在源隔离设施内加强家政人员培训后,对基于洗涤剂的清洁、基于消毒剂的清洁和基于洗涤剂的清洁进行比较

S. S. Patel, D. Pevalin, R. Prosser, A. Couchman
{"title":"在源隔离设施内加强家政人员培训后,对基于洗涤剂的清洁、基于消毒剂的清洁和基于洗涤剂的清洁进行比较","authors":"S. S. Patel, D. Pevalin, R. Prosser, A. Couchman","doi":"10.1177/14690446070080030701","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Source isolation facilities should be adequately cleaned to minimise the risk of cross-infection via the environment and fomites. The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of cleaning with detergent, cleaning with detergent followed by sodium hypochlorite and cleaning with detergent after enhanced training for domestic staff within isolation facilities in a district general hospital in southern England. Frequent `hand touch' sites in two isolation rooms were sampled, using contact plates. A total of 567 plates were collected. Bacterial total viable counts (TVCs) and environmental meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) were used as surrogate markers to compare the efficacy of the cleaning methods. The results indicate that cleaning with water and detergent followed by sodium hypochlorite achieved significantly lower TVCs for most sampling sites, but only significantly lower environmental MRSA detections from a minority of sample sites. No one method of cleaning consistently eliminated MRSA from the environment. These results provide some preliminary evidence for the use of detergent and hypochlorite cleaning within source isolation facilities.","PeriodicalId":265443,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Infection Control","volume":"81 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of detergent-based cleaning, disinfectant-based cleaning, and detergent-based cleaning after enhanced domestic staff training within a source isolation facility\",\"authors\":\"S. S. Patel, D. Pevalin, R. Prosser, A. Couchman\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/14690446070080030701\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Source isolation facilities should be adequately cleaned to minimise the risk of cross-infection via the environment and fomites. The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of cleaning with detergent, cleaning with detergent followed by sodium hypochlorite and cleaning with detergent after enhanced training for domestic staff within isolation facilities in a district general hospital in southern England. Frequent `hand touch' sites in two isolation rooms were sampled, using contact plates. A total of 567 plates were collected. Bacterial total viable counts (TVCs) and environmental meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) were used as surrogate markers to compare the efficacy of the cleaning methods. The results indicate that cleaning with water and detergent followed by sodium hypochlorite achieved significantly lower TVCs for most sampling sites, but only significantly lower environmental MRSA detections from a minority of sample sites. No one method of cleaning consistently eliminated MRSA from the environment. These results provide some preliminary evidence for the use of detergent and hypochlorite cleaning within source isolation facilities.\",\"PeriodicalId\":265443,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Journal of Infection Control\",\"volume\":\"81 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2007-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Journal of Infection Control\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/14690446070080030701\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Infection Control","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14690446070080030701","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

源隔离设施应充分清洁,以尽量减少通过环境和污染物交叉感染的风险。本研究的目的是比较在英格兰南部一家地区综合医院的隔离设施内,用洗涤剂清洁、用洗涤剂清洁后再用次氯酸钠清洁和对家政人员进行强化培训后用洗涤剂清洁的有效性。使用接触板对两个隔离室中经常“手接触”的地点进行了抽样。共收集到567个盘子。以细菌总活菌计数(tvc)和环境耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)作为替代指标,比较两种清洁方法的效果。结果表明,用水和洗涤剂清洗后,次氯酸钠对大多数采样点的tvc显著降低,但仅对少数采样点的环境MRSA检测显著降低。没有一种清洁方法能始终如一地从环境中消除MRSA。这些结果为在污染源隔离设施内使用洗涤剂和次氯酸盐清洁提供了一些初步证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of detergent-based cleaning, disinfectant-based cleaning, and detergent-based cleaning after enhanced domestic staff training within a source isolation facility
Source isolation facilities should be adequately cleaned to minimise the risk of cross-infection via the environment and fomites. The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of cleaning with detergent, cleaning with detergent followed by sodium hypochlorite and cleaning with detergent after enhanced training for domestic staff within isolation facilities in a district general hospital in southern England. Frequent `hand touch' sites in two isolation rooms were sampled, using contact plates. A total of 567 plates were collected. Bacterial total viable counts (TVCs) and environmental meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) were used as surrogate markers to compare the efficacy of the cleaning methods. The results indicate that cleaning with water and detergent followed by sodium hypochlorite achieved significantly lower TVCs for most sampling sites, but only significantly lower environmental MRSA detections from a minority of sample sites. No one method of cleaning consistently eliminated MRSA from the environment. These results provide some preliminary evidence for the use of detergent and hypochlorite cleaning within source isolation facilities.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Integrated care pathway for Clostridium difficile helps patient management The First European Union Antibiotic Awareness Day: raising awareness to protect the future Single room isolation to prevent the transmission of infection: development of a patient journey tool to support safe practice Essential Steps to Safe, Clean Care: The process of managing change Determinants of appropriate antibiotic use in the community — a survey in Sydney and Hong Kong
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1