患者对疼痛评估方法的看法

A. Verge, K. Mukhida
{"title":"患者对疼痛评估方法的看法","authors":"A. Verge, K. Mukhida","doi":"10.15273/dmj.vol46no2.10144","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Pain questionnaires often serve as an assessment tool for initial  consultations in chronic pain clinics. The Pain Management Unit (PMU) is a tertiary care centre in Halifax, Nova Scotia. A number of clinicians in the PMU have noted that some patients express that questionnaires are time consuming to complete and believe they are not used in a manner that is helpful to their health care. The effectiveness of questionnaire-based pain evaluation is an area of active research. Text-heavy questionnaires have been criticized for their reliance on literacy and for the format’s inability to facilitate patient self-expression. Other methods of assessing pain have been suggested, including those that use pictograms, photographs and technology. This study was designed to gauge patients’ opinions on the current pain assessment method used in the PMU. In addition, it aimed to evaluate if incorporating art and technology appealed to current patients. The ultimate goal of this study was to evaluate if improvements could be made to patients’ pain assessment experience. Thirty patients were interviewed following their initial consultation appointments at the PMU. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analyzed using NVivo Software to look for themes expressed by research participants. The study yielded a total of 20 different themes, such as repetition within the questionnaires, and the patient’s desire to incorporate different technologies such as an iPad or computer. Recommendations are proposed based on these themes to help guide the creation or modification of pain assessment tools.","PeriodicalId":293977,"journal":{"name":"Dalhousie Medical Journal","volume":"67 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patients' perspectives on methods of assessing pain\",\"authors\":\"A. Verge, K. Mukhida\",\"doi\":\"10.15273/dmj.vol46no2.10144\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Pain questionnaires often serve as an assessment tool for initial  consultations in chronic pain clinics. The Pain Management Unit (PMU) is a tertiary care centre in Halifax, Nova Scotia. A number of clinicians in the PMU have noted that some patients express that questionnaires are time consuming to complete and believe they are not used in a manner that is helpful to their health care. The effectiveness of questionnaire-based pain evaluation is an area of active research. Text-heavy questionnaires have been criticized for their reliance on literacy and for the format’s inability to facilitate patient self-expression. Other methods of assessing pain have been suggested, including those that use pictograms, photographs and technology. This study was designed to gauge patients’ opinions on the current pain assessment method used in the PMU. In addition, it aimed to evaluate if incorporating art and technology appealed to current patients. The ultimate goal of this study was to evaluate if improvements could be made to patients’ pain assessment experience. Thirty patients were interviewed following their initial consultation appointments at the PMU. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analyzed using NVivo Software to look for themes expressed by research participants. The study yielded a total of 20 different themes, such as repetition within the questionnaires, and the patient’s desire to incorporate different technologies such as an iPad or computer. Recommendations are proposed based on these themes to help guide the creation or modification of pain assessment tools.\",\"PeriodicalId\":293977,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dalhousie Medical Journal\",\"volume\":\"67 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-07-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dalhousie Medical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15273/dmj.vol46no2.10144\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dalhousie Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15273/dmj.vol46no2.10144","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

疼痛问卷通常作为慢性疼痛门诊初步咨询的评估工具。疼痛管理单位(PMU)是一个三级保健中心在哈利法克斯,新斯科舍省。PMU的一些临床医生注意到,一些病人表示填写调查表很耗时,并认为调查表的使用方式对他们的保健没有帮助。基于问卷的疼痛评估的有效性是一个活跃的研究领域。大量文本的调查问卷被批评为依赖识字和格式无法促进患者的自我表达。人们还提出了其他评估疼痛的方法,包括使用象形图、照片和技术的方法。本研究旨在评估患者对PMU目前使用的疼痛评估方法的看法。此外,它还旨在评估将艺术和技术结合起来是否对目前的患者有吸引力。本研究的最终目的是评估是否可以改善患者的疼痛评估体验。30名患者在PMU进行首次咨询预约后接受了采访。访谈被逐字记录下来,并使用NVivo软件进行分析,以寻找研究参与者表达的主题。这项研究总共产生了20个不同的主题,比如问卷中的重复,以及患者对iPad或电脑等不同技术的渴望。根据这些主题提出建议,以帮助指导疼痛评估工具的创建或修改。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Patients' perspectives on methods of assessing pain
Pain questionnaires often serve as an assessment tool for initial  consultations in chronic pain clinics. The Pain Management Unit (PMU) is a tertiary care centre in Halifax, Nova Scotia. A number of clinicians in the PMU have noted that some patients express that questionnaires are time consuming to complete and believe they are not used in a manner that is helpful to their health care. The effectiveness of questionnaire-based pain evaluation is an area of active research. Text-heavy questionnaires have been criticized for their reliance on literacy and for the format’s inability to facilitate patient self-expression. Other methods of assessing pain have been suggested, including those that use pictograms, photographs and technology. This study was designed to gauge patients’ opinions on the current pain assessment method used in the PMU. In addition, it aimed to evaluate if incorporating art and technology appealed to current patients. The ultimate goal of this study was to evaluate if improvements could be made to patients’ pain assessment experience. Thirty patients were interviewed following their initial consultation appointments at the PMU. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analyzed using NVivo Software to look for themes expressed by research participants. The study yielded a total of 20 different themes, such as repetition within the questionnaires, and the patient’s desire to incorporate different technologies such as an iPad or computer. Recommendations are proposed based on these themes to help guide the creation or modification of pain assessment tools.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Hackathons within medical education: Promoting cutting-edge innovation in surgery The association between gestational age at delivery and neonatal abstinence syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis Two for the price of one: The benefits of job sharing to increase women representation in surgical specialties Cutting edge hackathon competition winners strive to better support more surgeons with primary childcare responsibilities A discussion of contemporary platforms for women in surgery
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1