Josephine Lamp, Carlos E. Rubio-Medrano, Ziming Zhao, Gail-Joon Ahn
{"title":"ExSol","authors":"Josephine Lamp, Carlos E. Rubio-Medrano, Ziming Zhao, Gail-Joon Ahn","doi":"10.1145/3428156","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"No longer just prophesied about, cyber-attacks to Energy Delivery Systems (EDS) (e.g., the power grid, gas and oil industries) are now very real dangers that result in non-trivial economical losses and inconveniences to modern societies. In such a context, risk analysis has been proposed as a valuable way to identify, analyze, and mitigate potential vulnerabilities, threats, and attack vectors. However, performing risk analysis for EDS is difficult due to their innate structural diversity and interdependencies, along with an always-increasing threatscape. Therefore, there is a need for a methodology to evaluate the current system state, identify vulnerabilities, and qualify risk at multiple granularities in a collaborative manner among different actors in the context of EDS. With this in mind, this article presents ExSol, a collaborative, real-time, risk assessment ecosystem that features an approach for modeling real-life EDS infrastructures, an ontology traversal technique that retrieves well-defined security requirements from well-reputed documents on cyber-protection for EDS infrastructures, as well as a methodology for calculating risk for a single asset and for an entire system. Moreover, we also provide experimental evidence involving a series of attack scenarios in both simulated and real-world EDS environments, which ultimately encourage the adoption of ExSol in practice.","PeriodicalId":202552,"journal":{"name":"Digital Threats: Research and Practice","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digital Threats: Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3428156","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对能源输送系统(EDS)(例如,电网、天然气和石油工业)的网络攻击不再只是预言,现在是非常现实的危险,会给现代社会造成不小的经济损失和不便。在这种情况下,风险分析被认为是识别、分析和减轻潜在漏洞、威胁和攻击向量的一种有价值的方法。然而,由于其固有的结构多样性和相互依赖性,以及不断增加的威胁,对EDS进行风险分析是困难的。因此,需要一种方法来评估当前系统状态,识别漏洞,并在EDS环境中以不同参与者之间的协作方式在多个粒度上限定风险。考虑到这一点,本文介绍了ExSol,这是一个协作的、实时的风险评估生态系统,其特点是建模现实生活中的EDS基础设施的方法,一种本体遍历技术,可以从EDS基础设施的网络保护方面的知名文档中检索定义良好的安全需求,以及计算单个资产和整个系统风险的方法。此外,我们还提供了在模拟和现实EDS环境中涉及一系列攻击场景的实验证据,最终鼓励在实践中采用ExSol。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
ExSol
No longer just prophesied about, cyber-attacks to Energy Delivery Systems (EDS) (e.g., the power grid, gas and oil industries) are now very real dangers that result in non-trivial economical losses and inconveniences to modern societies. In such a context, risk analysis has been proposed as a valuable way to identify, analyze, and mitigate potential vulnerabilities, threats, and attack vectors. However, performing risk analysis for EDS is difficult due to their innate structural diversity and interdependencies, along with an always-increasing threatscape. Therefore, there is a need for a methodology to evaluate the current system state, identify vulnerabilities, and qualify risk at multiple granularities in a collaborative manner among different actors in the context of EDS. With this in mind, this article presents ExSol, a collaborative, real-time, risk assessment ecosystem that features an approach for modeling real-life EDS infrastructures, an ontology traversal technique that retrieves well-defined security requirements from well-reputed documents on cyber-protection for EDS infrastructures, as well as a methodology for calculating risk for a single asset and for an entire system. Moreover, we also provide experimental evidence involving a series of attack scenarios in both simulated and real-world EDS environments, which ultimately encourage the adoption of ExSol in practice.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Causal Inconsistencies are Normal in Windows Memory Dumps (too) InvesTEE: A TEE-supported Framework for Lawful Remote Forensic Investigations Does Cyber Insurance promote Cyber Security Best Practice? An Analysis based on Insurance Application Forms Unveiling Cyber Threat Actors: A Hybrid Deep Learning Approach for Behavior-based Attribution A Framework for Enhancing Social Media Misinformation Detection with Topical-Tactics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1