{"title":"基于问题的研究是否能够丰富荷兰学校课程的内容?","authors":"H. Hoeken","doi":"10.5117/TVT2018.2.002.HOEK","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this contribution, I argue that the two aims Carel Jansen proposes, are incompatible. A research agenda dominated by questions derived from practical problems will lead to a body of largely isolated insights and unrelated knowledge. Such an incoherent knowledge base is insufficient to provide an enrichment of the school subject Dutch language. A more theory guided research agenda eliciting and guiding empirical research that meets high standards of ecological validity could lead to such a knowledge base.","PeriodicalId":192335,"journal":{"name":"Tijdschrift voor Taalbeheersing","volume":"88 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is probleemgestuurd onderzoek wel in staat om het schoolvak Nederlands inhoudelijk te verrijken?\",\"authors\":\"H. Hoeken\",\"doi\":\"10.5117/TVT2018.2.002.HOEK\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this contribution, I argue that the two aims Carel Jansen proposes, are incompatible. A research agenda dominated by questions derived from practical problems will lead to a body of largely isolated insights and unrelated knowledge. Such an incoherent knowledge base is insufficient to provide an enrichment of the school subject Dutch language. A more theory guided research agenda eliciting and guiding empirical research that meets high standards of ecological validity could lead to such a knowledge base.\",\"PeriodicalId\":192335,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tijdschrift voor Taalbeheersing\",\"volume\":\"88 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tijdschrift voor Taalbeheersing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5117/TVT2018.2.002.HOEK\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tijdschrift voor Taalbeheersing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5117/TVT2018.2.002.HOEK","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Is probleemgestuurd onderzoek wel in staat om het schoolvak Nederlands inhoudelijk te verrijken?
In this contribution, I argue that the two aims Carel Jansen proposes, are incompatible. A research agenda dominated by questions derived from practical problems will lead to a body of largely isolated insights and unrelated knowledge. Such an incoherent knowledge base is insufficient to provide an enrichment of the school subject Dutch language. A more theory guided research agenda eliciting and guiding empirical research that meets high standards of ecological validity could lead to such a knowledge base.