一个不可能的决定——被不确定性打断的生活

B. Djulbegovic
{"title":"一个不可能的决定——被不确定性打断的生活","authors":"B. Djulbegovic","doi":"10.5455/ijbh.2022.10.274-302","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The play tries to describe making important–life & death–medical decisions under uncertainty. While the overarching goal is to arrive at the most optimal, rational solution, the process of decision-making inherently involves human interactions – here between the patient, her husband, the doctor- fraught with emotions and navigated within immediate familiar and larger social and medical settings in the attempt to provide best possible and compassionate help to a human being afflicted with a life-threatening disease. The play revolves around the optimal choice of treatment for metastatic pancreatic cancer that a young 45-year-old woman and her family face: from not being treated to standard treatment to enrollment in various experimental studies. By covering most scientific concepts using dialogues between the real-life protagonists, the play attempts to show–and educate the broader public–how scientific progress is inevitably made because individuals (“made of flesh and blood”) have consented to participate in medical research while searching for the best solution for them as individuals. It uses a real-life example to answer an elusive ethical “triple aim”- arriving at a decision that respects the right of a person to decide as an autonomous human being, has the best possible chances to personally benefit from the treatments under consideration while contributing to knowledge that can help others in the future. Act 1: uncertainty about the diagnosis. Act 1, Scene 2: uncertainty about treatment (doctor’s office, after biopsy). Act 2,1: uncertainty about treatment (discussion at home). Act2, 2: decision. The annotations (endnotes) provide further explanations of the theoretical and philosophical concepts that were converted into the real-life drama of a patient facing a life-threatening disease. It attempts to demonstrate the central role of uncertainty that shape these decisions calling on science to help address them. The main goal of the play is to illustrate the applicability of many theoretical concepts of the science of uncertainty to real-life decision-making to show that they do matter to all of us individually and collectively. The author hopes that by converting the scientific, philosophical, and technical writings into this play, the public would benefit more from this text than hundreds of other scientific articles he has written on the topic.).","PeriodicalId":187078,"journal":{"name":"International Journal on Biomedicine and Healthcare","volume":"32 2","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Impossible Decision–the Life Interrupted by Uncertainty\",\"authors\":\"B. Djulbegovic\",\"doi\":\"10.5455/ijbh.2022.10.274-302\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The play tries to describe making important–life & death–medical decisions under uncertainty. While the overarching goal is to arrive at the most optimal, rational solution, the process of decision-making inherently involves human interactions – here between the patient, her husband, the doctor- fraught with emotions and navigated within immediate familiar and larger social and medical settings in the attempt to provide best possible and compassionate help to a human being afflicted with a life-threatening disease. The play revolves around the optimal choice of treatment for metastatic pancreatic cancer that a young 45-year-old woman and her family face: from not being treated to standard treatment to enrollment in various experimental studies. By covering most scientific concepts using dialogues between the real-life protagonists, the play attempts to show–and educate the broader public–how scientific progress is inevitably made because individuals (“made of flesh and blood”) have consented to participate in medical research while searching for the best solution for them as individuals. It uses a real-life example to answer an elusive ethical “triple aim”- arriving at a decision that respects the right of a person to decide as an autonomous human being, has the best possible chances to personally benefit from the treatments under consideration while contributing to knowledge that can help others in the future. Act 1: uncertainty about the diagnosis. Act 1, Scene 2: uncertainty about treatment (doctor’s office, after biopsy). Act 2,1: uncertainty about treatment (discussion at home). Act2, 2: decision. The annotations (endnotes) provide further explanations of the theoretical and philosophical concepts that were converted into the real-life drama of a patient facing a life-threatening disease. It attempts to demonstrate the central role of uncertainty that shape these decisions calling on science to help address them. The main goal of the play is to illustrate the applicability of many theoretical concepts of the science of uncertainty to real-life decision-making to show that they do matter to all of us individually and collectively. The author hopes that by converting the scientific, philosophical, and technical writings into this play, the public would benefit more from this text than hundreds of other scientific articles he has written on the topic.).\",\"PeriodicalId\":187078,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal on Biomedicine and Healthcare\",\"volume\":\"32 2\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal on Biomedicine and Healthcare\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5455/ijbh.2022.10.274-302\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal on Biomedicine and Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5455/ijbh.2022.10.274-302","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

该剧试图描述在不确定的情况下做出重要的生死医疗决定。虽然总体目标是达到最优、最合理的解决方案,但决策过程本身就涉及到人与人之间的互动——这里是病人、她的丈夫、医生之间的互动——充满了情绪,在直接熟悉的、更大的社会和医疗环境中导航,试图为患有危及生命的疾病的人提供最好的、富有同情心的帮助。该剧围绕着一位45岁的年轻女性和她的家人面临的转移性胰腺癌的最佳治疗选择:从不接受治疗到标准治疗,再到参加各种实验研究。通过使用现实生活中的主角之间的对话来涵盖大多数科学概念,该剧试图向更广泛的公众展示和教育科学进步是如何不可避免地取得的,因为个人(“血肉之躯”)同意参与医学研究,同时为他们作为个人寻找最佳解决方案。它用一个现实生活中的例子来回答一个难以捉摸的伦理“三重目标”——做出一个决定,尊重一个人作为一个自主的人做出决定的权利,有最好的机会从正在考虑的治疗中个人受益,同时贡献知识,可以在未来帮助他人。第一幕:诊断的不确定性。第一幕,第二场:治疗的不确定性(医生办公室,活检后)。第2,1幕:治疗的不确定性(在家讨论)。第2、2幕:决定。注释(尾注)提供了对理论和哲学概念的进一步解释,这些理论和哲学概念被转化为现实生活中面临威胁生命的疾病的病人的戏剧。它试图证明影响这些决定的不确定性的核心作用,呼吁科学帮助解决这些问题。该剧的主要目的是说明不确定性科学的许多理论概念在现实生活决策中的适用性,以表明它们对我们所有人个人和集体都很重要。作者希望通过将科学,哲学和技术著作转化为这个剧本,公众将从这个文本中受益比他写的其他数百篇关于这个主题的科学文章更多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
An Impossible Decision–the Life Interrupted by Uncertainty
The play tries to describe making important–life & death–medical decisions under uncertainty. While the overarching goal is to arrive at the most optimal, rational solution, the process of decision-making inherently involves human interactions – here between the patient, her husband, the doctor- fraught with emotions and navigated within immediate familiar and larger social and medical settings in the attempt to provide best possible and compassionate help to a human being afflicted with a life-threatening disease. The play revolves around the optimal choice of treatment for metastatic pancreatic cancer that a young 45-year-old woman and her family face: from not being treated to standard treatment to enrollment in various experimental studies. By covering most scientific concepts using dialogues between the real-life protagonists, the play attempts to show–and educate the broader public–how scientific progress is inevitably made because individuals (“made of flesh and blood”) have consented to participate in medical research while searching for the best solution for them as individuals. It uses a real-life example to answer an elusive ethical “triple aim”- arriving at a decision that respects the right of a person to decide as an autonomous human being, has the best possible chances to personally benefit from the treatments under consideration while contributing to knowledge that can help others in the future. Act 1: uncertainty about the diagnosis. Act 1, Scene 2: uncertainty about treatment (doctor’s office, after biopsy). Act 2,1: uncertainty about treatment (discussion at home). Act2, 2: decision. The annotations (endnotes) provide further explanations of the theoretical and philosophical concepts that were converted into the real-life drama of a patient facing a life-threatening disease. It attempts to demonstrate the central role of uncertainty that shape these decisions calling on science to help address them. The main goal of the play is to illustrate the applicability of many theoretical concepts of the science of uncertainty to real-life decision-making to show that they do matter to all of us individually and collectively. The author hopes that by converting the scientific, philosophical, and technical writings into this play, the public would benefit more from this text than hundreds of other scientific articles he has written on the topic.).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Use of Expert Systems and Information and Communicaton Tchnologies (ICT) in Laboratory Practice–an Economical Aspects Evaluation of Dental Health Care Efficiency in Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina During Eight Years' Time Frame Intraosseous Lipoma of the Jaws: An Overview Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) Metabolic Syndrome and its Predictors in an Urban Population in the Gambia: a Cross Sectional Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1