使用本体进行企业架构分析

Gonçalo Antunes, Marzieh Bakhshandeh, Rudolf Mayer, J. Borbinha, A. Caetano
{"title":"使用本体进行企业架构分析","authors":"Gonçalo Antunes, Marzieh Bakhshandeh, Rudolf Mayer, J. Borbinha, A. Caetano","doi":"10.1109/EDOCW.2013.47","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Enterprise architecture aligns business and information technology through the management of different elements and domains. An architecture description encompasses a wide and heterogeneous spectrum of areas, such as business processes, metrics, application components, people and technological infrastructure. Views express the elements and relationships of one or more domains from the perspective of specific system concerns relevant to one or more of its stakeholders. As a result, each view needs to be expressed in the description language that best suits its concerns. However, enterprise architecture languages tend to advocate a rigid \"one-model fits all\" approach where an all-encompassing description language describes several architectural domains. This approach hinders extensibility and adds complexity to the overall description language. On the other hand, integrating multiple models raises several challenges at the level of model coherence, consistency and trace ability. Moreover, EA models should be computable so that the effort involved in their analysis is manageable. This work advocates the employment of ontologies and associated techniques in EA for contributing to the solving of the aforementioned issues. Thus, a proposal is made comprising an extensible architecture that consists of a core domain-independent ontology that can be extended through the integration of domain-specific ontologies focusing on specific concerns. The proposal is demonstrated through a real-world evaluation scenario involving the analysis of the models according to the requirements of the scenario stakeholders.","PeriodicalId":376599,"journal":{"name":"2013 17th IEEE International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference Workshops","volume":"71 7","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"33","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using Ontologies for Enterprise Architecture Analysis\",\"authors\":\"Gonçalo Antunes, Marzieh Bakhshandeh, Rudolf Mayer, J. Borbinha, A. Caetano\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/EDOCW.2013.47\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Enterprise architecture aligns business and information technology through the management of different elements and domains. An architecture description encompasses a wide and heterogeneous spectrum of areas, such as business processes, metrics, application components, people and technological infrastructure. Views express the elements and relationships of one or more domains from the perspective of specific system concerns relevant to one or more of its stakeholders. As a result, each view needs to be expressed in the description language that best suits its concerns. However, enterprise architecture languages tend to advocate a rigid \\\"one-model fits all\\\" approach where an all-encompassing description language describes several architectural domains. This approach hinders extensibility and adds complexity to the overall description language. On the other hand, integrating multiple models raises several challenges at the level of model coherence, consistency and trace ability. Moreover, EA models should be computable so that the effort involved in their analysis is manageable. This work advocates the employment of ontologies and associated techniques in EA for contributing to the solving of the aforementioned issues. Thus, a proposal is made comprising an extensible architecture that consists of a core domain-independent ontology that can be extended through the integration of domain-specific ontologies focusing on specific concerns. The proposal is demonstrated through a real-world evaluation scenario involving the analysis of the models according to the requirements of the scenario stakeholders.\",\"PeriodicalId\":376599,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2013 17th IEEE International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference Workshops\",\"volume\":\"71 7\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-09-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"33\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2013 17th IEEE International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference Workshops\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/EDOCW.2013.47\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2013 17th IEEE International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference Workshops","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/EDOCW.2013.47","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 33

摘要

企业架构通过管理不同的元素和领域来协调业务和信息技术。体系结构描述包含广泛且异构的领域,例如业务流程、度量、应用程序组件、人员和技术基础设施。视图从与一个或多个涉众相关的特定系统关注点的角度表达一个或多个域的元素和关系。因此,每个视图都需要用最适合其关注点的描述语言来表达。然而,企业架构语言倾向于提倡一种严格的“一个模型适合所有人”的方法,在这种方法中,一个包罗万象的描述语言描述几个架构领域。这种方法阻碍了可扩展性,并增加了整个描述语言的复杂性。另一方面,集成多个模型在模型一致性、一致性和可追溯性方面提出了一些挑战。此外,EA模型应该是可计算的,以便分析中涉及的工作是可管理的。这项工作提倡在EA中使用本体和相关技术来帮助解决上述问题。因此,建议包含一个可扩展的体系结构,该体系结构由一个核心领域独立的本体组成,该本体可以通过集成专注于特定关注点的领域特定本体进行扩展。该建议通过一个真实世界的评估场景进行演示,该评估场景包括根据场景涉众的需求对模型进行分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Using Ontologies for Enterprise Architecture Analysis
Enterprise architecture aligns business and information technology through the management of different elements and domains. An architecture description encompasses a wide and heterogeneous spectrum of areas, such as business processes, metrics, application components, people and technological infrastructure. Views express the elements and relationships of one or more domains from the perspective of specific system concerns relevant to one or more of its stakeholders. As a result, each view needs to be expressed in the description language that best suits its concerns. However, enterprise architecture languages tend to advocate a rigid "one-model fits all" approach where an all-encompassing description language describes several architectural domains. This approach hinders extensibility and adds complexity to the overall description language. On the other hand, integrating multiple models raises several challenges at the level of model coherence, consistency and trace ability. Moreover, EA models should be computable so that the effort involved in their analysis is manageable. This work advocates the employment of ontologies and associated techniques in EA for contributing to the solving of the aforementioned issues. Thus, a proposal is made comprising an extensible architecture that consists of a core domain-independent ontology that can be extended through the integration of domain-specific ontologies focusing on specific concerns. The proposal is demonstrated through a real-world evaluation scenario involving the analysis of the models according to the requirements of the scenario stakeholders.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Designing of Virtual Factory Information System by Enterprise Portal Empowering Business Users to Analyze Enterprise Architectures: Structural Model Matching to Configure Visualizations Moving towards "Relationship-Aware" Applications and Services: A Social Machine-Oriented Approach Service Innovation and Service Realisation with VDML and ServiceML IT Compliance Management Process Modeling Based on Best Practices Reference Models and Qualitative Data
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1