{"title":"危害人身健康犯罪刑事责任的社会条件性","authors":"K. Katerynchuk","doi":"10.36059/978-966-397-113-1/176-195","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION Development of Ukraine as sovereign, independent, democratic, social and law-governed state requires regulation of certain public relations through the prism of law. It is the adoption of criminal-legal norms that is the evidence of the fact that the state, from the point of view of social necessity, makes decisions to impose some socially dangerous bans. The first step (stage) of criminal-legal norm “birth” is its conditionality, namely, factors being the recondition of further criminalization of one or another action, resulted in appropriate consolidation of the norm in regulatory legal act such as the Criminal Code of Ukraine. Legal imposition of new criminal-legal bans has to be reasonable, scientifically justified and meets the needs of society development 1 . A mechanism of social conditionality of law includes the following stages: – Emergence of the necessity to regulate certain relations legally; – Public opinion formation and the activity of state competent authority on legal norm adoption – law-making activity. That is why “... one should understand under the social conditionality of law the compliance, adequacy of law to public relations regulated, its ability to reflect objective needs of public life. The property of social conditionality of law is expressed in the fact that, first of all, the law should be a dynamic system, reacting tactfully to the changes in social reality” 2 . For example, M. J. Korzhansky stated that “social conditionality of criminallegal protection is determined, in general, by social worth of public relations, economic factors and by the efficiency of legal protection” 3 .","PeriodicalId":253937,"journal":{"name":"THEORETICAL AND PRACTICAL ASPECTS OF MODERN JURISPRUDENCE DEVELOPMENT: THE EXPERIENCE OF EUROPEAN COUNTRIES AND PROSPECTS FOR UKRAINE","volume":" 21","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"SOCIAL CONDITIONALITY OF CRIMINAL LIABILITY OF CRIMES AGAINST PERSON’S HEALTH\",\"authors\":\"K. Katerynchuk\",\"doi\":\"10.36059/978-966-397-113-1/176-195\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"INTRODUCTION Development of Ukraine as sovereign, independent, democratic, social and law-governed state requires regulation of certain public relations through the prism of law. It is the adoption of criminal-legal norms that is the evidence of the fact that the state, from the point of view of social necessity, makes decisions to impose some socially dangerous bans. The first step (stage) of criminal-legal norm “birth” is its conditionality, namely, factors being the recondition of further criminalization of one or another action, resulted in appropriate consolidation of the norm in regulatory legal act such as the Criminal Code of Ukraine. Legal imposition of new criminal-legal bans has to be reasonable, scientifically justified and meets the needs of society development 1 . A mechanism of social conditionality of law includes the following stages: – Emergence of the necessity to regulate certain relations legally; – Public opinion formation and the activity of state competent authority on legal norm adoption – law-making activity. That is why “... one should understand under the social conditionality of law the compliance, adequacy of law to public relations regulated, its ability to reflect objective needs of public life. The property of social conditionality of law is expressed in the fact that, first of all, the law should be a dynamic system, reacting tactfully to the changes in social reality” 2 . For example, M. J. Korzhansky stated that “social conditionality of criminallegal protection is determined, in general, by social worth of public relations, economic factors and by the efficiency of legal protection” 3 .\",\"PeriodicalId\":253937,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"THEORETICAL AND PRACTICAL ASPECTS OF MODERN JURISPRUDENCE DEVELOPMENT: THE EXPERIENCE OF EUROPEAN COUNTRIES AND PROSPECTS FOR UKRAINE\",\"volume\":\" 21\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"THEORETICAL AND PRACTICAL ASPECTS OF MODERN JURISPRUDENCE DEVELOPMENT: THE EXPERIENCE OF EUROPEAN COUNTRIES AND PROSPECTS FOR UKRAINE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36059/978-966-397-113-1/176-195\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"THEORETICAL AND PRACTICAL ASPECTS OF MODERN JURISPRUDENCE DEVELOPMENT: THE EXPERIENCE OF EUROPEAN COUNTRIES AND PROSPECTS FOR UKRAINE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36059/978-966-397-113-1/176-195","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
乌克兰作为主权、独立、民主、社会和法治国家的发展需要通过法律的棱镜来调节某些公共关系。正是刑事法律规范的采用证明了这样一个事实,即从社会必要性的角度来看,国家决定实施一些具有社会危险性的禁令。刑法规范“诞生”的第一步(阶段)是其条件性,即对一种或另一种行为进行进一步刑事化的因素,导致规范在乌克兰刑法等规范性法律行为中得到适当的巩固。新的刑事法律禁令的法律实施必须是合理的,科学的,符合社会发展的需要。法律的社会条件性机制包括以下几个阶段:-法律规范某些关系的必要性的出现;-舆论形成和国家主管机关对法律规范采纳的活动-立法活动。这就是为什么……要理解法律在社会条件下对公共关系的合规性、充分性及其反映公共生活客观需要的能力。法律的社会制约性表现为:首先,法律应当是一个动态的系统,对社会现实的变化作出机智的反应。例如,M. J. Korzhansky指出,“刑事法律保护的社会条件一般由公共关系的社会价值、经济因素和法律保护的效率决定”。
SOCIAL CONDITIONALITY OF CRIMINAL LIABILITY OF CRIMES AGAINST PERSON’S HEALTH
INTRODUCTION Development of Ukraine as sovereign, independent, democratic, social and law-governed state requires regulation of certain public relations through the prism of law. It is the adoption of criminal-legal norms that is the evidence of the fact that the state, from the point of view of social necessity, makes decisions to impose some socially dangerous bans. The first step (stage) of criminal-legal norm “birth” is its conditionality, namely, factors being the recondition of further criminalization of one or another action, resulted in appropriate consolidation of the norm in regulatory legal act such as the Criminal Code of Ukraine. Legal imposition of new criminal-legal bans has to be reasonable, scientifically justified and meets the needs of society development 1 . A mechanism of social conditionality of law includes the following stages: – Emergence of the necessity to regulate certain relations legally; – Public opinion formation and the activity of state competent authority on legal norm adoption – law-making activity. That is why “... one should understand under the social conditionality of law the compliance, adequacy of law to public relations regulated, its ability to reflect objective needs of public life. The property of social conditionality of law is expressed in the fact that, first of all, the law should be a dynamic system, reacting tactfully to the changes in social reality” 2 . For example, M. J. Korzhansky stated that “social conditionality of criminallegal protection is determined, in general, by social worth of public relations, economic factors and by the efficiency of legal protection” 3 .