{"title":"寻找理想的无轴承主转子(BMR)设计","authors":"D. Schrage","doi":"10.4050/f-0077-2021-16735","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The Main Rotor Hub is the design centerpiece for helicopters and other forms of rotorcraft. It has been a very complex mechanical system design in the past, especially for fully articulated rotor systems. Two major efforts have been made to reduce this complexity. First, was the introduction of elastomeric bearings and dampers which have freed articulated rotor hubs from liquid lubrication and extreme mechanical complexity. This has made them economically feasible for designers and manufacturers of articulated helicopters, such as Boeing and Sikorsky in the U.S; Airbus and Leonardo in Europe; and MIL in Russia. However, the major progress in main rotor hubs has been the continuous movement \"and search\" toward the ideal hingeless and/or bearingless main rotor hubs. Designing the \"Ideal Bearingless Main Rotor (BMR)\" hub has been akin to seeking the \"holy grail.\" One outside critic of the progress made toward the \"Ideal BMR\" over the years has been Thomas A. Hanson, who was involved in early designs of the Lockheed hingeless and bearingless rotor hubs in the 1960s. Having tried to go on his own after Lockheed failed and abandoned their hingeless and baringless rotor hubs, e.g. the XH-51A and the AH-56A Cheyenne, Tom revisited the status of rotorcraft hub design in the 1990s. However, due to the \"not invented here\" syndrome no major helicopter/rotorcraft manufacturer picked up on his innovative solutions. Helicopter/rotorcraft design engineers, especially those addressing aeroelasticity and dynamics, are a very small element in industry and government engineering organizations. The author of this paper was one of these and has been involved in developing, assessing and evaluating helicopter/rotorcraft designs for almost 50 years, e.g. UTTAS, AAH, AH-1 IRB, CH-47D, MDX, OH-58D, and LHX/RAH-66, along with accident investigations. He has also been the Georgia Tech Rotorcraft Design Professor from 1984 to 2019, where he taught and evaluated student design teams. In addition, his D.Sc. research and dissertation thesis under Dr. David A. Peters in 1978 (Schrage, D.P., \"Effect of Structural Parameters on the Flap-Lag Forced response of a Rotor Blade in Forward Flight\") shed new light on the tradeoffs between rotor loads and stability by developing an eigenvalue and modal decomposition approach. This included the evaluation of the Boeing and Sikorsky UTTAS bearingless tail rotors. This paper will review this search for the Ideal BMR and identify the importance it will play in future BMR designs which will be Cyber Physical Vehicle Systems (CPVS) to meet and satisfy the safety and design requirements of these new complex electrical, mechanical and adaptive control systems.\n","PeriodicalId":273020,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Vertical Flight Society 77th Annual Forum","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Search for an Ideal Bearingless Main Rotor (BMR) Design \",\"authors\":\"D. Schrage\",\"doi\":\"10.4050/f-0077-2021-16735\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n The Main Rotor Hub is the design centerpiece for helicopters and other forms of rotorcraft. It has been a very complex mechanical system design in the past, especially for fully articulated rotor systems. Two major efforts have been made to reduce this complexity. First, was the introduction of elastomeric bearings and dampers which have freed articulated rotor hubs from liquid lubrication and extreme mechanical complexity. This has made them economically feasible for designers and manufacturers of articulated helicopters, such as Boeing and Sikorsky in the U.S; Airbus and Leonardo in Europe; and MIL in Russia. However, the major progress in main rotor hubs has been the continuous movement \\\"and search\\\" toward the ideal hingeless and/or bearingless main rotor hubs. Designing the \\\"Ideal Bearingless Main Rotor (BMR)\\\" hub has been akin to seeking the \\\"holy grail.\\\" One outside critic of the progress made toward the \\\"Ideal BMR\\\" over the years has been Thomas A. Hanson, who was involved in early designs of the Lockheed hingeless and bearingless rotor hubs in the 1960s. Having tried to go on his own after Lockheed failed and abandoned their hingeless and baringless rotor hubs, e.g. the XH-51A and the AH-56A Cheyenne, Tom revisited the status of rotorcraft hub design in the 1990s. However, due to the \\\"not invented here\\\" syndrome no major helicopter/rotorcraft manufacturer picked up on his innovative solutions. Helicopter/rotorcraft design engineers, especially those addressing aeroelasticity and dynamics, are a very small element in industry and government engineering organizations. The author of this paper was one of these and has been involved in developing, assessing and evaluating helicopter/rotorcraft designs for almost 50 years, e.g. UTTAS, AAH, AH-1 IRB, CH-47D, MDX, OH-58D, and LHX/RAH-66, along with accident investigations. He has also been the Georgia Tech Rotorcraft Design Professor from 1984 to 2019, where he taught and evaluated student design teams. In addition, his D.Sc. research and dissertation thesis under Dr. David A. Peters in 1978 (Schrage, D.P., \\\"Effect of Structural Parameters on the Flap-Lag Forced response of a Rotor Blade in Forward Flight\\\") shed new light on the tradeoffs between rotor loads and stability by developing an eigenvalue and modal decomposition approach. This included the evaluation of the Boeing and Sikorsky UTTAS bearingless tail rotors. This paper will review this search for the Ideal BMR and identify the importance it will play in future BMR designs which will be Cyber Physical Vehicle Systems (CPVS) to meet and satisfy the safety and design requirements of these new complex electrical, mechanical and adaptive control systems.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":273020,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the Vertical Flight Society 77th Annual Forum\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the Vertical Flight Society 77th Annual Forum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4050/f-0077-2021-16735\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Vertical Flight Society 77th Annual Forum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4050/f-0077-2021-16735","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
主旋翼轮毂是直升机和其他形式旋翼飞行器的设计核心。在过去,它一直是一个非常复杂的机械系统设计,特别是对于全铰接转子系统。为了减少这种复杂性,已经做出了两项主要努力。首先,引入了弹性轴承和阻尼器,将铰接式转子轮毂从液体润滑和极端机械复杂性中解放出来。这使得铰接式直升机的设计师和制造商,如美国的波音和西科斯基,在经济上是可行的;欧洲的空客和莱昂纳多;俄罗斯的MIL。然而,主转子轮毂的主要进展是朝着理想的无铰链和/或无轴承主转子轮毂的不断运动和探索。设计“理想无轴承主转子(BMR)”轮毂类似于寻找“圣杯”。多年来,外界对“理想BMR”取得的进展持批评态度的是托马斯·a·汉森(Thomas A. Hanson),他在20世纪60年代参与了洛克希德公司无铰链和无轴承转子轮毂的早期设计。在洛克希德失败并放弃他们的无铰链和无铰链转子轮毂后,他试图自己去,例如XH-51A和AH-56A夏安,汤姆在20世纪90年代重新审视了旋翼机轮毂设计的现状。然而,由于“不是在这里发明的”综合症,没有主要的直升机/旋翼飞机制造商接受他的创新解决方案。直升机/旋翼机设计工程师,特别是那些研究气动弹性和动力学的工程师,在工业和政府工程组织中是一个非常小的元素。本文作者就是其中之一,近50年来一直参与开发、评估和评估直升机/旋翼机设计,如UTTAS、AAH、AH-1 IRB、CH-47D、MDX、OH-58D和LHX/RAH-66,以及事故调查。1984年至2019年,他还担任佐治亚理工学院旋翼飞机设计教授,在那里他教授和评估学生设计团队。此外,他的博士研究和1978年David a . Peters博士的论文(Schrage, d.p.,“结构参数对前飞中旋翼叶片的扑动滞后强迫响应的影响”)通过发展特征值和模态分解方法,为旋翼载荷和稳定性之间的权衡提供了新的视角。这包括对波音和西科斯基UTTAS无轴承尾桨的评估。本文将回顾对理想BMR的研究,并确定它在未来BMR设计中的重要性,这将是网络物理车辆系统(CPVS),以满足这些新的复杂电气,机械和自适应控制系统的安全和设计要求。
The Search for an Ideal Bearingless Main Rotor (BMR) Design
The Main Rotor Hub is the design centerpiece for helicopters and other forms of rotorcraft. It has been a very complex mechanical system design in the past, especially for fully articulated rotor systems. Two major efforts have been made to reduce this complexity. First, was the introduction of elastomeric bearings and dampers which have freed articulated rotor hubs from liquid lubrication and extreme mechanical complexity. This has made them economically feasible for designers and manufacturers of articulated helicopters, such as Boeing and Sikorsky in the U.S; Airbus and Leonardo in Europe; and MIL in Russia. However, the major progress in main rotor hubs has been the continuous movement "and search" toward the ideal hingeless and/or bearingless main rotor hubs. Designing the "Ideal Bearingless Main Rotor (BMR)" hub has been akin to seeking the "holy grail." One outside critic of the progress made toward the "Ideal BMR" over the years has been Thomas A. Hanson, who was involved in early designs of the Lockheed hingeless and bearingless rotor hubs in the 1960s. Having tried to go on his own after Lockheed failed and abandoned their hingeless and baringless rotor hubs, e.g. the XH-51A and the AH-56A Cheyenne, Tom revisited the status of rotorcraft hub design in the 1990s. However, due to the "not invented here" syndrome no major helicopter/rotorcraft manufacturer picked up on his innovative solutions. Helicopter/rotorcraft design engineers, especially those addressing aeroelasticity and dynamics, are a very small element in industry and government engineering organizations. The author of this paper was one of these and has been involved in developing, assessing and evaluating helicopter/rotorcraft designs for almost 50 years, e.g. UTTAS, AAH, AH-1 IRB, CH-47D, MDX, OH-58D, and LHX/RAH-66, along with accident investigations. He has also been the Georgia Tech Rotorcraft Design Professor from 1984 to 2019, where he taught and evaluated student design teams. In addition, his D.Sc. research and dissertation thesis under Dr. David A. Peters in 1978 (Schrage, D.P., "Effect of Structural Parameters on the Flap-Lag Forced response of a Rotor Blade in Forward Flight") shed new light on the tradeoffs between rotor loads and stability by developing an eigenvalue and modal decomposition approach. This included the evaluation of the Boeing and Sikorsky UTTAS bearingless tail rotors. This paper will review this search for the Ideal BMR and identify the importance it will play in future BMR designs which will be Cyber Physical Vehicle Systems (CPVS) to meet and satisfy the safety and design requirements of these new complex electrical, mechanical and adaptive control systems.