目标识别网络的绝对效率

R. Murray, Devin Kehoe
{"title":"目标识别网络的绝对效率","authors":"R. Murray, Devin Kehoe","doi":"10.32470/ccn.2022.1156-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": Deep neural networks have made rapid advances in object recognition, but progress has mostly been made through experimentation, with little guidance from normative theories. Here we use ideal observer theory and associated methods to compare current network performance to theoretical limits on performance. We measure network performance and ideal observer performance on a modified ImageNet task, where model observers view samples from a limited number of object categories, in several levels of external white Gaussian noise. We find that although current networks achieve 90% performance or better on the standard ImageNet task, the ideal observer performs vastly better on the more limited task we consider here. The networks' \"calculation efficiency\", a measure of the extent to which they use all available information to perform a task, is on the order of 10 -5 , an exceedingly small value. We consider reasons why efficiency may be so low, and outline further uses of ideal obsevers and noise methods to understand network performance.","PeriodicalId":341186,"journal":{"name":"2022 Conference on Cognitive Computational Neuroscience","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficiency of object recognition networks on an absolute scale\",\"authors\":\"R. Murray, Devin Kehoe\",\"doi\":\"10.32470/ccn.2022.1156-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\": Deep neural networks have made rapid advances in object recognition, but progress has mostly been made through experimentation, with little guidance from normative theories. Here we use ideal observer theory and associated methods to compare current network performance to theoretical limits on performance. We measure network performance and ideal observer performance on a modified ImageNet task, where model observers view samples from a limited number of object categories, in several levels of external white Gaussian noise. We find that although current networks achieve 90% performance or better on the standard ImageNet task, the ideal observer performs vastly better on the more limited task we consider here. The networks' \\\"calculation efficiency\\\", a measure of the extent to which they use all available information to perform a task, is on the order of 10 -5 , an exceedingly small value. We consider reasons why efficiency may be so low, and outline further uses of ideal obsevers and noise methods to understand network performance.\",\"PeriodicalId\":341186,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2022 Conference on Cognitive Computational Neuroscience\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2022 Conference on Cognitive Computational Neuroscience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32470/ccn.2022.1156-0\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 Conference on Cognitive Computational Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32470/ccn.2022.1156-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

深度神经网络在物体识别方面取得了快速进展,但进展主要是通过实验取得的,很少有规范理论的指导。在这里,我们使用理想观测器理论和相关方法来比较当前网络性能和性能的理论限制。我们在改进的ImageNet任务上测量网络性能和理想观测器性能,其中模型观测器在几个级别的外部高斯白噪声中查看有限数量的对象类别的样本。我们发现,尽管目前的网络在标准ImageNet任务上的性能达到90%或更高,但理想的观测器在我们这里考虑的更有限的任务上的性能要好得多。这些网络的“计算效率”(衡量它们利用所有可用信息来完成一项任务的程度)在10 -5的数量级上,这是一个非常小的值。我们考虑了效率可能如此之低的原因,并概述了理想观察器和噪声方法的进一步使用,以了解网络性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Efficiency of object recognition networks on an absolute scale
: Deep neural networks have made rapid advances in object recognition, but progress has mostly been made through experimentation, with little guidance from normative theories. Here we use ideal observer theory and associated methods to compare current network performance to theoretical limits on performance. We measure network performance and ideal observer performance on a modified ImageNet task, where model observers view samples from a limited number of object categories, in several levels of external white Gaussian noise. We find that although current networks achieve 90% performance or better on the standard ImageNet task, the ideal observer performs vastly better on the more limited task we consider here. The networks' "calculation efficiency", a measure of the extent to which they use all available information to perform a task, is on the order of 10 -5 , an exceedingly small value. We consider reasons why efficiency may be so low, and outline further uses of ideal obsevers and noise methods to understand network performance.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Common Encoding Axes for Face Selectivity and Non-face Objects in Macaque Face Cells Latent dimensionality scales with the performance of deep learning models of visual cortex Manipulating and Measuring Variation in DNN Representations 20 and 40-Hz Flickering-Light Stimulation Induces Changes in Functional Connectivity of Memory-Related Areas Modeling pain in the brain with conditional variational autoencoder
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1