更好地理解不同的计算学科

Randy W. Connolly, B. Lunt, Janet Miller, L. Powell
{"title":"更好地理解不同的计算学科","authors":"Randy W. Connolly, B. Lunt, Janet Miller, L. Powell","doi":"10.1145/2808006.2808016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The field of computing has undergone significant differentiation over the past twenty years, resulting in several distinct computing sub-disciplines. After extensive consultation with experts and industry stakeholders, the ACM [1] defined five distinct sub-disciplines within the computing field: computer science (CS), information systems (IS), computer engineering (CE), software engineering (SE), and Information technology (IT). While these areas are unique, they are not completely discrete, and there seems to be ambiguity around which tasks fit into which sub-discipline. The ACM has made significant efforts to define these in terms of expected program content and by the outcomes and skills required to prepare students for the dynamic labor market. Nonetheless, research [4,5,6,9] shows that there is a need for an even clearer understanding of these sub-disciplines by the academic community, by guidance and career counsellors, and by, of course, prospective students. This panel will address some of the issues and problems involved with communicating how the computing disciplines overlap and diverge. The panelists straddle several computing disciplines as well as provide insight into the advising issues faced by non-computing guidance and career counsellors. We hope that through a lively dialog between the audience and the panelists, all participants will come away with improved understanding and techniques for communicating the differences between the different computing disciplines","PeriodicalId":431742,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 16th Annual Conference on Information Technology Education","volume":"330 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Towards a Better Understanding of the Different Computing Disciplines\",\"authors\":\"Randy W. Connolly, B. Lunt, Janet Miller, L. Powell\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/2808006.2808016\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The field of computing has undergone significant differentiation over the past twenty years, resulting in several distinct computing sub-disciplines. After extensive consultation with experts and industry stakeholders, the ACM [1] defined five distinct sub-disciplines within the computing field: computer science (CS), information systems (IS), computer engineering (CE), software engineering (SE), and Information technology (IT). While these areas are unique, they are not completely discrete, and there seems to be ambiguity around which tasks fit into which sub-discipline. The ACM has made significant efforts to define these in terms of expected program content and by the outcomes and skills required to prepare students for the dynamic labor market. Nonetheless, research [4,5,6,9] shows that there is a need for an even clearer understanding of these sub-disciplines by the academic community, by guidance and career counsellors, and by, of course, prospective students. This panel will address some of the issues and problems involved with communicating how the computing disciplines overlap and diverge. The panelists straddle several computing disciplines as well as provide insight into the advising issues faced by non-computing guidance and career counsellors. We hope that through a lively dialog between the audience and the panelists, all participants will come away with improved understanding and techniques for communicating the differences between the different computing disciplines\",\"PeriodicalId\":431742,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 16th Annual Conference on Information Technology Education\",\"volume\":\"330 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-09-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 16th Annual Conference on Information Technology Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/2808006.2808016\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 16th Annual Conference on Information Technology Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2808006.2808016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在过去的二十年里,计算领域经历了显著的分化,产生了几个不同的计算子学科。在与专家和行业利益相关者广泛磋商后,ACM[1]在计算领域定义了五个不同的子学科:计算机科学(CS)、信息系统(IS)、计算机工程(CE)、软件工程(SE)和信息技术(IT)。虽然这些领域是独特的,但它们并不是完全离散的,并且在哪些任务适合哪个子学科方面似乎存在歧义。ACM已经做出了重大努力,根据预期的课程内容以及为学生准备动态劳动力市场所需的结果和技能来定义这些内容。尽管如此,研究[4,5,6,9]表明,学术界、指导和职业顾问,当然还有未来的学生,都需要对这些子学科有更清晰的了解。这个小组将讨论与交流计算学科如何重叠和分化有关的一些问题。小组成员跨越了多个计算机学科,并对非计算机指导和职业顾问所面临的咨询问题提供了见解。我们希望通过观众和小组成员之间的生动对话,所有参与者都能增进对不同计算学科之间差异的理解和交流技术
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Towards a Better Understanding of the Different Computing Disciplines
The field of computing has undergone significant differentiation over the past twenty years, resulting in several distinct computing sub-disciplines. After extensive consultation with experts and industry stakeholders, the ACM [1] defined five distinct sub-disciplines within the computing field: computer science (CS), information systems (IS), computer engineering (CE), software engineering (SE), and Information technology (IT). While these areas are unique, they are not completely discrete, and there seems to be ambiguity around which tasks fit into which sub-discipline. The ACM has made significant efforts to define these in terms of expected program content and by the outcomes and skills required to prepare students for the dynamic labor market. Nonetheless, research [4,5,6,9] shows that there is a need for an even clearer understanding of these sub-disciplines by the academic community, by guidance and career counsellors, and by, of course, prospective students. This panel will address some of the issues and problems involved with communicating how the computing disciplines overlap and diverge. The panelists straddle several computing disciplines as well as provide insight into the advising issues faced by non-computing guidance and career counsellors. We hope that through a lively dialog between the audience and the panelists, all participants will come away with improved understanding and techniques for communicating the differences between the different computing disciplines
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Programming in Scratch and Mathematics: Augmenting Your Geometry Curriculum, Today! Experiential Learning Business/Industry and Education Wants and Needs Session details: SIGITE Paper Session 2 The Cyber Education Project and IT IAS Curriculum The CCL-Parallax Programmable Badge: Learning with Low-Cost, Communicative Wearable Computers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1