使用品牌的义务和不使用的法律后果

Yılmaz Yördem, Emrah Bi̇çi̇mli̇
{"title":"使用品牌的义务和不使用的法律后果","authors":"Yılmaz Yördem, Emrah Bi̇çi̇mli̇","doi":"10.54049/taad.1139381","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In our country, trademarks, patent-utility models, designs and geographical indications protected by four separate Statutory Decrees (KHK) adopted in 1995 have been brought together under the Industrial Property Law No. 6769. Therefore, the adoption of the Industrial Property Law (SMK) numbered 6769, which entered into force on 10.01.2017, is similar to the fact that 1995 is seen as a milestone in the doctrine due to the acceptance of the customs union with the European Union and being a party to the World Trade Organization (WTO)/TRIPS in our country. It can be said that it should be seen as a milestone in the field. \nIt is a very important issue that the regulations paralleling the European Union regulations regarding the use of the trademark are included in our legal system. The trademark owner, who registers the chosen trademark in the trademark registry and uses the trademark under the conditions stipulated in the Law, will be able to protect his trademark against third parties. In the Industrial Property Law, the way this use should be is explained and it is emphasized that it should be used seriously within the borders of Turkey in the class of goods or services for which the trademark is registered. In order to encourage the real use of the trademark and to prevent the trademarks from occupying an unnecessary place in the registry, the use of the trademark has been made mandatory by the law. Upon the request of the relevant persons, TÜRKPATENT may decide to cancel the trademarks that are not used by their owner within five years from the date of registration in the registry or whose use has been suspended for five years without a justifiable reason. \nPrinciples regarding the use of the trademark, Industrial Property Law No. 6769 9/1. According to the provision of the article, “A trademark that is not used seriously in Turkey by the trademark owner in terms of the goods or services for which it has been registered without a justifiable reason within five years from the date of registration or whose use has been interrupted for five years shall be decided to be cancelled”. Accordingly, within five years from the date of registration, if the trademark cannot be used seriously by the trademark owner in Turkey without a justifiable reason in terms of the goods or services for which it is registered, or if the usage is interrupted for five years, the trademark shall be cancelled. Therefore, in this sense, in order not to decide on the cancellation of the trademark, the trademark must be used seriously in Turkey by the trademark owner in accordance with its basic function in terms of the goods or services registered in the registry. \nUsing the trademark with different elements without changing its distinctive character, using it only in the goods or packaging for export purposes, and using it with the permission of the trademark owner are also included in the SMK. It is accepted to use the trademark within the meaning of paragraphs 9/2 and 3. It has been accepted that the cases considered as using the trademark are numbered and cannot be extended, on the grounds that the SMK is not understood from the related article wording and the extension of the conditions accepted for use will not be compatible with the purpose of introducing the obligation to use the trademark. As a matter of fact, Tekinalp stated that the cases considered to be used are clearly stated in the relevant law article and it is not possible to make additions except for these numbered cases. \nIn this article, especially, the burden of using the trademark and the legal consequences of this burden have been tried to be emphasized. In the study, legislative provisions, high court decisions, doctrine and scientific studies and international practices and regulations were used.","PeriodicalId":106262,"journal":{"name":"Türkiye Adalet Akademisi Dergisi","volume":"55 9","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Obligation to use the Brand and Legal Consequences of Non-Use\",\"authors\":\"Yılmaz Yördem, Emrah Bi̇çi̇mli̇\",\"doi\":\"10.54049/taad.1139381\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In our country, trademarks, patent-utility models, designs and geographical indications protected by four separate Statutory Decrees (KHK) adopted in 1995 have been brought together under the Industrial Property Law No. 6769. Therefore, the adoption of the Industrial Property Law (SMK) numbered 6769, which entered into force on 10.01.2017, is similar to the fact that 1995 is seen as a milestone in the doctrine due to the acceptance of the customs union with the European Union and being a party to the World Trade Organization (WTO)/TRIPS in our country. It can be said that it should be seen as a milestone in the field. \\nIt is a very important issue that the regulations paralleling the European Union regulations regarding the use of the trademark are included in our legal system. The trademark owner, who registers the chosen trademark in the trademark registry and uses the trademark under the conditions stipulated in the Law, will be able to protect his trademark against third parties. In the Industrial Property Law, the way this use should be is explained and it is emphasized that it should be used seriously within the borders of Turkey in the class of goods or services for which the trademark is registered. In order to encourage the real use of the trademark and to prevent the trademarks from occupying an unnecessary place in the registry, the use of the trademark has been made mandatory by the law. Upon the request of the relevant persons, TÜRKPATENT may decide to cancel the trademarks that are not used by their owner within five years from the date of registration in the registry or whose use has been suspended for five years without a justifiable reason. \\nPrinciples regarding the use of the trademark, Industrial Property Law No. 6769 9/1. According to the provision of the article, “A trademark that is not used seriously in Turkey by the trademark owner in terms of the goods or services for which it has been registered without a justifiable reason within five years from the date of registration or whose use has been interrupted for five years shall be decided to be cancelled”. Accordingly, within five years from the date of registration, if the trademark cannot be used seriously by the trademark owner in Turkey without a justifiable reason in terms of the goods or services for which it is registered, or if the usage is interrupted for five years, the trademark shall be cancelled. Therefore, in this sense, in order not to decide on the cancellation of the trademark, the trademark must be used seriously in Turkey by the trademark owner in accordance with its basic function in terms of the goods or services registered in the registry. \\nUsing the trademark with different elements without changing its distinctive character, using it only in the goods or packaging for export purposes, and using it with the permission of the trademark owner are also included in the SMK. It is accepted to use the trademark within the meaning of paragraphs 9/2 and 3. It has been accepted that the cases considered as using the trademark are numbered and cannot be extended, on the grounds that the SMK is not understood from the related article wording and the extension of the conditions accepted for use will not be compatible with the purpose of introducing the obligation to use the trademark. As a matter of fact, Tekinalp stated that the cases considered to be used are clearly stated in the relevant law article and it is not possible to make additions except for these numbered cases. \\nIn this article, especially, the burden of using the trademark and the legal consequences of this burden have been tried to be emphasized. In the study, legislative provisions, high court decisions, doctrine and scientific studies and international practices and regulations were used.\",\"PeriodicalId\":106262,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Türkiye Adalet Akademisi Dergisi\",\"volume\":\"55 9\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Türkiye Adalet Akademisi Dergisi\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54049/taad.1139381\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Türkiye Adalet Akademisi Dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54049/taad.1139381","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在我国,商标、专利实用新型、外观设计和地理标志受1995年通过的四项单独的法定法令(KHK)的保护,已纳入第6769号工业产权法。因此,编号为6769的《工业产权法》(SMK)于2017年1月10日生效,与1995年被视为该学说的里程碑类似,因为我国接受了与欧盟的关税同盟,并成为世界贸易组织(WTO)/TRIPS的缔约方。可以说,它应该被视为该领域的一个里程碑。在我国的法律体系中纳入与欧盟有关商标使用的相关规定是一个非常重要的问题。商标所有人在商标注册处注册了选定的商标,并按照法律规定的条件使用该商标,就可以保护其商标不受第三人的侵害。在《工业产权法》中,对这种使用方式进行了解释,并强调在土耳其境内,应在商标注册的商品或服务类别中认真使用该商标。为了鼓励商标的实际使用,防止商标在注册中占据不必要的位置,法律规定了商标的强制性使用。自注册之日起五年内未被商标所有人使用或者无正当理由被暂停使用五年的,TÜRKPATENT可以根据有关人员的请求,决定予以注销。关于商标使用的原则,《工业产权法》第6769 /1号。根据该条的规定,“商标所有人自注册之日起五年内无正当理由在其注册的商品或服务方面未在土耳其认真使用商标,或其使用被中断五年的,应决定取消”。因此,自注册之日起五年内,如果商标所有人在土耳其没有正当理由就其注册的商品或服务而言,不能认真使用该商标,或者如果使用中断了五年,该商标应被取消。因此,从这个意义上说,为了不决定撤销商标,商标所有人必须根据商标在注册中心注册的商品或服务方面的基本功能,在土耳其认真使用商标。在不改变商标特征的情况下使用不同元素的商标,仅在出口商品或包装上使用,以及经商标所有人许可使用的商标也包括在SMK范围内。在第9/2和第3款的含义范围内使用商标是被接受的。人们已经接受,被认为是使用商标的情况是有编号的,不能扩展,理由是SMK不能从相关条款的措辞中理解,并且接受使用条件的扩展将与引入使用商标义务的目的不相容。事实上,Tekinalp说,考虑使用的案例在有关法律条款中有明确规定,除了这些编号的案例外,不可能增加。本文着重论述了商标使用责任及其法律后果。在这项研究中,使用了立法规定、高等法院判决、理论和科学研究以及国际惯例和条例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Obligation to use the Brand and Legal Consequences of Non-Use
In our country, trademarks, patent-utility models, designs and geographical indications protected by four separate Statutory Decrees (KHK) adopted in 1995 have been brought together under the Industrial Property Law No. 6769. Therefore, the adoption of the Industrial Property Law (SMK) numbered 6769, which entered into force on 10.01.2017, is similar to the fact that 1995 is seen as a milestone in the doctrine due to the acceptance of the customs union with the European Union and being a party to the World Trade Organization (WTO)/TRIPS in our country. It can be said that it should be seen as a milestone in the field. It is a very important issue that the regulations paralleling the European Union regulations regarding the use of the trademark are included in our legal system. The trademark owner, who registers the chosen trademark in the trademark registry and uses the trademark under the conditions stipulated in the Law, will be able to protect his trademark against third parties. In the Industrial Property Law, the way this use should be is explained and it is emphasized that it should be used seriously within the borders of Turkey in the class of goods or services for which the trademark is registered. In order to encourage the real use of the trademark and to prevent the trademarks from occupying an unnecessary place in the registry, the use of the trademark has been made mandatory by the law. Upon the request of the relevant persons, TÜRKPATENT may decide to cancel the trademarks that are not used by their owner within five years from the date of registration in the registry or whose use has been suspended for five years without a justifiable reason. Principles regarding the use of the trademark, Industrial Property Law No. 6769 9/1. According to the provision of the article, “A trademark that is not used seriously in Turkey by the trademark owner in terms of the goods or services for which it has been registered without a justifiable reason within five years from the date of registration or whose use has been interrupted for five years shall be decided to be cancelled”. Accordingly, within five years from the date of registration, if the trademark cannot be used seriously by the trademark owner in Turkey without a justifiable reason in terms of the goods or services for which it is registered, or if the usage is interrupted for five years, the trademark shall be cancelled. Therefore, in this sense, in order not to decide on the cancellation of the trademark, the trademark must be used seriously in Turkey by the trademark owner in accordance with its basic function in terms of the goods or services registered in the registry. Using the trademark with different elements without changing its distinctive character, using it only in the goods or packaging for export purposes, and using it with the permission of the trademark owner are also included in the SMK. It is accepted to use the trademark within the meaning of paragraphs 9/2 and 3. It has been accepted that the cases considered as using the trademark are numbered and cannot be extended, on the grounds that the SMK is not understood from the related article wording and the extension of the conditions accepted for use will not be compatible with the purpose of introducing the obligation to use the trademark. As a matter of fact, Tekinalp stated that the cases considered to be used are clearly stated in the relevant law article and it is not possible to make additions except for these numbered cases. In this article, especially, the burden of using the trademark and the legal consequences of this burden have been tried to be emphasized. In the study, legislative provisions, high court decisions, doctrine and scientific studies and international practices and regulations were used.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Legal Situation of Unaccompanied Minors in Turkish Law The Authority of ICSID Tribunals for Suspension of Turkish Criminal Proceedings CEZAYA DEĞER HAKSIZLIĞIN FORMEL TESPİTİNDE PARÇA HAREKET TEORİSİ (TEIL-/ZWISCHENAKTSTHEORIE) VE HUKUKUMUZ BAKIMINDAN UYGULANABİLİRLİĞİ Evaluation of Provisions of Article 15 of the Cadastre Law Titled Partition and Partial Acaustion within the Framework of the Principle ANAYASA MAHKEMESİNİN TMK m. 187’NİN İPTALİNE İLİŞKİN KARARININ ANALİZİ VE DÜZENLEME ÖNERİSİ
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1