论国家的实用性:为什么我必须有一个国家?

Ž. Bošković
{"title":"论国家的实用性:为什么我必须有一个国家?","authors":"Ž. Bošković","doi":"10.5771/9783748923770-77","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There are many well-articulated reasons to favor a stateless society. Chomsky de‐ parts from many anarchists in believing that such a society is more likely to be achieved through a long, drawn out process that slowly erodes the machinery of the state rather than a single revolutionary moment. As a result, as Chomsky has empha‐ sized in many places,1 in the current political situation a stateless society can only be considered a long term goal. In the short run, the goal should actually be to strength‐ en the state in certain respects, namely, in the contexts where it helps achieve a freer and more just society—clear examples of this are providing a check on the power of large corporations and what has become a derogatory term on the right, the “welfare state”—which includes such horrible things as recognizing the right of every child, including those born to poor parents, to have food and get health care.2 In a way, then, the state can be pragmatically used in the process of moving toward a more equitable stateless society. There is a conflict here between theory and what is prac‐ tical, which is reflected in the long run vs short run opposition—the latter boils down to practical reasons. The conflict is only apparent however. Chomsky’s politi‐ cal work is not an academic research exercise, in its heart is political (and economic, since the two are really inseparable) activism. There is pragmatism that comes with activism. This activism-motivated pragmatism is the reason why for Chomsky there is no contradiction, as there would be in a pure academic research exercise, between holding anarchist ideals, including stateless society, and using the state to achieve re‐ forms that will lead to a more just society that is closer to anarchist ideals. There is also a reflection of Chomsky as a scientist here—if you are a scientist, say a physi‐ cist, you will use whatever methods you can to enlighten the issues you are investi‐ gating.3 On a par with that, regarding his political work, Chomsky says:4","PeriodicalId":400828,"journal":{"name":"Chomsky on State and Democracy","volume":"142 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On the (Im)practicality of the State: Why do I have to have a Country?\",\"authors\":\"Ž. Bošković\",\"doi\":\"10.5771/9783748923770-77\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"There are many well-articulated reasons to favor a stateless society. Chomsky de‐ parts from many anarchists in believing that such a society is more likely to be achieved through a long, drawn out process that slowly erodes the machinery of the state rather than a single revolutionary moment. As a result, as Chomsky has empha‐ sized in many places,1 in the current political situation a stateless society can only be considered a long term goal. In the short run, the goal should actually be to strength‐ en the state in certain respects, namely, in the contexts where it helps achieve a freer and more just society—clear examples of this are providing a check on the power of large corporations and what has become a derogatory term on the right, the “welfare state”—which includes such horrible things as recognizing the right of every child, including those born to poor parents, to have food and get health care.2 In a way, then, the state can be pragmatically used in the process of moving toward a more equitable stateless society. There is a conflict here between theory and what is prac‐ tical, which is reflected in the long run vs short run opposition—the latter boils down to practical reasons. The conflict is only apparent however. Chomsky’s politi‐ cal work is not an academic research exercise, in its heart is political (and economic, since the two are really inseparable) activism. There is pragmatism that comes with activism. This activism-motivated pragmatism is the reason why for Chomsky there is no contradiction, as there would be in a pure academic research exercise, between holding anarchist ideals, including stateless society, and using the state to achieve re‐ forms that will lead to a more just society that is closer to anarchist ideals. There is also a reflection of Chomsky as a scientist here—if you are a scientist, say a physi‐ cist, you will use whatever methods you can to enlighten the issues you are investi‐ gating.3 On a par with that, regarding his political work, Chomsky says:4\",\"PeriodicalId\":400828,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chomsky on State and Democracy\",\"volume\":\"142 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chomsky on State and Democracy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5771/9783748923770-77\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chomsky on State and Democracy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5771/9783748923770-77","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

支持无国籍社会的理由有很多。乔姆斯基与许多无政府主义者不同,他认为这样一个社会更有可能通过一个漫长而漫长的过程来实现,这个过程会慢慢侵蚀国家机器,而不是一个单一的革命时刻。因此,正如乔姆斯基在许多地方强调的那样,在当前的政治形势下,一个无国籍的社会只能被视为一个长期目标。在短期内,目标应该是实力还是国家在某些方面,也就是说,在它有助于实现一个更自由的环境和更多的只是society-clear的例子提供了一个检查的力量大公司和已成为一个贬义词在右边,“福利国家”——包括等可怕的事情认识到每一个孩子的权利,包括那些贫穷的父母所生,有食物和健康care.2因此,在某种程度上,国家可以在走向一个更公平的无国家社会的过程中被务实地利用。在这里,理论与实践之间存在冲突,这反映在长期与短期的对立上——后者归结为实际原因。然而,这种冲突只是表面上的。乔姆斯基的政治工作不是学术研究,其核心是政治(和经济,因为这两者实际上是不可分割的)行动主义。务实主义伴随着行动主义。这种激进主义驱动的实用主义是乔姆斯基认为无政府主义理想(包括无国家社会)和利用国家实现改革(将导致一个更接近无政府主义理想的更公正的社会)之间不存在矛盾的原因,这在纯粹的学术研究实践中是存在的。这里也反映了乔姆斯基作为一个科学家的一面——如果你是一个科学家,比如说一个物理学家,你会使用任何你能使用的方法来启发你正在研究的问题同样,关于他的政治工作,乔姆斯基说
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
On the (Im)practicality of the State: Why do I have to have a Country?
There are many well-articulated reasons to favor a stateless society. Chomsky de‐ parts from many anarchists in believing that such a society is more likely to be achieved through a long, drawn out process that slowly erodes the machinery of the state rather than a single revolutionary moment. As a result, as Chomsky has empha‐ sized in many places,1 in the current political situation a stateless society can only be considered a long term goal. In the short run, the goal should actually be to strength‐ en the state in certain respects, namely, in the contexts where it helps achieve a freer and more just society—clear examples of this are providing a check on the power of large corporations and what has become a derogatory term on the right, the “welfare state”—which includes such horrible things as recognizing the right of every child, including those born to poor parents, to have food and get health care.2 In a way, then, the state can be pragmatically used in the process of moving toward a more equitable stateless society. There is a conflict here between theory and what is prac‐ tical, which is reflected in the long run vs short run opposition—the latter boils down to practical reasons. The conflict is only apparent however. Chomsky’s politi‐ cal work is not an academic research exercise, in its heart is political (and economic, since the two are really inseparable) activism. There is pragmatism that comes with activism. This activism-motivated pragmatism is the reason why for Chomsky there is no contradiction, as there would be in a pure academic research exercise, between holding anarchist ideals, including stateless society, and using the state to achieve re‐ forms that will lead to a more just society that is closer to anarchist ideals. There is also a reflection of Chomsky as a scientist here—if you are a scientist, say a physi‐ cist, you will use whatever methods you can to enlighten the issues you are investi‐ gating.3 On a par with that, regarding his political work, Chomsky says:4
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis On the (Im)practicality of the State: Why do I have to have a Country?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1