{"title":"刑事诉讼中反积累条款在公法责任中的适用——基于最高人民法院第2号决议的评析。I KZP 15/16","authors":"Milena Garwol","doi":"10.16926/gea.2021.02.28","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article mentions the issue of an application of the anti-accumulation clause in criminal procedure to public-law liabilities. The author’s view is critical to the argumentation presented by the Supreme Court. The assumption made in this resolution can lead to double punishment for the same behaviour and does not distinguish the situation between perpetrators, depending on the character of commited injury not the forbidden act. The statement presented in the sentence also raises doubts form the civil law perspective and does not see the position of the victim.","PeriodicalId":166701,"journal":{"name":"Gubernaculum et Administratio","volume":"69 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The application of the anti-accumulation clause in criminal procedure to public – law liabilities – some remarks based on the resolution of Supreme Court no. I KZP 15/16\",\"authors\":\"Milena Garwol\",\"doi\":\"10.16926/gea.2021.02.28\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article mentions the issue of an application of the anti-accumulation clause in criminal procedure to public-law liabilities. The author’s view is critical to the argumentation presented by the Supreme Court. The assumption made in this resolution can lead to double punishment for the same behaviour and does not distinguish the situation between perpetrators, depending on the character of commited injury not the forbidden act. The statement presented in the sentence also raises doubts form the civil law perspective and does not see the position of the victim.\",\"PeriodicalId\":166701,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gubernaculum et Administratio\",\"volume\":\"69 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gubernaculum et Administratio\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.16926/gea.2021.02.28\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gubernaculum et Administratio","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.16926/gea.2021.02.28","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
The application of the anti-accumulation clause in criminal procedure to public – law liabilities – some remarks based on the resolution of Supreme Court no. I KZP 15/16
This article mentions the issue of an application of the anti-accumulation clause in criminal procedure to public-law liabilities. The author’s view is critical to the argumentation presented by the Supreme Court. The assumption made in this resolution can lead to double punishment for the same behaviour and does not distinguish the situation between perpetrators, depending on the character of commited injury not the forbidden act. The statement presented in the sentence also raises doubts form the civil law perspective and does not see the position of the victim.