敏捷方法中的质量方面专题专题前言

Eduardo Miranda, J. Fernandes
{"title":"敏捷方法中的质量方面专题专题前言","authors":"Eduardo Miranda, J. Fernandes","doi":"10.1109/QUATIC.2016.027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There is no doubt that agile methods have become mainstream and with their increased use unanswered questions start to appear: How do we address cross-cutting concerns when software is developed vertically? Does value prioritization lead to increases in technical debt by promoting feature development over refactoring? Isn’t the reticence to write initial specifications on the premise of change an invitation to unnecessary change? As agile development matures answers, albeit partial, responses start to appear. The recurring themes in this year presentations are not whether agile is good or bad, better or worse,","PeriodicalId":157671,"journal":{"name":"2016 10th International Conference on the Quality of Information and Communications Technology (QUATIC)","volume":"56 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Foreword of the Thematic Track Quality Aspects in Agile Methods\",\"authors\":\"Eduardo Miranda, J. Fernandes\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/QUATIC.2016.027\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"There is no doubt that agile methods have become mainstream and with their increased use unanswered questions start to appear: How do we address cross-cutting concerns when software is developed vertically? Does value prioritization lead to increases in technical debt by promoting feature development over refactoring? Isn’t the reticence to write initial specifications on the premise of change an invitation to unnecessary change? As agile development matures answers, albeit partial, responses start to appear. The recurring themes in this year presentations are not whether agile is good or bad, better or worse,\",\"PeriodicalId\":157671,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2016 10th International Conference on the Quality of Information and Communications Technology (QUATIC)\",\"volume\":\"56 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2016 10th International Conference on the Quality of Information and Communications Technology (QUATIC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/QUATIC.2016.027\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 10th International Conference on the Quality of Information and Communications Technology (QUATIC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/QUATIC.2016.027","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

毫无疑问,敏捷方法已经成为主流,并且随着它们使用的增加,未解决的问题开始出现:当软件垂直开发时,我们如何处理横切关注点?价值优先级是否会通过促进特性开发而不是重构而导致技术债务的增加?不愿在变更的前提下编写初始规格说明,难道不是在邀请不必要的变更吗?随着敏捷开发答案的成熟(尽管是部分的),响应开始出现。今年演讲中反复出现的主题不是敏捷是好是坏,是更好还是更糟,
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Foreword of the Thematic Track Quality Aspects in Agile Methods
There is no doubt that agile methods have become mainstream and with their increased use unanswered questions start to appear: How do we address cross-cutting concerns when software is developed vertically? Does value prioritization lead to increases in technical debt by promoting feature development over refactoring? Isn’t the reticence to write initial specifications on the premise of change an invitation to unnecessary change? As agile development matures answers, albeit partial, responses start to appear. The recurring themes in this year presentations are not whether agile is good or bad, better or worse,
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Customizable Approach for the Automated Quality Assessment of Modelling Artifacts A Process Framework with Agile Practices for Implementation of Project Portfolio Management Process Towards a Model about Quality of Software Requirements Specification in Agile Projects Expressing Measurement Uncertainty in Software Models Adopting Logical Architectures within Agile Projects
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1