没有遗憾的多样化,但太少了

Zaeem Hussain, Hina A. Khan, M. Sharaf
{"title":"没有遗憾的多样化,但太少了","authors":"Zaeem Hussain, Hina A. Khan, M. Sharaf","doi":"10.1145/2795218.2795225","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Representative data provide users with a concise overview of their potentially large query results. Recently, diversity maximization has been adopted as one technique to generate representative data with high coverage and low redundancy. Orthogonally, regret minimization has emerged as another technique to generate representative data with high utility that satisfy the user's preference. In reality, however, users typically have some pre-specified preferences over some dimensions of the data, while expecting good coverage over the other dimensions. Motivated by that need, in this work we propose a novel scheme called ReDi, which aims to generate representative data that balance the tradeoff between regret minimization and diversity maximization. ReDi is based on a hybrid objective function that combines both regret and diversity. Additionally, it employs several algorithms that are designed to maximize that objective function. We perform extensive experimental evaluation to measure the tradeoff between the effectiveness and efficiency provided by the different ReDi algorithms.","PeriodicalId":211132,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on Exploratory Search in Databases and the Web","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diversifying with Few Regrets, But too Few to Mention\",\"authors\":\"Zaeem Hussain, Hina A. Khan, M. Sharaf\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/2795218.2795225\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Representative data provide users with a concise overview of their potentially large query results. Recently, diversity maximization has been adopted as one technique to generate representative data with high coverage and low redundancy. Orthogonally, regret minimization has emerged as another technique to generate representative data with high utility that satisfy the user's preference. In reality, however, users typically have some pre-specified preferences over some dimensions of the data, while expecting good coverage over the other dimensions. Motivated by that need, in this work we propose a novel scheme called ReDi, which aims to generate representative data that balance the tradeoff between regret minimization and diversity maximization. ReDi is based on a hybrid objective function that combines both regret and diversity. Additionally, it employs several algorithms that are designed to maximize that objective function. We perform extensive experimental evaluation to measure the tradeoff between the effectiveness and efficiency provided by the different ReDi algorithms.\",\"PeriodicalId\":211132,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on Exploratory Search in Databases and the Web\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-05-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on Exploratory Search in Databases and the Web\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/2795218.2795225\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on Exploratory Search in Databases and the Web","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2795218.2795225","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

代表性数据为用户提供了对其潜在的大型查询结果的简要概述。近年来,分集最大化被作为一种生成高覆盖、低冗余的代表性数据的技术。正交,遗憾最小化已经成为另一种技术,以产生具有高效用的代表性数据,满足用户的偏好。然而,在现实中,用户通常对数据的某些维度有一些预先指定的偏好,同时期望对其他维度有良好的覆盖。在这种需求的激励下,我们提出了一种名为ReDi的新方案,旨在生成具有代表性的数据,平衡遗憾最小化和多样性最大化之间的权衡。ReDi是基于一个混合目标函数,结合了遗憾和多样性。此外,它还采用了一些算法来最大化目标函数。我们进行了广泛的实验评估,以衡量不同的ReDi算法提供的有效性和效率之间的权衡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Diversifying with Few Regrets, But too Few to Mention
Representative data provide users with a concise overview of their potentially large query results. Recently, diversity maximization has been adopted as one technique to generate representative data with high coverage and low redundancy. Orthogonally, regret minimization has emerged as another technique to generate representative data with high utility that satisfy the user's preference. In reality, however, users typically have some pre-specified preferences over some dimensions of the data, while expecting good coverage over the other dimensions. Motivated by that need, in this work we propose a novel scheme called ReDi, which aims to generate representative data that balance the tradeoff between regret minimization and diversity maximization. ReDi is based on a hybrid objective function that combines both regret and diversity. Additionally, it employs several algorithms that are designed to maximize that objective function. We perform extensive experimental evaluation to measure the tradeoff between the effectiveness and efficiency provided by the different ReDi algorithms.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Data Like This: Ranked Search of Genomic Data Vision Paper Diversifying with Few Regrets, But too Few to Mention Principled Optimization Frameworks for Query Reformulation of Database Queries Preferential Diversity Method of Complex Event Processing over XML Streams
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1