{"title":"为顺序验证记录合成历史","authors":"A. Mishchenko, R. Brayton","doi":"10.1109/FMCAD.2008.ECP.8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Performing synthesis and verification in isolation has two undesirable consequences: (1) verification runs the risk of becoming intractable, and (2) strong sequential optimizations are not applied because they are hard to verify. This paper proposes a format for recording synthesis information and a methodology for sequential equivalence checking using this feedback from synthesis. An implementation is described and experimentally compared against an efficient general-purpose sequential equivalence checker that does not use synthesis information. Experimental results confirm expected substantial savings in runtime and reliability of equivalence checking for large designs.","PeriodicalId":399042,"journal":{"name":"2008 Formal Methods in Computer-Aided Design","volume":"48 4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Recording Synthesis History for Sequential Verification\",\"authors\":\"A. Mishchenko, R. Brayton\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/FMCAD.2008.ECP.8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Performing synthesis and verification in isolation has two undesirable consequences: (1) verification runs the risk of becoming intractable, and (2) strong sequential optimizations are not applied because they are hard to verify. This paper proposes a format for recording synthesis information and a methodology for sequential equivalence checking using this feedback from synthesis. An implementation is described and experimentally compared against an efficient general-purpose sequential equivalence checker that does not use synthesis information. Experimental results confirm expected substantial savings in runtime and reliability of equivalence checking for large designs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":399042,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2008 Formal Methods in Computer-Aided Design\",\"volume\":\"48 4 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-11-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"14\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2008 Formal Methods in Computer-Aided Design\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/FMCAD.2008.ECP.8\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2008 Formal Methods in Computer-Aided Design","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/FMCAD.2008.ECP.8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Recording Synthesis History for Sequential Verification
Performing synthesis and verification in isolation has two undesirable consequences: (1) verification runs the risk of becoming intractable, and (2) strong sequential optimizations are not applied because they are hard to verify. This paper proposes a format for recording synthesis information and a methodology for sequential equivalence checking using this feedback from synthesis. An implementation is described and experimentally compared against an efficient general-purpose sequential equivalence checker that does not use synthesis information. Experimental results confirm expected substantial savings in runtime and reliability of equivalence checking for large designs.