大学生内容阐述的认知策略与性质

IF 1.7 3区 心理学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Psicologia Educativa Pub Date : 2013-06-01 DOI:10.5093/ed2013a3
Montserrat Marugán, Luis Jorge Martín, Javier Catalina, José María Román
{"title":"大学生内容阐述的认知策略与性质","authors":"Montserrat Marugán,&nbsp;Luis Jorge Martín,&nbsp;Javier Catalina,&nbsp;José María Román","doi":"10.5093/ed2013a3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The use of learning strategies by university students, and particularly of cognitive elaboration strategies, is a very important differential factor to explain academic performance. The aim of this study is to identify whether there is a preferential use of such strategies that may vary as a function of the nature of the contents and other moderator variables. In this study, we carry out a theoretical review of the topic and analyze the differential use of information “elaboration strategies” by university students as a function of the nature of knowledge, year, and gender. The sample consists of 544 students (40% males, 60% females) who study Experimental Sciences, Technical Studies, and Social and Juridical Sciences. Their mean age is 22.5 years and they are registered in the intermediate or final grades. The results show a medium level in the use of cognitive elaboration strategies and noticeable differences as a function of the variables under study.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":45361,"journal":{"name":"Psicologia Educativa","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2013-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5093/ed2013a3","citationCount":"27","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Estrategias cognitivas de elaboración y naturaleza de los contenidos en estudiantes universitarios\",\"authors\":\"Montserrat Marugán,&nbsp;Luis Jorge Martín,&nbsp;Javier Catalina,&nbsp;José María Román\",\"doi\":\"10.5093/ed2013a3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The use of learning strategies by university students, and particularly of cognitive elaboration strategies, is a very important differential factor to explain academic performance. The aim of this study is to identify whether there is a preferential use of such strategies that may vary as a function of the nature of the contents and other moderator variables. In this study, we carry out a theoretical review of the topic and analyze the differential use of information “elaboration strategies” by university students as a function of the nature of knowledge, year, and gender. The sample consists of 544 students (40% males, 60% females) who study Experimental Sciences, Technical Studies, and Social and Juridical Sciences. Their mean age is 22.5 years and they are registered in the intermediate or final grades. The results show a medium level in the use of cognitive elaboration strategies and noticeable differences as a function of the variables under study.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45361,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psicologia Educativa\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5093/ed2013a3\",\"citationCount\":\"27\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psicologia Educativa\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1135755X13700034\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psicologia Educativa","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1135755X13700034","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 27

摘要

大学生对学习策略的使用,尤其是认知阐述策略的使用,是解释学习成绩的一个非常重要的差异因素。本研究的目的是确定是否有优先使用这些策略,这些策略可能随着内容的性质和其他调节变量的函数而变化。在本研究中,我们对该主题进行了理论回顾,并分析了大学生对信息“阐述策略”的差异使用作为知识性质、年份和性别的函数。样本包括544名学生(男性40%,女性60%),他们学习实验科学、技术研究和社会与法律科学。他们的平均年龄为22.5岁,登记在中级或高年级。结果显示,在认知阐述策略的使用中等水平和显著的差异作为一个函数所研究的变量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Estrategias cognitivas de elaboración y naturaleza de los contenidos en estudiantes universitarios

The use of learning strategies by university students, and particularly of cognitive elaboration strategies, is a very important differential factor to explain academic performance. The aim of this study is to identify whether there is a preferential use of such strategies that may vary as a function of the nature of the contents and other moderator variables. In this study, we carry out a theoretical review of the topic and analyze the differential use of information “elaboration strategies” by university students as a function of the nature of knowledge, year, and gender. The sample consists of 544 students (40% males, 60% females) who study Experimental Sciences, Technical Studies, and Social and Juridical Sciences. Their mean age is 22.5 years and they are registered in the intermediate or final grades. The results show a medium level in the use of cognitive elaboration strategies and noticeable differences as a function of the variables under study.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
29 weeks
期刊介绍: La Revista Psicología Educativa es una revista científico-profesional española, de carácter multidisciplinar, que promueve tanto la aportación teórica como la investigación experimental y profesional del psicólogo y profesiones afines en el ámbito educativo. Su objetivo es compartir temas de común interés en procesos cognitivos, afectivos y culturales en la adquisición de conocimiento, como en áreas de intervención e innovación educativa. Por ello invita a investigadores relacionados con el ámbito educativo (psicólogos, antropólogos, sociólogos, tecnólogos educativos, TCs) a educadores y orientadores en diversos ámbitos, a psicólogos educativos, a evaluadores, a técnicos de computación y tecnologías de la información aplicadas a la educación a enviar sus trabajos a esta revista. Psicología Educativa acepta manuscritos inéditos y originales de interés para los psicólogos y que sean una contribución al conocimiento correspondiente al ámbito de la Psicología de la Educación. Psicología Educativa publica principalmente en castellano, pero admite contribuciones originales en inglés. Revista Psicología Educativa publica principalmente en castellano, pero admite igualmente contribuciones originales en inglés. La revista admite originales libres y también puede solicitar trabajos específicos a autores relevantes. Los manuscritos originales recibidos en castellano o inglés serán sometidos al proceso de revisión externa por expertos, anónima por pares doble ciego (Peer Review). En función de las valoraciones de los expertos, el equipo directivo de la revista tomará la decisión sobre los artículos que podrán ser aceptados, rechazados o solicitadas modificaciones para la mejora de los mismos y la aceptación o rechazo definitivos. Los autores que envían su trabajo a la revista, nunca lo deben postular simultáneamente a otras publicaciones.
期刊最新文献
Academic Procrastination of Spanish Pre-service Teachers during the COVID-19 Pandemic The Relationship between Learning Potential in Preschool Children and their Cognitive Abilities The Role of Executive Functioning and Technological Anxiety (FOMO) in College Course Performance as Mediated by Technology Usage and Multitasking Habits. Cybergossip and cyberbullying during primary school years Estudio sobre la utilización de estrategias de automotivación en estudiantes universitarios
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1