{"title":"来自“外围”的教训:在性和性别地理上对抗盎格鲁地理霸权","authors":"M. Pitoňák","doi":"10.5212/rlagg.v.10.i2.0012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article has three aims. First, I discuss the existing inequalities within the systems of knowledge production dominated by “AngloAmerican” academia and critically examine the “EastWest” binary to show that sexuality and gender/feminist scholars in geography should learn from their deconstructive skills to overcome hegemonies erected by these binaries both in academia and the related geopolitical landscapes. Second, I critically discuss the concept of “Central and Eastern Europe” (CEE) which I do not intend to stabilize, and hold up a mirror to the various hegemonic misunderstandings that take the form of “homogenization”, “dehistoricization”, “isolation” or by ascribing “backwardness”, by which they effectively erase or overlook knowledges and contributions of “nonAngloAmerican” scholars often left “beyond translation.” Last, I concentrate on the discussion of the development of geographies of sexualities and gender/feminist thought in CEE geography and illustrate the challenges that scholars from different institutional and national contexts must still face. By this article, I attempt to stand for our/their recognition.","PeriodicalId":107371,"journal":{"name":"Revista Latino-americana de Geografia e Genero","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lições da ‘Periferia’: Contrariando a Hegemonia AngloGeográfica sobre as Geografias de Sexualidade e Gênero\",\"authors\":\"M. Pitoňák\",\"doi\":\"10.5212/rlagg.v.10.i2.0012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article has three aims. First, I discuss the existing inequalities within the systems of knowledge production dominated by “AngloAmerican” academia and critically examine the “EastWest” binary to show that sexuality and gender/feminist scholars in geography should learn from their deconstructive skills to overcome hegemonies erected by these binaries both in academia and the related geopolitical landscapes. Second, I critically discuss the concept of “Central and Eastern Europe” (CEE) which I do not intend to stabilize, and hold up a mirror to the various hegemonic misunderstandings that take the form of “homogenization”, “dehistoricization”, “isolation” or by ascribing “backwardness”, by which they effectively erase or overlook knowledges and contributions of “nonAngloAmerican” scholars often left “beyond translation.” Last, I concentrate on the discussion of the development of geographies of sexualities and gender/feminist thought in CEE geography and illustrate the challenges that scholars from different institutional and national contexts must still face. By this article, I attempt to stand for our/their recognition.\",\"PeriodicalId\":107371,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Latino-americana de Geografia e Genero\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Latino-americana de Geografia e Genero\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5212/rlagg.v.10.i2.0012\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Latino-americana de Geografia e Genero","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5212/rlagg.v.10.i2.0012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Lições da ‘Periferia’: Contrariando a Hegemonia AngloGeográfica sobre as Geografias de Sexualidade e Gênero
This article has three aims. First, I discuss the existing inequalities within the systems of knowledge production dominated by “AngloAmerican” academia and critically examine the “EastWest” binary to show that sexuality and gender/feminist scholars in geography should learn from their deconstructive skills to overcome hegemonies erected by these binaries both in academia and the related geopolitical landscapes. Second, I critically discuss the concept of “Central and Eastern Europe” (CEE) which I do not intend to stabilize, and hold up a mirror to the various hegemonic misunderstandings that take the form of “homogenization”, “dehistoricization”, “isolation” or by ascribing “backwardness”, by which they effectively erase or overlook knowledges and contributions of “nonAngloAmerican” scholars often left “beyond translation.” Last, I concentrate on the discussion of the development of geographies of sexualities and gender/feminist thought in CEE geography and illustrate the challenges that scholars from different institutional and national contexts must still face. By this article, I attempt to stand for our/their recognition.