giamico的新柏拉图式超形而上学是达马西奥的一项原则之上不可言喻的先兆

Tiziano F. Ottobrini
{"title":"giamico的新柏拉图式超形而上学是达马西奥的一项原则之上不可言喻的先兆","authors":"Tiziano F. Ottobrini","doi":"10.30687/lexis/2724-1564/2021/02/008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The essay aims at pointing out the origins of Damascius’ ineffable principle. In Damascius’ De principiis the first principle is totally unknowable, since it is beyond One; this radical thesis is not similar to the speculation from Proclus to Plotinus but it has a close relationship only to Iamblichus, more than two centuries before Damascius. It will be argued that placing a principle beyond One was risky, because it rejects the henologic paradigm, traditional in the Neoplatonic system. Therefore Iamblichus did not fully develop his proposal and was resumed only by Damascus in his theoretical radicalism. As a result the passages in which Iamblichus spoke of an ineffable principle superior to One are preserved only by Damascius and are almost unknown to all the authors in the middle.","PeriodicalId":273833,"journal":{"name":"Num. 39 (n.s.) – Dicembre 2021 – Fasc. 2","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ipermetafisica neoplatonica\\n Giamblico come precursore dell'ineffabile principio al di sopra dell’uno del De principiis di Damascio\",\"authors\":\"Tiziano F. Ottobrini\",\"doi\":\"10.30687/lexis/2724-1564/2021/02/008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The essay aims at pointing out the origins of Damascius’ ineffable principle. In Damascius’ De principiis the first principle is totally unknowable, since it is beyond One; this radical thesis is not similar to the speculation from Proclus to Plotinus but it has a close relationship only to Iamblichus, more than two centuries before Damascius. It will be argued that placing a principle beyond One was risky, because it rejects the henologic paradigm, traditional in the Neoplatonic system. Therefore Iamblichus did not fully develop his proposal and was resumed only by Damascus in his theoretical radicalism. As a result the passages in which Iamblichus spoke of an ineffable principle superior to One are preserved only by Damascius and are almost unknown to all the authors in the middle.\",\"PeriodicalId\":273833,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Num. 39 (n.s.) – Dicembre 2021 – Fasc. 2\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Num. 39 (n.s.) – Dicembre 2021 – Fasc. 2\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30687/lexis/2724-1564/2021/02/008\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Num. 39 (n.s.) – Dicembre 2021 – Fasc. 2","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30687/lexis/2724-1564/2021/02/008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文旨在指出大马士革不可言说原则的起源。在大马士革的《论原则》中,第一原则是完全不可知的,因为它是超越一的;这个激进的论点与普罗克劳斯和普罗提诺之间的推测不同,但它只与比大马士革早两个多世纪的伊姆布利库斯有密切的关系。有人会说,把一个原则置于“一”之上是有风险的,因为它拒绝了新柏拉图主义体系中传统的henological范式。因此,伊姆布利库斯并没有完全发展他的建议,只有大马士革在他的理论激进主义中才得以恢复。结果,在伊姆布利库斯谈到一个不可言喻的原则优于一个只有大马士革保存的段落,几乎不知道所有的作者在中间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Ipermetafisica neoplatonica Giamblico come precursore dell'ineffabile principio al di sopra dell’uno del De principiis di Damascio
The essay aims at pointing out the origins of Damascius’ ineffable principle. In Damascius’ De principiis the first principle is totally unknowable, since it is beyond One; this radical thesis is not similar to the speculation from Proclus to Plotinus but it has a close relationship only to Iamblichus, more than two centuries before Damascius. It will be argued that placing a principle beyond One was risky, because it rejects the henologic paradigm, traditional in the Neoplatonic system. Therefore Iamblichus did not fully develop his proposal and was resumed only by Damascus in his theoretical radicalism. As a result the passages in which Iamblichus spoke of an ineffable principle superior to One are preserved only by Damascius and are almost unknown to all the authors in the middle.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Ipermetafisica neoplatonica Giamblico come precursore dell'ineffabile principio al di sopra dell’uno del De principiis di Damascio Anton Bierl (Hrsg.), Sappho, Lieder Herausgegeben und übersetzt sowie mit Anmerkungen und Nachwort versehen von Anton Bierl Livy’s Cato and Commodities at Centre and Periphery La lingua tra medicina, linguistica e retorica in Galeno Drawing Imperial Lines: Sovereignty and Tacitus’ Germanicus
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1