全身麻醉下上肢骨科术后静脉注射硫酸镁镇痛的比较研究

S. Kaur, Naresh Baghla
{"title":"全身麻醉下上肢骨科术后静脉注射硫酸镁镇痛的比较研究","authors":"S. Kaur, Naresh Baghla","doi":"10.5580/2ac9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BackgroundThis randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind study designed to assess the efficacy of intravenous magnesium sulphate to reduce postoperative pain in upper limb orthopaedic surgery (duration of surgery≤120minutes) under general anaesthesia using thiopentone, fentanyl, vecuronium,N2O/O2 and isoflurane.MethodAfter obtaining written informed consent from 100 ASA I-II patients, they were divided randomly into two groups of 50 each. Group M received magnesium sulphate 30 mg/kg as a bolus before induction and 10 mg/kg/hour by infusion. Group S patients received same volume of normal saline. All the vital parameters were recorded at the time of start of administering drugs and at 10 minutes interval till the end of study. All patients received injection meperidine 0.5-1mg/kg intramuscular (IM) and diclofenac 75 mg IM as soon as they complained of pain or when the visual analogue scale (VAS) became >3cm. Pain by using VAS, during first hour and 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 hours after surgery was noted. The timing and dosage of rescue analgesic during first 24hrs after operation was noted.ResultPain in the postoperative period was significantly lower in group M compared to in group S during first hour and 3,6,12 and 18 hrs postoperatively. Patients in group M were more sedated as compared to group S [sedation score 1.32 vs. 1.88 (p=0.000)]. Rescue analgesia requirement postoperatively was significantly lower in patients of group M than group S.ConclusionIntravenous Magnesium sulphate decreases postoperative pain and cumulative analgesic requirement without any clinically significant adverse reaction.","PeriodicalId":396781,"journal":{"name":"The Internet Journal of Anesthesiology","volume":"66 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation Of Intravenous Magnesium Sulphate For Postoperative Analgesia In Upper Limb Orthopaedic Surgery Under General Anaesthesia: A Comparative Study\",\"authors\":\"S. Kaur, Naresh Baghla\",\"doi\":\"10.5580/2ac9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BackgroundThis randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind study designed to assess the efficacy of intravenous magnesium sulphate to reduce postoperative pain in upper limb orthopaedic surgery (duration of surgery≤120minutes) under general anaesthesia using thiopentone, fentanyl, vecuronium,N2O/O2 and isoflurane.MethodAfter obtaining written informed consent from 100 ASA I-II patients, they were divided randomly into two groups of 50 each. Group M received magnesium sulphate 30 mg/kg as a bolus before induction and 10 mg/kg/hour by infusion. Group S patients received same volume of normal saline. All the vital parameters were recorded at the time of start of administering drugs and at 10 minutes interval till the end of study. All patients received injection meperidine 0.5-1mg/kg intramuscular (IM) and diclofenac 75 mg IM as soon as they complained of pain or when the visual analogue scale (VAS) became >3cm. Pain by using VAS, during first hour and 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 hours after surgery was noted. The timing and dosage of rescue analgesic during first 24hrs after operation was noted.ResultPain in the postoperative period was significantly lower in group M compared to in group S during first hour and 3,6,12 and 18 hrs postoperatively. Patients in group M were more sedated as compared to group S [sedation score 1.32 vs. 1.88 (p=0.000)]. Rescue analgesia requirement postoperatively was significantly lower in patients of group M than group S.ConclusionIntravenous Magnesium sulphate decreases postoperative pain and cumulative analgesic requirement without any clinically significant adverse reaction.\",\"PeriodicalId\":396781,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Internet Journal of Anesthesiology\",\"volume\":\"66 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-01-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Internet Journal of Anesthesiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5580/2ac9\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Internet Journal of Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5580/2ac9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

本研究是一项随机、安慰剂对照、双盲研究,旨在评估在使用硫贲妥酮、芬太尼、维库溴铵、N2O/O2和异氟醚全麻的情况下,静脉注射硫酸镁减轻上肢矫形手术(手术时间≤120分钟)术后疼痛的疗效。方法100例ASA I-II期患者在获得书面知情同意后,随机分为两组,每组50例。M组诱导前给药硫酸镁30 mg/kg,诱导后给药10 mg/kg/h。S组患者给予等量生理盐水。在给药开始时和每隔10分钟至研究结束时记录所有重要参数。所有患者均在出现疼痛症状或视觉模拟评分(VAS) >3cm时立即给予肌内注射哌哌啶0.5 ~ 1mg/kg,双氯芬酸75mg。通过VAS记录术后1小时及3、6、12、18、24小时的疼痛情况。记录术后24h抢救镇痛的时间和剂量。结果M组术后1 h及术后3、6、12、18 h疼痛均明显低于S组。M组患者镇静程度高于S组[镇静评分1.32比1.88 (p=0.000)]。M组患者术后抢救镇痛需求明显低于s组。结论静脉注射硫酸镁可减轻术后疼痛和累积镇痛需求,无明显临床不良反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluation Of Intravenous Magnesium Sulphate For Postoperative Analgesia In Upper Limb Orthopaedic Surgery Under General Anaesthesia: A Comparative Study
BackgroundThis randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind study designed to assess the efficacy of intravenous magnesium sulphate to reduce postoperative pain in upper limb orthopaedic surgery (duration of surgery≤120minutes) under general anaesthesia using thiopentone, fentanyl, vecuronium,N2O/O2 and isoflurane.MethodAfter obtaining written informed consent from 100 ASA I-II patients, they were divided randomly into two groups of 50 each. Group M received magnesium sulphate 30 mg/kg as a bolus before induction and 10 mg/kg/hour by infusion. Group S patients received same volume of normal saline. All the vital parameters were recorded at the time of start of administering drugs and at 10 minutes interval till the end of study. All patients received injection meperidine 0.5-1mg/kg intramuscular (IM) and diclofenac 75 mg IM as soon as they complained of pain or when the visual analogue scale (VAS) became >3cm. Pain by using VAS, during first hour and 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 hours after surgery was noted. The timing and dosage of rescue analgesic during first 24hrs after operation was noted.ResultPain in the postoperative period was significantly lower in group M compared to in group S during first hour and 3,6,12 and 18 hrs postoperatively. Patients in group M were more sedated as compared to group S [sedation score 1.32 vs. 1.88 (p=0.000)]. Rescue analgesia requirement postoperatively was significantly lower in patients of group M than group S.ConclusionIntravenous Magnesium sulphate decreases postoperative pain and cumulative analgesic requirement without any clinically significant adverse reaction.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Inferior Alveolar Nerve Injury With Laryngeal Mask Airway Unusual Oral Cavity Metastasis From Follicular Carcinoma Of The Thyroid – A Case Report Efficacy of Ephedrine Versus Lignocaine Pretreatment In Preventing Pain Following Propofol Injection: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study. Cesarean Section of a 25 3/7 Week Parturient with Fibrodysplasia Ossificans Progressiva: A Case Report Magill Forceps- An Aid For Difficult Intubation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1