Gleneesha M. Johnson Williams, B. Walker, Angela Hennessy
{"title":"资源受限节点上DTN束协议实现的性能比较","authors":"Gleneesha M. Johnson Williams, B. Walker, Angela Hennessy","doi":"10.1145/2348616.2348634","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As delay-tolerant networking (DTN) finds applications in a wider variety of environments, DTN implementations have been ported to a variety of devices. Performance testing of DTN implementations has typically been carried out on powerful hardware, but there have been few performance evaluations on resource-constrained devices. We present the results of experiments comparing two of the major open-source DTN implementations, DTN2 and IBR-DTN, on resource-constrained nodes. The comparison is in terms of storage and receive performance, as well as network throughput.","PeriodicalId":211112,"journal":{"name":"CHANTS '12","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A performance comparison of DTN bundle protocol implementations on resource constrained nodes\",\"authors\":\"Gleneesha M. Johnson Williams, B. Walker, Angela Hennessy\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/2348616.2348634\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"As delay-tolerant networking (DTN) finds applications in a wider variety of environments, DTN implementations have been ported to a variety of devices. Performance testing of DTN implementations has typically been carried out on powerful hardware, but there have been few performance evaluations on resource-constrained devices. We present the results of experiments comparing two of the major open-source DTN implementations, DTN2 and IBR-DTN, on resource-constrained nodes. The comparison is in terms of storage and receive performance, as well as network throughput.\",\"PeriodicalId\":211112,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CHANTS '12\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-08-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CHANTS '12\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/2348616.2348634\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CHANTS '12","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2348616.2348634","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
A performance comparison of DTN bundle protocol implementations on resource constrained nodes
As delay-tolerant networking (DTN) finds applications in a wider variety of environments, DTN implementations have been ported to a variety of devices. Performance testing of DTN implementations has typically been carried out on powerful hardware, but there have been few performance evaluations on resource-constrained devices. We present the results of experiments comparing two of the major open-source DTN implementations, DTN2 and IBR-DTN, on resource-constrained nodes. The comparison is in terms of storage and receive performance, as well as network throughput.