查询可见和不可见信息

Michael Benedikt, P. Bourhis, B. T. Cate, G. Puppis
{"title":"查询可见和不可见信息","authors":"Michael Benedikt, P. Bourhis, B. T. Cate, G. Puppis","doi":"10.1145/2933575.2935306","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We provide a wide-ranging study of the scenario where a subset of the relations in the schema are visible — that is, their complete contents are known — while the remaining relations are invisible. We also have integrity constraints (invariants given by logical sentences) which may relate the visible relations to the invisible ones. We want to determine which information about a query (a positive existential sentence) can be inferred from the visible instance and the constraints. We consider both positive and negative query information, that is, whether the query or its negation holds. We consider the instance-level version of the problem, where both the query and the visible instance are given, as well as the schema-level version, where we want to know whether truth or falsity of the query can be inferred in some instance of the schema.","PeriodicalId":206395,"journal":{"name":"2016 31st Annual ACM/IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science (LICS)","volume":"99 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"20","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Querying Visible and Invisible Information\",\"authors\":\"Michael Benedikt, P. Bourhis, B. T. Cate, G. Puppis\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/2933575.2935306\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We provide a wide-ranging study of the scenario where a subset of the relations in the schema are visible — that is, their complete contents are known — while the remaining relations are invisible. We also have integrity constraints (invariants given by logical sentences) which may relate the visible relations to the invisible ones. We want to determine which information about a query (a positive existential sentence) can be inferred from the visible instance and the constraints. We consider both positive and negative query information, that is, whether the query or its negation holds. We consider the instance-level version of the problem, where both the query and the visible instance are given, as well as the schema-level version, where we want to know whether truth or falsity of the query can be inferred in some instance of the schema.\",\"PeriodicalId\":206395,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2016 31st Annual ACM/IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science (LICS)\",\"volume\":\"99 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-07-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"20\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2016 31st Annual ACM/IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science (LICS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/2933575.2935306\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 31st Annual ACM/IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science (LICS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2933575.2935306","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20

摘要

我们提供了一个广泛的场景研究,其中模式中的关系子集是可见的——也就是说,它们的完整内容是已知的——而其余关系是不可见的。我们也有完整性约束(由逻辑句子给出的不变量),它可以将可见的关系与不可见的关系联系起来。我们想要确定可以从可见实例和约束中推断出关于查询(肯定存在句)的哪些信息。我们同时考虑正查询信息和负查询信息,也就是说,查询及其否定是否成立。我们考虑问题的实例级版本,其中给出了查询和可见实例,以及模式级版本,其中我们想知道查询的真假是否可以在模式的某些实例中推断出来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Querying Visible and Invisible Information
We provide a wide-ranging study of the scenario where a subset of the relations in the schema are visible — that is, their complete contents are known — while the remaining relations are invisible. We also have integrity constraints (invariants given by logical sentences) which may relate the visible relations to the invisible ones. We want to determine which information about a query (a positive existential sentence) can be inferred from the visible instance and the constraints. We consider both positive and negative query information, that is, whether the query or its negation holds. We consider the instance-level version of the problem, where both the query and the visible instance are given, as well as the schema-level version, where we want to know whether truth or falsity of the query can be inferred in some instance of the schema.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Quantitative Algebraic Reasoning Differential Refinement Logic* Minimization of Symbolic Tree Automata Graphs of relational structures: restricted types The Complexity of Coverability in ν-Petri Nets
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1