你只需要听听:《Hitweek》的摇滚评论。摇滚乐评价域的分类模型。

A. None
{"title":"你只需要听听:《Hitweek》的摇滚评论。摇滚乐评价域的分类模型。","authors":"A. None","doi":"10.21825/jeps.81952","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Rock criticism plays an important role in the formation of rock music as a cultural field in the 1960s. Criticism provides legitimization of taste, canonization and consecration. Nevertheless, the arguments and evaluations within rock criticism have been marginally studied, if at all in the Netherlands. Especially when you compare how literary criticism in its turn is studied as part of Dutch literary theory (see among others Van Rees 1985, Janssen 1994, and Van Dijk 2006). Rock criticism is mostly studied in cultural and music sociology. This research focuses on rock criticism as part of a cultural field (Lindberg et al. 2005). Within the humanities, the study of rock criticism offers an opportunity to map out which arguments are used in criticism and how they are applied.\nIn research into literary criticism, Mooij, Boonstra, Praamstra, and, following them, Op de Beek and Linders, among others, categorize evaluative statements by critics. I will elaborate on their work in the categorisation of evaluative statements by rock critics. In this article, the categorization model of Op de Beek and Linders is applied and adapted to rock criticism. The corpus of this paper is the archive of Hitweek (1965). A Dutch magazine that appears weekly between 1965 and 1969 (in approximately 190 editions) and pays ample attention to Dutch rock music as part of youth culture. Hitweek is the first critical music magazine for rock music in the Netherlands and is therefore important for the formation of the cultural field of rock music in the Netherlands. For this study, the evaluative statements in the reviews of singles and albums by Dutch bands were examined. The statements are categorized and grouped to provide a picture of what criteria the reviewers of Hitweek used and how the model can help determine these criteria.\nThis article is one of the few studies into evaluation criteria within Dutch rock criticism. For the time being, it is the only research into the evaluation criteria in Hitweek.","PeriodicalId":142850,"journal":{"name":"Journal of European Periodical Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Oeioei you just have to listen : Rock criticism in Hitweek. A categorization model for evaluation domains in rock music.\",\"authors\":\"A. None\",\"doi\":\"10.21825/jeps.81952\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Rock criticism plays an important role in the formation of rock music as a cultural field in the 1960s. Criticism provides legitimization of taste, canonization and consecration. Nevertheless, the arguments and evaluations within rock criticism have been marginally studied, if at all in the Netherlands. Especially when you compare how literary criticism in its turn is studied as part of Dutch literary theory (see among others Van Rees 1985, Janssen 1994, and Van Dijk 2006). Rock criticism is mostly studied in cultural and music sociology. This research focuses on rock criticism as part of a cultural field (Lindberg et al. 2005). Within the humanities, the study of rock criticism offers an opportunity to map out which arguments are used in criticism and how they are applied.\\nIn research into literary criticism, Mooij, Boonstra, Praamstra, and, following them, Op de Beek and Linders, among others, categorize evaluative statements by critics. I will elaborate on their work in the categorisation of evaluative statements by rock critics. In this article, the categorization model of Op de Beek and Linders is applied and adapted to rock criticism. The corpus of this paper is the archive of Hitweek (1965). A Dutch magazine that appears weekly between 1965 and 1969 (in approximately 190 editions) and pays ample attention to Dutch rock music as part of youth culture. Hitweek is the first critical music magazine for rock music in the Netherlands and is therefore important for the formation of the cultural field of rock music in the Netherlands. For this study, the evaluative statements in the reviews of singles and albums by Dutch bands were examined. The statements are categorized and grouped to provide a picture of what criteria the reviewers of Hitweek used and how the model can help determine these criteria.\\nThis article is one of the few studies into evaluation criteria within Dutch rock criticism. For the time being, it is the only research into the evaluation criteria in Hitweek.\",\"PeriodicalId\":142850,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of European Periodical Studies\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of European Periodical Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21825/jeps.81952\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of European Periodical Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21825/jeps.81952","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在20世纪60年代摇滚乐作为一个文化领域的形成过程中,摇滚批评起到了重要的作用。批评使趣味合法化,使之成为圣徒,使之神圣化。然而,在荷兰,对摇滚批评界的争论和评价的研究很少。尤其是当你比较文学批评作为荷兰文学理论的一部分是如何被研究的(参见Van Rees 1985, Janssen 1994和Van Dijk 2006)。摇滚批评主要在文化和音乐社会学中进行研究。这项研究将摇滚批评作为文化领域的一部分(Lindberg et al. 2005)。在人文学科中,对岩石批评的研究提供了一个机会,可以找出批评中使用了哪些论点以及它们是如何应用的。在对文学批评的研究中,Mooij、Boonstra、Praamstra以及之后的Op de Beek和Linders等人对评论家的评价性陈述进行了分类。我将在摇滚评论家的评价性陈述分类中详细阐述他们的工作。本文将Op de Beek和Linders的分类模型应用于摇滚批评。本文的语料库是Hitweek(1965)的档案。荷兰杂志,1965年至1969年间每周出版一次(大约有190版),对荷兰摇滚音乐作为青年文化的一部分给予了充分的关注。《Hitweek》是荷兰第一本摇滚音乐评论杂志,对荷兰摇滚音乐文化领域的形成具有重要意义。在这项研究中,我们考察了荷兰乐队对单曲和专辑的评论中的评价性陈述。这些语句被分类和分组,以提供Hitweek评论者使用的标准以及模型如何帮助确定这些标准的图片。本文是为数不多的研究荷兰摇滚评论评价标准的文章之一。目前,这是《Hitweek》杂志对评价标准的唯一研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Oeioei you just have to listen : Rock criticism in Hitweek. A categorization model for evaluation domains in rock music.
Rock criticism plays an important role in the formation of rock music as a cultural field in the 1960s. Criticism provides legitimization of taste, canonization and consecration. Nevertheless, the arguments and evaluations within rock criticism have been marginally studied, if at all in the Netherlands. Especially when you compare how literary criticism in its turn is studied as part of Dutch literary theory (see among others Van Rees 1985, Janssen 1994, and Van Dijk 2006). Rock criticism is mostly studied in cultural and music sociology. This research focuses on rock criticism as part of a cultural field (Lindberg et al. 2005). Within the humanities, the study of rock criticism offers an opportunity to map out which arguments are used in criticism and how they are applied. In research into literary criticism, Mooij, Boonstra, Praamstra, and, following them, Op de Beek and Linders, among others, categorize evaluative statements by critics. I will elaborate on their work in the categorisation of evaluative statements by rock critics. In this article, the categorization model of Op de Beek and Linders is applied and adapted to rock criticism. The corpus of this paper is the archive of Hitweek (1965). A Dutch magazine that appears weekly between 1965 and 1969 (in approximately 190 editions) and pays ample attention to Dutch rock music as part of youth culture. Hitweek is the first critical music magazine for rock music in the Netherlands and is therefore important for the formation of the cultural field of rock music in the Netherlands. For this study, the evaluative statements in the reviews of singles and albums by Dutch bands were examined. The statements are categorized and grouped to provide a picture of what criteria the reviewers of Hitweek used and how the model can help determine these criteria. This article is one of the few studies into evaluation criteria within Dutch rock criticism. For the time being, it is the only research into the evaluation criteria in Hitweek.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Ambiguities of Contempt for the Folliculaires in Eighteenth-Century France How to Avoid Making False Friends: Taking the Multilingual Turn in Periodical Studies An Analysis of the coverage of the 2008 presidential election campaign in periodical press in Cyprus Joyce and his Apostles: The Exchange of Capital between Joyce and transition 'Truth is Stranger than Fiction': Representations of Greece in the Wide World Magazine
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1