为顺序验证记录合成历史

A. Mishchenko, R. Brayton
{"title":"为顺序验证记录合成历史","authors":"A. Mishchenko, R. Brayton","doi":"10.1109/FMCAD.2008.ECP.8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Performing synthesis and verification in isolation has two undesirable consequences: (1) verification runs the risk of becoming intractable, and (2) strong sequential optimizations are not applied because they are hard to verify. This paper proposes a format for recording synthesis information and a methodology for sequential equivalence checking using this feedback from synthesis. An implementation is described and experimentally compared against an efficient general-purpose sequential equivalence checker that does not use synthesis information. Experimental results confirm expected substantial savings in runtime and reliability of equivalence checking for large designs.","PeriodicalId":399042,"journal":{"name":"2008 Formal Methods in Computer-Aided Design","volume":"48 4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Recording Synthesis History for Sequential Verification\",\"authors\":\"A. Mishchenko, R. Brayton\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/FMCAD.2008.ECP.8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Performing synthesis and verification in isolation has two undesirable consequences: (1) verification runs the risk of becoming intractable, and (2) strong sequential optimizations are not applied because they are hard to verify. This paper proposes a format for recording synthesis information and a methodology for sequential equivalence checking using this feedback from synthesis. An implementation is described and experimentally compared against an efficient general-purpose sequential equivalence checker that does not use synthesis information. Experimental results confirm expected substantial savings in runtime and reliability of equivalence checking for large designs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":399042,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2008 Formal Methods in Computer-Aided Design\",\"volume\":\"48 4 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-11-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"14\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2008 Formal Methods in Computer-Aided Design\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/FMCAD.2008.ECP.8\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2008 Formal Methods in Computer-Aided Design","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/FMCAD.2008.ECP.8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

摘要

单独执行合成和验证有两个不良后果:(1)验证有变得难以处理的风险,(2)由于难以验证而没有应用强顺序优化。本文提出了一种记录合成信息的格式和一种利用合成反馈进行顺序等效性检查的方法。描述了一种实现,并与不使用合成信息的高效通用顺序等效检查器进行了实验比较。实验结果证实了对大型设计的等效性检查在运行时间和可靠性方面的预期节省。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Recording Synthesis History for Sequential Verification
Performing synthesis and verification in isolation has two undesirable consequences: (1) verification runs the risk of becoming intractable, and (2) strong sequential optimizations are not applied because they are hard to verify. This paper proposes a format for recording synthesis information and a methodology for sequential equivalence checking using this feedback from synthesis. An implementation is described and experimentally compared against an efficient general-purpose sequential equivalence checker that does not use synthesis information. Experimental results confirm expected substantial savings in runtime and reliability of equivalence checking for large designs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
BACH : Bounded ReAchability CHecker for Linear Hybrid Automata Invited Tutorial: Considerations in the Design and Verification of Microprocessors for Safety-Critical and Security-Critical Applications Trading-Off SAT Search and Variable Quantifications for Effective Unbounded Model Checking Augmenting a Regular Expression-Based Temporal Logic with Local Variables A Temporal Language for SystemC
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1