存储转发和穿透弹性分组环的分组传输延迟比较

D. Schupke, A. Riedl
{"title":"存储转发和穿透弹性分组环的分组传输延迟比较","authors":"D. Schupke, A. Riedl","doi":"10.1109/IZSBC.2002.991752","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Based on queuing theory we develop analytical approximations for the average packet transfer time of a store-and-forward and a cut-through buffer insertion ring with two client traffic priorities. These types of rings are architectural alternatives for resilient packet rings (RPR) which transport data (e.g., IP) packets over optical media. We use the approximations for a delay comparison of both ring architectures. It turns out that high priority traffic is more delayed in the cut-through architecture than in the store-and-forward architecture whereas low priority traffic performs similarly in both architectures.","PeriodicalId":336991,"journal":{"name":"2002 International Zurich Seminar on Broadband Communications Access - Transmission - Networking (Cat. No.02TH8599)","volume":"46 2","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"21","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Packet transfer delay comparison of a store-and-forward and a cut-through resilient packet ring\",\"authors\":\"D. Schupke, A. Riedl\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/IZSBC.2002.991752\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Based on queuing theory we develop analytical approximations for the average packet transfer time of a store-and-forward and a cut-through buffer insertion ring with two client traffic priorities. These types of rings are architectural alternatives for resilient packet rings (RPR) which transport data (e.g., IP) packets over optical media. We use the approximations for a delay comparison of both ring architectures. It turns out that high priority traffic is more delayed in the cut-through architecture than in the store-and-forward architecture whereas low priority traffic performs similarly in both architectures.\",\"PeriodicalId\":336991,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2002 International Zurich Seminar on Broadband Communications Access - Transmission - Networking (Cat. No.02TH8599)\",\"volume\":\"46 2\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2002-08-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"21\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2002 International Zurich Seminar on Broadband Communications Access - Transmission - Networking (Cat. No.02TH8599)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/IZSBC.2002.991752\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2002 International Zurich Seminar on Broadband Communications Access - Transmission - Networking (Cat. No.02TH8599)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IZSBC.2002.991752","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21

摘要

基于排队论,我们开发了具有两个客户端流量优先级的存储转发和穿透缓冲区插入环的平均数据包传输时间的解析近似。这些类型的环是弹性分组环(RPR)的架构替代方案,RPR通过光学介质传输数据(例如IP)分组。我们使用近似来比较两种环结构的延迟。事实证明,高优先级流量在直通架构中比在存储转发架构中延迟更大,而低优先级流量在两种架构中的表现相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Packet transfer delay comparison of a store-and-forward and a cut-through resilient packet ring
Based on queuing theory we develop analytical approximations for the average packet transfer time of a store-and-forward and a cut-through buffer insertion ring with two client traffic priorities. These types of rings are architectural alternatives for resilient packet rings (RPR) which transport data (e.g., IP) packets over optical media. We use the approximations for a delay comparison of both ring architectures. It turns out that high priority traffic is more delayed in the cut-through architecture than in the store-and-forward architecture whereas low priority traffic performs similarly in both architectures.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
An iterative procedure for semi-blind symbol estimation in a multipath SISO channel context exploiting finite alphabet properties Multistage DS-CDMA receivers with pathwise interference mitigation Weight convergence analysis of adaptive array antennas based on SMI algorithm Analysis on coverage and capacity in adoption of repeater systems in CDMA2000 Transmit antenna diversity for OFDM-based W-LANs with a priori channel state information
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1