协同搜索

Fabian J. Sting, Jürgen Mihm, C. Loch
{"title":"协同搜索","authors":"Fabian J. Sting, Jürgen Mihm, C. Loch","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1850607","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Collaborative search, i.e., the process in which organizational members jointly contribute content to solve a non-trivial problem, is a common phenomenon in new product development organizations. In examining organizational problem solving, research has however neglected collaborative search processes, and has instead focused on coordination -- making separately contributed partial solution mutually compatible. This paper contributes towards a theory of collaborative search. We identify the organizational contingencies for which collaboration is beneficial, provide guidance on when collaboration does not improve performance, and identify methods for making collaboration effective.","PeriodicalId":122208,"journal":{"name":"INSEAD Working Paper Series","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Collaborative Search\",\"authors\":\"Fabian J. Sting, Jürgen Mihm, C. Loch\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.1850607\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Collaborative search, i.e., the process in which organizational members jointly contribute content to solve a non-trivial problem, is a common phenomenon in new product development organizations. In examining organizational problem solving, research has however neglected collaborative search processes, and has instead focused on coordination -- making separately contributed partial solution mutually compatible. This paper contributes towards a theory of collaborative search. We identify the organizational contingencies for which collaboration is beneficial, provide guidance on when collaboration does not improve performance, and identify methods for making collaboration effective.\",\"PeriodicalId\":122208,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"INSEAD Working Paper Series\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-09-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"INSEAD Working Paper Series\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1850607\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"INSEAD Working Paper Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1850607","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

协同搜索,即组织成员共同贡献内容以解决一个重要问题的过程,是新产品开发组织中的常见现象。然而,在研究组织问题解决方案时,研究忽略了协作搜索过程,而是专注于协调——使单独贡献的部分解决方案相互兼容。本文提出了一种协同搜索理论。我们确定协作是有益的组织偶发事件,就协作何时不能提高性能提供指导,并确定使协作有效的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Collaborative Search
Collaborative search, i.e., the process in which organizational members jointly contribute content to solve a non-trivial problem, is a common phenomenon in new product development organizations. In examining organizational problem solving, research has however neglected collaborative search processes, and has instead focused on coordination -- making separately contributed partial solution mutually compatible. This paper contributes towards a theory of collaborative search. We identify the organizational contingencies for which collaboration is beneficial, provide guidance on when collaboration does not improve performance, and identify methods for making collaboration effective.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Thermodynamics and Gradient Manipulation Mechanism in Entrepreneurial Actions Leading a Board of Directors in The United Kingdom: Indirect Leadership Curbing the Opioid Epidemic at its Root: The Effect of Provider Discordance after Opioid Initiation A Study on Construction of an Investment Portfolio Using Fundamental Analysis Explaining the Erosion of Relational Care Continuity: An Empirical Analysis of Primary Care in England
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1