磁共振胰胆管造影与内镜逆行胰胆管造影诊断梗阻性胆道病的准确性比较

Muhammad Ayub Naich, Sagheer Hussain, Hina Zamir, Adeel Qamar, F. Cheema, Z. Mustafa
{"title":"磁共振胰胆管造影与内镜逆行胰胆管造影诊断梗阻性胆道病的准确性比较","authors":"Muhammad Ayub Naich, Sagheer Hussain, Hina Zamir, Adeel Qamar, F. Cheema, Z. Mustafa","doi":"10.53350/pjmhs221610251","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To determine the diagnostic accuracy of magnetic-resonance-cholangio-pancreatography (MRCP) in diagnosis of obstructive biliopathy in comparison to endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography (ERCP) taking as gold standard. Study design: It is a cross sectional study. Place and duration of study: Study was conducted on the patients admitted in the gastroenterology department of Sir Ganga Ram Hospital Lahore. Study was completed in six months duration from January 2022 to June 2022. Methodology: Patients with the suspicion of obstructive biliopathies requiring ERCP were included in this study. Study sample was divided into two groups, in one group ERCP was done while other group underwent MRCP. Resulst of both techniques were reviewed by radiologist and gastroenterologist and compared with each other considering ERCP as gold standard. P-value <0.05 was considered statistically significance. Confidence interval was 95%. Results: Total 130 cases were divided into two groups with equal number of 65 patients in each. There were 75(57.6%) female and 55(42.3%) male cases. Mean age of the patients was 43.7± 3.5 years. Sensitivity of MRCP for obstructive biliopathies was 92.4%, specificity 90.7%, positive predictive value 88.3% and negative predictive value 89.2%. Conclusion: MRCP is a non-invasive investigation of choice in obstructive biliopathies having high diagnostic accuracy avoiding unnecessary complications of ERCPs. Keywords: MRCP, ERCP, Obstructive Biliopathy, CBD Stone, Stricture","PeriodicalId":296492,"journal":{"name":"Pakistan Journal of Medical &amp; Health Sciences","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diagnostic Accuracy of Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography in Comparison to Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography in Obstructive Biliopathy\",\"authors\":\"Muhammad Ayub Naich, Sagheer Hussain, Hina Zamir, Adeel Qamar, F. Cheema, Z. Mustafa\",\"doi\":\"10.53350/pjmhs221610251\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: To determine the diagnostic accuracy of magnetic-resonance-cholangio-pancreatography (MRCP) in diagnosis of obstructive biliopathy in comparison to endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography (ERCP) taking as gold standard. Study design: It is a cross sectional study. Place and duration of study: Study was conducted on the patients admitted in the gastroenterology department of Sir Ganga Ram Hospital Lahore. Study was completed in six months duration from January 2022 to June 2022. Methodology: Patients with the suspicion of obstructive biliopathies requiring ERCP were included in this study. Study sample was divided into two groups, in one group ERCP was done while other group underwent MRCP. Resulst of both techniques were reviewed by radiologist and gastroenterologist and compared with each other considering ERCP as gold standard. P-value <0.05 was considered statistically significance. Confidence interval was 95%. Results: Total 130 cases were divided into two groups with equal number of 65 patients in each. There were 75(57.6%) female and 55(42.3%) male cases. Mean age of the patients was 43.7± 3.5 years. Sensitivity of MRCP for obstructive biliopathies was 92.4%, specificity 90.7%, positive predictive value 88.3% and negative predictive value 89.2%. Conclusion: MRCP is a non-invasive investigation of choice in obstructive biliopathies having high diagnostic accuracy avoiding unnecessary complications of ERCPs. Keywords: MRCP, ERCP, Obstructive Biliopathy, CBD Stone, Stricture\",\"PeriodicalId\":296492,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pakistan Journal of Medical &amp; Health Sciences\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pakistan Journal of Medical &amp; Health Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.53350/pjmhs221610251\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pakistan Journal of Medical &amp; Health Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53350/pjmhs221610251","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:比较磁共振胆管胰图(MRCP)与以内镜逆行胆管胰图(ERCP)为金标准诊断梗阻性胆道病的准确性。研究设计:本研究为横断面研究。研究地点和时间:研究对象为拉合尔Sir Ganga Ram医院消化内科收治的患者。研究在2022年1月至2022年6月的六个月内完成。方法:怀疑梗阻性胆道病变需要ERCP的患者纳入本研究。研究样本分为两组,一组行ERCP,另一组行MRCP。以ERCP为金标准,由放射科医师和胃肠科医师对两种技术的结果进行了回顾和比较。p值<0.05为差异有统计学意义。置信区间为95%。结果:130例患者分为两组,每组65例。女性75例(57.6%),男性55例(42.3%)。患者平均年龄43.7±3.5岁。MRCP对梗阻性胆道病变的敏感性为92.4%,特异性为90.7%,阳性预测值为88.3%,阴性预测值为89.2%。结论:MRCP对梗阻性胆道疾病的诊断准确性高,避免了ercp不必要的并发症,是一种无创的选择。关键词:MRCP, ERCP,梗阻性胆道病,CBD结石,狭窄
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Diagnostic Accuracy of Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography in Comparison to Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography in Obstructive Biliopathy
Objective: To determine the diagnostic accuracy of magnetic-resonance-cholangio-pancreatography (MRCP) in diagnosis of obstructive biliopathy in comparison to endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography (ERCP) taking as gold standard. Study design: It is a cross sectional study. Place and duration of study: Study was conducted on the patients admitted in the gastroenterology department of Sir Ganga Ram Hospital Lahore. Study was completed in six months duration from January 2022 to June 2022. Methodology: Patients with the suspicion of obstructive biliopathies requiring ERCP were included in this study. Study sample was divided into two groups, in one group ERCP was done while other group underwent MRCP. Resulst of both techniques were reviewed by radiologist and gastroenterologist and compared with each other considering ERCP as gold standard. P-value <0.05 was considered statistically significance. Confidence interval was 95%. Results: Total 130 cases were divided into two groups with equal number of 65 patients in each. There were 75(57.6%) female and 55(42.3%) male cases. Mean age of the patients was 43.7± 3.5 years. Sensitivity of MRCP for obstructive biliopathies was 92.4%, specificity 90.7%, positive predictive value 88.3% and negative predictive value 89.2%. Conclusion: MRCP is a non-invasive investigation of choice in obstructive biliopathies having high diagnostic accuracy avoiding unnecessary complications of ERCPs. Keywords: MRCP, ERCP, Obstructive Biliopathy, CBD Stone, Stricture
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
An Audit of Injuries Sustained in Two–Wheeler Accidents in the Metropolitan City of Karachi, Pakistan Real World Data about the Characteristics of Adult Diabetes Mellitus Patients Visiting Outpatient Department of a Tertiary Care Hospital Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial to Examine the Efficacy of Oral Midazolam in Post Operative Pain Reduction in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Effect of Low Dose (100mg/kg) of Zinc Telluride (ZnTe) on Hematology of Male Albino Mice (Mus musculus) Evaluation of Diagnostic Accuracy of Typhidot Test Against Blood Culture in Diagnosis of Enteric Fever
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1