilizable DE as compared to HFD rats. Of the heavy-weight LFD animals and the light-weight HFD animals which showed virtually no differences in BM, the HFD animals take up more utilizable DE (per animal or per 100 g BM) than the LFD animals. This difference, which amounts to 60%, is statistically significant. The comparison of the uptakes of DE/animal/100 g BM by light-weight rats with those by heavy-weight rats fed the same diet showed that the uptakes by the heavy-weight animals were in most cases significantly greater. Consequently, the greater BM of the heavy-weight animals of the respective diet groups must be attributed to more efficient utilization of feed. This is also indicated by the fact that the light-weight HFD animals excret more fat in the faeces than the heavy-weight animals. The amount of fat excreted by the HFD animals is some 10-fold greater than that excreted by the LFD animals. However, when the amount of excreted fat is expressed in % of ingested dietary fat, the fat excretion is of the same order of magnitude on both diets.</p>","PeriodicalId":11281,"journal":{"name":"Die Nahrung","volume":"22 9","pages":"797-807"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1978-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Uptake of utilizable food energy by light-weight and heavy-weight rats fed a low-fat or high-fat diet].\",\"authors\":\"K Hartmann,&nbsp;C Voss,&nbsp;N Hartmann\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The uptake of utilizable dietary energy (DE) as affected by diet (containing 3 or 50% (w/w)fat), body mass (BM) and age was investigated in male Wistar rats. In comparing heavy-weight animals fed the high-fat diet (HFD) with light-weight animals fed the low-fat diet (LFD) (differences in BM up to 60%), it was found that the uptakes of DE calculated on animal were significantly higher (up to 55%) in the HFD animals than in the LFD animals; but there were no significant differences when the uptakes of DE were calculated on 100 g BM. Thus, the LFD rats (the diet of which contained a high proportion of protein (70% (w/w)) exhibited no reduced uptakes of utilizable DE as compared to HFD rats. Of the heavy-weight LFD animals and the light-weight HFD animals which showed virtually no differences in BM, the HFD animals take up more utilizable DE (per animal or per 100 g BM) than the LFD animals. This difference, which amounts to 60%, is statistically significant. The comparison of the uptakes of DE/animal/100 g BM by light-weight rats with those by heavy-weight rats fed the same diet showed that the uptakes by the heavy-weight animals were in most cases significantly greater. Consequently, the greater BM of the heavy-weight animals of the respective diet groups must be attributed to more efficient utilization of feed. This is also indicated by the fact that the light-weight HFD animals excret more fat in the faeces than the heavy-weight animals. The amount of fat excreted by the HFD animals is some 10-fold greater than that excreted by the LFD animals. However, when the amount of excreted fat is expressed in % of ingested dietary fat, the fat excretion is of the same order of magnitude on both diets.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11281,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Die Nahrung\",\"volume\":\"22 9\",\"pages\":\"797-807\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1978-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Die Nahrung\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Die Nahrung","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究了雄性Wistar大鼠日粮(脂肪含量为3%或50% (w/w))、体重(BM)和年龄对日粮可利用能量(DE)摄取的影响。在比较饲喂高脂日粮(HFD)的重体重动物和饲喂低脂日粮(LFD)的轻体重动物(BM差异高达60%)时,发现高脂日粮动物计算的DE摄食量显著高于低脂日粮动物(高达55%);但在100 g BM上计算DE摄食量时,差异不显著。因此,与高脂肪大鼠相比,低脂肪大鼠(饮食中含有高比例的蛋白质(70% (w/w))的可利用消化能摄入量没有减少。在体重较重的低脂动物和体重较轻的高脂动物(脂肪含量几乎没有差异)中,高脂动物(每只动物或每100克脂肪)比低脂动物吸收更多的有效消化能。这一差异达到60%,在统计上是显著的。在相同饲料条件下,轻体重大鼠与重体重大鼠DE/动物/100 g BM的摄取量比较表明,多数情况下,重体重大鼠DE/动物的摄取量显著高于重体重大鼠。由此可见,各饲粮组中体重较大的动物增重应归因于饲料的高效利用。体重轻的HFD动物比体重重的动物在粪便中排出更多的脂肪这一事实也表明了这一点。高脂肪动物排出的脂肪量是低脂肪动物排出的脂肪量的10倍。然而,当脂肪排泄量以摄入的日粮脂肪的百分比表示时,两种日粮的脂肪排泄量是相同的数量级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[Uptake of utilizable food energy by light-weight and heavy-weight rats fed a low-fat or high-fat diet].

The uptake of utilizable dietary energy (DE) as affected by diet (containing 3 or 50% (w/w)fat), body mass (BM) and age was investigated in male Wistar rats. In comparing heavy-weight animals fed the high-fat diet (HFD) with light-weight animals fed the low-fat diet (LFD) (differences in BM up to 60%), it was found that the uptakes of DE calculated on animal were significantly higher (up to 55%) in the HFD animals than in the LFD animals; but there were no significant differences when the uptakes of DE were calculated on 100 g BM. Thus, the LFD rats (the diet of which contained a high proportion of protein (70% (w/w)) exhibited no reduced uptakes of utilizable DE as compared to HFD rats. Of the heavy-weight LFD animals and the light-weight HFD animals which showed virtually no differences in BM, the HFD animals take up more utilizable DE (per animal or per 100 g BM) than the LFD animals. This difference, which amounts to 60%, is statistically significant. The comparison of the uptakes of DE/animal/100 g BM by light-weight rats with those by heavy-weight rats fed the same diet showed that the uptakes by the heavy-weight animals were in most cases significantly greater. Consequently, the greater BM of the heavy-weight animals of the respective diet groups must be attributed to more efficient utilization of feed. This is also indicated by the fact that the light-weight HFD animals excret more fat in the faeces than the heavy-weight animals. The amount of fat excreted by the HFD animals is some 10-fold greater than that excreted by the LFD animals. However, when the amount of excreted fat is expressed in % of ingested dietary fat, the fat excretion is of the same order of magnitude on both diets.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Effects of ochratoxin A on micronucleus frequency in human lymphocytes. Influence of UV radiation and nitrosamines on the induction of mycotoxins synthesis by nontoxigenic moulds isolated from feed samples. Nutritional and bacteriological properties of some game duck carcasses. Food allergies. What is meant by this expression? Is there an advantage in a marketing duty for allergic persons? New trends in nutrition--a new challenge for food science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1