关于在GITHuB上采用TODO Bot:初步研究

Hamid Mohayeji, Felipe Ebert, Eric Arts, Eleni Constantinou, Alexander Serebrenik
{"title":"关于在GITHuB上采用TODO Bot:初步研究","authors":"Hamid Mohayeji, Felipe Ebert, Eric Arts, Eleni Constantinou, Alexander Serebrenik","doi":"10.1145/3528228.3528408","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Bots support different software maintenance and evolution activities, such as code review or executing tests. Recently, several bots have been proposed to help developers to keep track of postponed activities, expressed by means of TODO comments: e.g., TODO Bot automatically creates a GITHuB issue when a TODO comment is added to a repository, increasing visibility of TODO comments. In this work, we perform a preliminary evaluation of the impact of the TODO Bot on software development practice. We conjecture that the introduction of the TODO Bot would facilitate keeping track of the TODO comments, and hence encourage developers to use more TODO comments in their code changes. To evaluate this conjecture, we analyze all the 2,208 repositories which have at least one GITHuB issue created by the TODO Bot. Firstly, we investigate to what extent the bot is being used and describe the repositories using the bot. We observe that the majority (54%) of the repositories which adopted the TODO Bot are new, i.e., were created within less than one month of first issue created by the bot, and from those, more than 60% have the issue created within three days. We observe a statistically significant increase in the number of the TODO comments after the adoption of the bot, however with a small effect size. Our results suggest that the adoption of the TODO Bot encourages developers to introduce TODO comments rendering the postponed decisions more visible. Nevertheless, it does not speed up the process of addressing TODO comments or corresponding GITHuB issues.","PeriodicalId":431263,"journal":{"name":"2022 IEEE/ACM 4th International Workshop on Bots in Software Engineering (BotSE)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On the Adoption of a TODO Bot on GITHuB: A Preliminary Study\",\"authors\":\"Hamid Mohayeji, Felipe Ebert, Eric Arts, Eleni Constantinou, Alexander Serebrenik\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3528228.3528408\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Bots support different software maintenance and evolution activities, such as code review or executing tests. Recently, several bots have been proposed to help developers to keep track of postponed activities, expressed by means of TODO comments: e.g., TODO Bot automatically creates a GITHuB issue when a TODO comment is added to a repository, increasing visibility of TODO comments. In this work, we perform a preliminary evaluation of the impact of the TODO Bot on software development practice. We conjecture that the introduction of the TODO Bot would facilitate keeping track of the TODO comments, and hence encourage developers to use more TODO comments in their code changes. To evaluate this conjecture, we analyze all the 2,208 repositories which have at least one GITHuB issue created by the TODO Bot. Firstly, we investigate to what extent the bot is being used and describe the repositories using the bot. We observe that the majority (54%) of the repositories which adopted the TODO Bot are new, i.e., were created within less than one month of first issue created by the bot, and from those, more than 60% have the issue created within three days. We observe a statistically significant increase in the number of the TODO comments after the adoption of the bot, however with a small effect size. Our results suggest that the adoption of the TODO Bot encourages developers to introduce TODO comments rendering the postponed decisions more visible. Nevertheless, it does not speed up the process of addressing TODO comments or corresponding GITHuB issues.\",\"PeriodicalId\":431263,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2022 IEEE/ACM 4th International Workshop on Bots in Software Engineering (BotSE)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2022 IEEE/ACM 4th International Workshop on Bots in Software Engineering (BotSE)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3528228.3528408\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 IEEE/ACM 4th International Workshop on Bots in Software Engineering (BotSE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3528228.3528408","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

bot支持不同的软件维护和发展活动,例如代码审查或执行测试。最近,有人提出了几个机器人来帮助开发人员跟踪延迟的活动,通过TODO注释来表达:例如,当TODO注释被添加到存储库时,TODO Bot会自动创建一个GITHuB问题,增加了TODO注释的可见性。在这项工作中,我们对TODO Bot对软件开发实践的影响进行了初步评估。我们推测,引入TODO Bot将有助于跟踪TODO注释,从而鼓励开发人员在他们的代码更改中使用更多的TODO注释。为了评估这个猜想,我们分析了所有2208个库,这些库至少有一个由TODO Bot创建的GITHuB问题。首先,我们调查了机器人的使用程度,并描述了使用机器人的存储库。我们观察到,大多数(54%)采用TODO Bot的仓库是新的,即在Bot创建第一个问题后不到一个月内创建的,从这些仓库中,超过60%的问题是在三天内创建的。我们观察到,在采用bot后,TODO评论的数量在统计上显着增加,但效应大小较小。我们的研究结果表明,采用TODO Bot可以鼓励开发人员引入TODO注释,从而使推迟的决策更加明显。然而,它并没有加快解决TODO注释或相应的GITHuB问题的过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
On the Adoption of a TODO Bot on GITHuB: A Preliminary Study
Bots support different software maintenance and evolution activities, such as code review or executing tests. Recently, several bots have been proposed to help developers to keep track of postponed activities, expressed by means of TODO comments: e.g., TODO Bot automatically creates a GITHuB issue when a TODO comment is added to a repository, increasing visibility of TODO comments. In this work, we perform a preliminary evaluation of the impact of the TODO Bot on software development practice. We conjecture that the introduction of the TODO Bot would facilitate keeping track of the TODO comments, and hence encourage developers to use more TODO comments in their code changes. To evaluate this conjecture, we analyze all the 2,208 repositories which have at least one GITHuB issue created by the TODO Bot. Firstly, we investigate to what extent the bot is being used and describe the repositories using the bot. We observe that the majority (54%) of the repositories which adopted the TODO Bot are new, i.e., were created within less than one month of first issue created by the bot, and from those, more than 60% have the issue created within three days. We observe a statistically significant increase in the number of the TODO comments after the adoption of the bot, however with a small effect size. Our results suggest that the adoption of the TODO Bot encourages developers to introduce TODO comments rendering the postponed decisions more visible. Nevertheless, it does not speed up the process of addressing TODO comments or corresponding GITHuB issues.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
On the Adoption of a TODO Bot on GITHuB: A Preliminary Study Classifying Issues into Custom Labels in GitBot Survey of Automation Practices in Model-Driven Development and Operations On the Accuracy of Bot Detection Techniques An Exploratory Study of Reactions to Bot Comments on GitHub
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1