{"title":"埃德加·胡佛的四个袋子:修辞功能分析","authors":"D. Gibson","doi":"10.1080/10417949409372948","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This essay uses declassified FBI internal memoranda to study J. Edgar Hoover's rhetorical behavior. Specifically, it is possible to understand better the administrative and communicative tendencies of the Director through analysis of his hand‐written comments. The unvarnished, completely candid Hoover emerges from these “fourbaggers. “Hoover's scrawled messages fulfilled twelve basic functions: 1) demands for expedited action, 2) administrative orders, 3) approval of proposed FBI policies, 4) complaining, 5) “no comment” orders, 6) FBI policy proposals, 7) criticism of FBI errors, 8) disapproval of FBI policy proposals, 9) information requests, 10) complaints about criticism, 11) self‐protection, and 12) attacks on critics. Careful analysis of these rhetorical functions reveals four clusters, or groups of functions. These are: 1) self‐protection, 2) retaliation, 3) emotional catharsis, and 4) orders and requests. While these categories are not entirely discrete, and although we cannot precisely understand...","PeriodicalId":212800,"journal":{"name":"Southern Journal of Communication","volume":"194 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"J. Edgar Hoover's four‐baggers: An analysis of rhetorical functions\",\"authors\":\"D. Gibson\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10417949409372948\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This essay uses declassified FBI internal memoranda to study J. Edgar Hoover's rhetorical behavior. Specifically, it is possible to understand better the administrative and communicative tendencies of the Director through analysis of his hand‐written comments. The unvarnished, completely candid Hoover emerges from these “fourbaggers. “Hoover's scrawled messages fulfilled twelve basic functions: 1) demands for expedited action, 2) administrative orders, 3) approval of proposed FBI policies, 4) complaining, 5) “no comment” orders, 6) FBI policy proposals, 7) criticism of FBI errors, 8) disapproval of FBI policy proposals, 9) information requests, 10) complaints about criticism, 11) self‐protection, and 12) attacks on critics. Careful analysis of these rhetorical functions reveals four clusters, or groups of functions. These are: 1) self‐protection, 2) retaliation, 3) emotional catharsis, and 4) orders and requests. While these categories are not entirely discrete, and although we cannot precisely understand...\",\"PeriodicalId\":212800,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Southern Journal of Communication\",\"volume\":\"194 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1994-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Southern Journal of Communication\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10417949409372948\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Southern Journal of Communication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10417949409372948","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
J. Edgar Hoover's four‐baggers: An analysis of rhetorical functions
This essay uses declassified FBI internal memoranda to study J. Edgar Hoover's rhetorical behavior. Specifically, it is possible to understand better the administrative and communicative tendencies of the Director through analysis of his hand‐written comments. The unvarnished, completely candid Hoover emerges from these “fourbaggers. “Hoover's scrawled messages fulfilled twelve basic functions: 1) demands for expedited action, 2) administrative orders, 3) approval of proposed FBI policies, 4) complaining, 5) “no comment” orders, 6) FBI policy proposals, 7) criticism of FBI errors, 8) disapproval of FBI policy proposals, 9) information requests, 10) complaints about criticism, 11) self‐protection, and 12) attacks on critics. Careful analysis of these rhetorical functions reveals four clusters, or groups of functions. These are: 1) self‐protection, 2) retaliation, 3) emotional catharsis, and 4) orders and requests. While these categories are not entirely discrete, and although we cannot precisely understand...