寻求合法索赔:北美自由贸易协定第11章的范围和东道国的责任限制

Charles-Emmanuel Côté
{"title":"寻求合法索赔:北美自由贸易协定第11章的范围和东道国的责任限制","authors":"Charles-Emmanuel Côté","doi":"10.1163/22119000-01203003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The lack of a political or legal filter for investor claims makes it necessary for host States to look at new means to dismiss frivolous or illegitimate claims. No solution to this problem is readily offered by the law of treaties or the law of State responsibility. Nevertheless, public international law does frame the discussion on the limitation of host State responsibility. Attempts have been made to use the provisions on the field of application of North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) to achieve this objective. First attempt was made to consider NAFTA chapters on investment and other issues as mutually exclusive. A second attempt, by using the concept of 'measures relating to foreign investors or their investments' in NAFTA Article 1110, has been more successful. The chapter examines these overlooked attempts to use provisions on the scope of treaties in the quest for legitimate claims in international investment law. Keywords:Host State; international investment law; North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA)","PeriodicalId":163787,"journal":{"name":"The journal of world investment and trade","volume":"54 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Looking for Legitimate Claims: Scope of Nafta Chapter 11 and Limitation of Responsibility of Host State\",\"authors\":\"Charles-Emmanuel Côté\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/22119000-01203003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The lack of a political or legal filter for investor claims makes it necessary for host States to look at new means to dismiss frivolous or illegitimate claims. No solution to this problem is readily offered by the law of treaties or the law of State responsibility. Nevertheless, public international law does frame the discussion on the limitation of host State responsibility. Attempts have been made to use the provisions on the field of application of North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) to achieve this objective. First attempt was made to consider NAFTA chapters on investment and other issues as mutually exclusive. A second attempt, by using the concept of 'measures relating to foreign investors or their investments' in NAFTA Article 1110, has been more successful. The chapter examines these overlooked attempts to use provisions on the scope of treaties in the quest for legitimate claims in international investment law. Keywords:Host State; international investment law; North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA)\",\"PeriodicalId\":163787,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The journal of world investment and trade\",\"volume\":\"54 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-10-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The journal of world investment and trade\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/22119000-01203003\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of world investment and trade","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/22119000-01203003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

由于缺乏对投资者索赔的政治或法律过滤,东道国有必要寻找新的手段来驳回无聊或非法的索赔。条约法或国家责任法不容易提供解决这个问题的办法。然而,国际公法确实构成了关于限制东道国责任的讨论的框架。人们试图利用关于北美自由贸易协定(北美自由贸易协定)适用领域的规定来实现这一目标。第一次尝试是将北美自由贸易协定关于投资和其他问题的章节视为相互排斥的。第二次尝试,即利用北美自由贸易协定第1110条中“与外国投资者或其投资有关的措施”的概念,取得了更大的成功。本章审查了这些被忽视的企图,即利用关于条约范围的规定来寻求国际投资法中的合法权利要求。关键词:主机状态;国际投资法;北美自由贸易协定(NAFTA)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Looking for Legitimate Claims: Scope of Nafta Chapter 11 and Limitation of Responsibility of Host State
The lack of a political or legal filter for investor claims makes it necessary for host States to look at new means to dismiss frivolous or illegitimate claims. No solution to this problem is readily offered by the law of treaties or the law of State responsibility. Nevertheless, public international law does frame the discussion on the limitation of host State responsibility. Attempts have been made to use the provisions on the field of application of North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) to achieve this objective. First attempt was made to consider NAFTA chapters on investment and other issues as mutually exclusive. A second attempt, by using the concept of 'measures relating to foreign investors or their investments' in NAFTA Article 1110, has been more successful. The chapter examines these overlooked attempts to use provisions on the scope of treaties in the quest for legitimate claims in international investment law. Keywords:Host State; international investment law; North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA)
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Quantum (In)Justice: Rethinking the Calculation of Compensation and Damages in ISDS The Mexican Front-of-Pack Labeling Reform: Is It Compatible with International Trade Law? Eiser v Spain – Unprecedented Annulment of an ICSID Award for Improper Constitution of the Tribunal Procedural Issues in International Investment Arbitration, written by Jeffery Commission and Rahim Moloo The Judicialisation of the Social License to Operate: Criteria for International Investment Law
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1