Al-Hijama(拔火罐)与常规药物治疗鼻窦炎的安全性和有效性比较(II):常规药物治疗鼻窦炎

E. Ghazy, S. M. Muhayawi, Samiha A. Mourad
{"title":"Al-Hijama(拔火罐)与常规药物治疗鼻窦炎的安全性和有效性比较(II):常规药物治疗鼻窦炎","authors":"E. Ghazy, S. M. Muhayawi, Samiha A. Mourad","doi":"10.4197/MED.27-1.7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Sinusitis has severe negative effects on the quality of life and on work productivity. Cupping (Al-Hijama in Arabic) is a historical, yet a successful, method of treatment for many health problems, and it is now an international evidence-based medical treatment. This study compared the effectiveness and the safety of the cupping therapy as an adjuvant or alternative to pharmacological therapy, based on clinical examinations and their corresponding laboratory results. A randomized and controlled clinical trial was conducted in the Prophetic Medicine Research Cupping Clinic of the King Abdulaziz University Hospital in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, by recruiting 60 patients, who were suffering from chronic or recurrent acute sinusitis. The patients were divided into three groups: 1) those who had undergone Al-Hijama with drug therapy; 2) those who had Al-Hijama plus a salt nasal solution and an analgesic, when needed; and 3) those who were regularly treated with ordinary medicine. The groups were re-examined after three months of treatment. The results showed significant differences on the effects of cupping, based on the results of the clinical and the laboratory analyses (Eosinophil). Al-Hijama therapy was found to be effective, simple, affordable, acceptable, and safe, when used correctly.","PeriodicalId":287732,"journal":{"name":"Journal of King Abdulaziz University-medical Sciences","volume":"46 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison between the Safety and Effectiveness of Al-Hijama (Cupping) and the Conventional Medical Therapy as Treatment for Sinusitis (II): Conventional Medical Therapy for Sinusitis\",\"authors\":\"E. Ghazy, S. M. Muhayawi, Samiha A. Mourad\",\"doi\":\"10.4197/MED.27-1.7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Sinusitis has severe negative effects on the quality of life and on work productivity. Cupping (Al-Hijama in Arabic) is a historical, yet a successful, method of treatment for many health problems, and it is now an international evidence-based medical treatment. This study compared the effectiveness and the safety of the cupping therapy as an adjuvant or alternative to pharmacological therapy, based on clinical examinations and their corresponding laboratory results. A randomized and controlled clinical trial was conducted in the Prophetic Medicine Research Cupping Clinic of the King Abdulaziz University Hospital in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, by recruiting 60 patients, who were suffering from chronic or recurrent acute sinusitis. The patients were divided into three groups: 1) those who had undergone Al-Hijama with drug therapy; 2) those who had Al-Hijama plus a salt nasal solution and an analgesic, when needed; and 3) those who were regularly treated with ordinary medicine. The groups were re-examined after three months of treatment. The results showed significant differences on the effects of cupping, based on the results of the clinical and the laboratory analyses (Eosinophil). Al-Hijama therapy was found to be effective, simple, affordable, acceptable, and safe, when used correctly.\",\"PeriodicalId\":287732,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of King Abdulaziz University-medical Sciences\",\"volume\":\"46 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of King Abdulaziz University-medical Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4197/MED.27-1.7\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of King Abdulaziz University-medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4197/MED.27-1.7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

鼻窦炎对生活质量和工作效率有严重的负面影响。拔火罐(阿拉伯语Al-Hijama)是治疗许多健康问题的历史方法,但也是一种成功的方法,现在是一种国际循证医学治疗。本研究根据临床检查和相应的实验室结果,比较了火罐治疗作为药物治疗的辅助或替代的有效性和安全性。在沙特阿拉伯吉达阿卜杜勒阿齐兹国王大学医院先知医学研究拔罐诊所进行随机对照临床试验,招募60例慢性或复发性急性鼻窦炎患者。患者分为三组:1)经Al-Hijama治疗的患者;2)在需要时服用Al-Hijama加盐鼻溶液和止痛药的人;3)那些经常用普通药物治疗的人。治疗三个月后,对各组进行重新检查。结果显示,根据临床和实验室分析(嗜酸性粒细胞)的结果,拔罐的效果有显著差异。人们发现,Al-Hijama疗法在正确使用时是有效、简单、负担得起、可接受和安全的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison between the Safety and Effectiveness of Al-Hijama (Cupping) and the Conventional Medical Therapy as Treatment for Sinusitis (II): Conventional Medical Therapy for Sinusitis
Sinusitis has severe negative effects on the quality of life and on work productivity. Cupping (Al-Hijama in Arabic) is a historical, yet a successful, method of treatment for many health problems, and it is now an international evidence-based medical treatment. This study compared the effectiveness and the safety of the cupping therapy as an adjuvant or alternative to pharmacological therapy, based on clinical examinations and their corresponding laboratory results. A randomized and controlled clinical trial was conducted in the Prophetic Medicine Research Cupping Clinic of the King Abdulaziz University Hospital in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, by recruiting 60 patients, who were suffering from chronic or recurrent acute sinusitis. The patients were divided into three groups: 1) those who had undergone Al-Hijama with drug therapy; 2) those who had Al-Hijama plus a salt nasal solution and an analgesic, when needed; and 3) those who were regularly treated with ordinary medicine. The groups were re-examined after three months of treatment. The results showed significant differences on the effects of cupping, based on the results of the clinical and the laboratory analyses (Eosinophil). Al-Hijama therapy was found to be effective, simple, affordable, acceptable, and safe, when used correctly.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Radiotherapy-induced Acute Carotid Blowout Syndrome in Base of Tongue Cancer The Effect of Intravenous Contrast Agents on Renal Functions in Children and Adolescents in the King Abdulaziz University Hospital, Jeddah Fatigue Testing of a Titanium Tapered Rod versus Two Rods Connected by a Parallel Connector across the Cervicothoracic Junction: A Biomechanical Study Comparison between the Safety and Effectiveness of Al-Hijama (Cupping) and the Conventional Medical Therapy as Treatment for Sinusitis (II): Conventional Medical Therapy for Sinusitis Knowledge and Attitude of Female Teachers Towards Emergency Management of Traumatic Dental Injuries in Jeddah City: A Cross-Sectional Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1