《暴风雨》中的音乐意义

J. Muller, Samuel Pepys, J. Muller
{"title":"《暴风雨》中的音乐意义","authors":"J. Muller, Samuel Pepys, J. Muller","doi":"10.1163/9789004489028_014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"On 7 November 1667, the diarist Samuel Pepys “resolv’d [...] to go see ‘The Tempest’, an old play of Shakespeare’s” on the first day it was presented at the Dorset Garden Theatre, also known as “the Duke’s house”.1 In the same entry, Pepys adds a description of “a curious piece of musique in an echo of half sentences, the echo repeating the former half, while the man goes on to the latter, which is mighty pretty”. This remark both identifies the performance as the Davenant/Dryden adaptation of The Tempest by Shakespeare, and brings into focus two questions. First, can we really say that Pepys saw Shakespeare’s play, and, by extension, accept as Shakespeare criticism his additional remark: “The play no great wit, but yet good, above ordinary plays”? Second, we know that the Davenant/Dryden adaptation was not turned into Thomas Shadwell’s opera until March or April 1674.2 So whose music did Pepys hear in 1667? Not Robert Johnson’s. The songs which he composed for what was possibly the original performance of The Tempest (certainly during Shakespeare’s lifetime) did","PeriodicalId":147296,"journal":{"name":"Reclamations of Shakespeare","volume":"115 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Music as Meaning in The Tempest\",\"authors\":\"J. Muller, Samuel Pepys, J. Muller\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/9789004489028_014\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"On 7 November 1667, the diarist Samuel Pepys “resolv’d [...] to go see ‘The Tempest’, an old play of Shakespeare’s” on the first day it was presented at the Dorset Garden Theatre, also known as “the Duke’s house”.1 In the same entry, Pepys adds a description of “a curious piece of musique in an echo of half sentences, the echo repeating the former half, while the man goes on to the latter, which is mighty pretty”. This remark both identifies the performance as the Davenant/Dryden adaptation of The Tempest by Shakespeare, and brings into focus two questions. First, can we really say that Pepys saw Shakespeare’s play, and, by extension, accept as Shakespeare criticism his additional remark: “The play no great wit, but yet good, above ordinary plays”? Second, we know that the Davenant/Dryden adaptation was not turned into Thomas Shadwell’s opera until March or April 1674.2 So whose music did Pepys hear in 1667? Not Robert Johnson’s. The songs which he composed for what was possibly the original performance of The Tempest (certainly during Shakespeare’s lifetime) did\",\"PeriodicalId\":147296,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reclamations of Shakespeare\",\"volume\":\"115 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1994-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reclamations of Shakespeare\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004489028_014\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reclamations of Shakespeare","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004489028_014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

1667年11月7日,日记作家塞缪尔·佩皮斯“解决了……去看莎士比亚的老剧《暴风雨》,这是它在多塞特花园剧院(也被称为“公爵的房子”)上演的第一天在同一条目中,佩皮斯补充了这样的描述:“一段奇怪的音乐在半句的回声中,回声重复着前半句,而那个人继续讲后半句,这真是太美了。”这句话既指出了这场演出是达文南特/德莱顿对莎士比亚《暴风雨》的改编,也引出了两个问题。首先,我们真的能说佩皮斯看过莎士比亚的戏剧,并引证为莎翁对他的评论:“这部戏剧没有伟大的智慧,但仍然很好,高于普通戏剧”吗?第二,我们知道达文南特/德莱顿的改编版直到1674.2年3月或4月才被改编成托马斯·沙德威尔的歌剧,那么1667年佩皮斯听到的是谁的音乐呢?不是罗伯特·约翰逊的。他为《暴风雨》的原版(当然是在莎士比亚的有生之年)创作的歌曲做到了这一点
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Music as Meaning in The Tempest
On 7 November 1667, the diarist Samuel Pepys “resolv’d [...] to go see ‘The Tempest’, an old play of Shakespeare’s” on the first day it was presented at the Dorset Garden Theatre, also known as “the Duke’s house”.1 In the same entry, Pepys adds a description of “a curious piece of musique in an echo of half sentences, the echo repeating the former half, while the man goes on to the latter, which is mighty pretty”. This remark both identifies the performance as the Davenant/Dryden adaptation of The Tempest by Shakespeare, and brings into focus two questions. First, can we really say that Pepys saw Shakespeare’s play, and, by extension, accept as Shakespeare criticism his additional remark: “The play no great wit, but yet good, above ordinary plays”? Second, we know that the Davenant/Dryden adaptation was not turned into Thomas Shadwell’s opera until March or April 1674.2 So whose music did Pepys hear in 1667? Not Robert Johnson’s. The songs which he composed for what was possibly the original performance of The Tempest (certainly during Shakespeare’s lifetime) did
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Revolting against the Legend: Anti-Shakespearean Elements in Jules Laforgue’s Hamlet Sixth Form and Pressure: Why Teach Shakespeare at A-Level? Enchanting Metadrama: Shakespeare’s Use of the Boy Actor in As You Like It Every Word in Shakespeare Music as Meaning in The Tempest
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1