印度尼西亚《绿色宪法》视角:绿色宪法观点

A. Supriyadi
{"title":"印度尼西亚《绿色宪法》视角:绿色宪法观点","authors":"A. Supriyadi","doi":"10.30641/ham.2023.14.17-40","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The green constitution concept in the Indonesian Constitution is the legal fundamental basis for environmental protection in implementing the national economy through public participation. The rationale for \"public participation\" as part of the rights of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights needs to be examined in Government Regulation instead of Law No. 2 of 2023 concerning Job Creation, passed into a legal act. This writing aims to analyze the components of public participation rights that the job creation act can potentially reduce, especially the provisions on the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) in enforcing the green constitution. This research is conducted based on normative legal research methods with statutory and conceptual approaches. The results of this research show that the rules for involving the community in preparing the EIA in the Job Creation Act differ from the green constitution principles in 2 (two) aspects. First, the limitation on community involvement in the Job Creation Act is potentially unconstitutional with the essence of the green constitution and the 1945 Constitution, which guarantees the right of public participation in the environmental field. Second, in the green constitution, the urgency of aspirations for public participation can become a consideration for making more transparent decisions in implementing an economy based on sustainable development. Restrictions on community involvement reduce the concept of a green constitution and potentially reduce the transparency in the granting of business permits in Indonesia which cannot mitigate the risk of environmental losses due to economic exploitation.","PeriodicalId":342655,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal HAM","volume":"14 6","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reduksi Hak Partisipasi publik Pada Aturan Analisis Mengenai Dampak Lingkungan untuk Perizinan Berusaha di Indonesia: Perspektif Green Constitution\",\"authors\":\"A. Supriyadi\",\"doi\":\"10.30641/ham.2023.14.17-40\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The green constitution concept in the Indonesian Constitution is the legal fundamental basis for environmental protection in implementing the national economy through public participation. The rationale for \\\"public participation\\\" as part of the rights of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights needs to be examined in Government Regulation instead of Law No. 2 of 2023 concerning Job Creation, passed into a legal act. This writing aims to analyze the components of public participation rights that the job creation act can potentially reduce, especially the provisions on the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) in enforcing the green constitution. This research is conducted based on normative legal research methods with statutory and conceptual approaches. The results of this research show that the rules for involving the community in preparing the EIA in the Job Creation Act differ from the green constitution principles in 2 (two) aspects. First, the limitation on community involvement in the Job Creation Act is potentially unconstitutional with the essence of the green constitution and the 1945 Constitution, which guarantees the right of public participation in the environmental field. Second, in the green constitution, the urgency of aspirations for public participation can become a consideration for making more transparent decisions in implementing an economy based on sustainable development. Restrictions on community involvement reduce the concept of a green constitution and potentially reduce the transparency in the granting of business permits in Indonesia which cannot mitigate the risk of environmental losses due to economic exploitation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":342655,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal HAM\",\"volume\":\"14 6\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal HAM\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30641/ham.2023.14.17-40\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal HAM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30641/ham.2023.14.17-40","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

印尼宪法中的绿色宪法理念是通过公众参与实施国民经济的环境保护的法律基础。作为《公民权利和政治权利国际公约》权利的一部分,“公众参与”的理由需要在政府条例中加以审查,而不是在关于创造就业机会的2023年第2号法律中加以审查。本文旨在分析创造就业法案可能减少的公众参与权利的组成部分,特别是在执行绿色宪法时关于环境影响评估(EIA)的规定。本研究以规范的法律研究方法为基础,采用成文法和概念性研究方法。研究结果表明,《创造就业法案》中社区参与环评编制的规则与绿色宪法原则在2个方面存在差异。首先,《创造就业法案》对社区参与的限制与绿色宪法和1945年宪法的本质相违背,后者保障了公众参与环境领域的权利。第二,在绿色宪法中,公众参与愿望的紧迫性可以成为在实施基于可持续发展的经济时做出更透明决策的考虑因素。对社区参与的限制削弱了绿色宪法的概念,并可能降低印度尼西亚颁发商业许可证的透明度,这无法减轻经济开发造成的环境损失风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Reduksi Hak Partisipasi publik Pada Aturan Analisis Mengenai Dampak Lingkungan untuk Perizinan Berusaha di Indonesia: Perspektif Green Constitution
The green constitution concept in the Indonesian Constitution is the legal fundamental basis for environmental protection in implementing the national economy through public participation. The rationale for "public participation" as part of the rights of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights needs to be examined in Government Regulation instead of Law No. 2 of 2023 concerning Job Creation, passed into a legal act. This writing aims to analyze the components of public participation rights that the job creation act can potentially reduce, especially the provisions on the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) in enforcing the green constitution. This research is conducted based on normative legal research methods with statutory and conceptual approaches. The results of this research show that the rules for involving the community in preparing the EIA in the Job Creation Act differ from the green constitution principles in 2 (two) aspects. First, the limitation on community involvement in the Job Creation Act is potentially unconstitutional with the essence of the green constitution and the 1945 Constitution, which guarantees the right of public participation in the environmental field. Second, in the green constitution, the urgency of aspirations for public participation can become a consideration for making more transparent decisions in implementing an economy based on sustainable development. Restrictions on community involvement reduce the concept of a green constitution and potentially reduce the transparency in the granting of business permits in Indonesia which cannot mitigate the risk of environmental losses due to economic exploitation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Reduksi Hak Partisipasi publik Pada Aturan Analisis Mengenai Dampak Lingkungan untuk Perizinan Berusaha di Indonesia: Perspektif Green Constitution Konstitusionalitas Hak Kesehatan Jiwa Warga Negara: Studi Kebijakan Penanggulangan Bunuh Diri di Kabupaten Gunungkidul Transwomen in Pandemic: Rights, Access and Exclusion The Social Construction of Transgender in Jember Regency After the Jember Fashion Carnival Event: A Human Rights Perspective Isomorfisme Institusional LPSK dalam Penegakan Hak Rehabilitasi Psikososial Korban Tindak Pidana di Indonesia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1