{"title":"作为常识的物体理论","authors":"R. Routley","doi":"10.5840/GPS197991","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is beginning to be appreciated that the Meinong of the mainstream philosophical literature is a mythological figure, that Meinong’s philosophy has in fact been presented in an unfair fashion (perhaps even by largely sympathetic expositors such as Findlay 1963), and that the theory of objects in particular has been either widely misunderstood or else deliberately misrepresented.","PeriodicalId":326049,"journal":{"name":"Synthese Library","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1979-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The theory of objects as commonsense\",\"authors\":\"R. Routley\",\"doi\":\"10.5840/GPS197991\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"It is beginning to be appreciated that the Meinong of the mainstream philosophical literature is a mythological figure, that Meinong’s philosophy has in fact been presented in an unfair fashion (perhaps even by largely sympathetic expositors such as Findlay 1963), and that the theory of objects in particular has been either widely misunderstood or else deliberately misrepresented.\",\"PeriodicalId\":326049,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Synthese Library\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1979-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Synthese Library\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5840/GPS197991\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Synthese Library","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5840/GPS197991","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
It is beginning to be appreciated that the Meinong of the mainstream philosophical literature is a mythological figure, that Meinong’s philosophy has in fact been presented in an unfair fashion (perhaps even by largely sympathetic expositors such as Findlay 1963), and that the theory of objects in particular has been either widely misunderstood or else deliberately misrepresented.