动态手势识别中两种臂戴设备放置位置的比较

K. Kefer, Clemens Holzmann, R. Findling
{"title":"动态手势识别中两种臂戴设备放置位置的比较","authors":"K. Kefer, Clemens Holzmann, R. Findling","doi":"10.1145/3007120.3007146","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Dynamic hand gestures have become increasingly popular as an input modality for interactive systems. There exists a variety of arm-worn devices for the recognition of hand gestures, which differ not only in their capabilities, but also in the arm positions where they are worn. The aim of this paper is to investigate the effect of placement of such devices on the accuracy for recognizing dynamic hand gestures (e.g. waving the hand). This is relevant as different devices require different positions and thus differ in the achievable recognition accuracy. We have chosen two positions on the forearm: on the wrist and right below the elbow. These positions are interesing as smartwatches are usually worn on the wrist and devices using EMG sensors for the detection of static hand gestures (e.g. spreading the fingers) have to be worn right below the elbow. We used an LG G Watch worn on the wrist and a Myo armband from Thalmic Labs worn below the elbow. Both are equipped with three-axis accelerometers, which we used for gesture recognition. Our hypothesis was that the wrist-worn device would have a better recognition accuracy, as dynamic hand gestures have a bigger action radius on the wrist and therefore lead to bigger acceleration values. We conducted a comparative study with nine participants that performed eight simple, dynamic gestures on both devices. We tested the 4320 gesture samples with different classifiers and feature sets. Although the recognition results for the wrist-worn device were higher, the difference was not significant due to the substantial variation across participants.","PeriodicalId":394387,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Advances in Mobile Computing and Multi Media","volume":"139 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing the Placement of Two Arm-Worn Devices for Recognizing Dynamic Hand Gestures\",\"authors\":\"K. Kefer, Clemens Holzmann, R. Findling\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3007120.3007146\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Dynamic hand gestures have become increasingly popular as an input modality for interactive systems. There exists a variety of arm-worn devices for the recognition of hand gestures, which differ not only in their capabilities, but also in the arm positions where they are worn. The aim of this paper is to investigate the effect of placement of such devices on the accuracy for recognizing dynamic hand gestures (e.g. waving the hand). This is relevant as different devices require different positions and thus differ in the achievable recognition accuracy. We have chosen two positions on the forearm: on the wrist and right below the elbow. These positions are interesing as smartwatches are usually worn on the wrist and devices using EMG sensors for the detection of static hand gestures (e.g. spreading the fingers) have to be worn right below the elbow. We used an LG G Watch worn on the wrist and a Myo armband from Thalmic Labs worn below the elbow. Both are equipped with three-axis accelerometers, which we used for gesture recognition. Our hypothesis was that the wrist-worn device would have a better recognition accuracy, as dynamic hand gestures have a bigger action radius on the wrist and therefore lead to bigger acceleration values. We conducted a comparative study with nine participants that performed eight simple, dynamic gestures on both devices. We tested the 4320 gesture samples with different classifiers and feature sets. Although the recognition results for the wrist-worn device were higher, the difference was not significant due to the substantial variation across participants.\",\"PeriodicalId\":394387,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Advances in Mobile Computing and Multi Media\",\"volume\":\"139 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-11-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Advances in Mobile Computing and Multi Media\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3007120.3007146\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Advances in Mobile Computing and Multi Media","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3007120.3007146","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

作为交互系统的一种输入方式,动态手势已经变得越来越流行。现在有各种各样的用于识别手势的手臂设备,它们不仅功能不同,而且佩戴的手臂位置也不同。本文的目的是研究这些设备的放置对识别动态手势(如挥手)准确性的影响。这是相关的,因为不同的设备需要不同的位置,因此在可实现的识别精度不同。我们在前臂上选择了两个位置:手腕和肘部正下方。这些姿势很有趣,因为智能手表通常戴在手腕上,而使用肌电传感器检测静态手势(例如展开手指)的设备必须戴在肘部下方。我们使用了一个戴在手腕上的LG G手表和一个戴在肘部以下的来自Thalmic Labs的Myo臂带。两者都配备了三轴加速度计,我们用它来进行手势识别。我们的假设是,手腕设备会有更好的识别精度,因为动态手势在手腕上有更大的动作半径,因此会导致更大的加速度值。我们对九名参与者进行了比较研究,他们在两个设备上都做了八种简单的动态手势。我们用不同的分类器和特征集测试了4320个手势样本。尽管腕带设备的识别结果更高,但由于参与者之间存在很大差异,差异并不显著。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparing the Placement of Two Arm-Worn Devices for Recognizing Dynamic Hand Gestures
Dynamic hand gestures have become increasingly popular as an input modality for interactive systems. There exists a variety of arm-worn devices for the recognition of hand gestures, which differ not only in their capabilities, but also in the arm positions where they are worn. The aim of this paper is to investigate the effect of placement of such devices on the accuracy for recognizing dynamic hand gestures (e.g. waving the hand). This is relevant as different devices require different positions and thus differ in the achievable recognition accuracy. We have chosen two positions on the forearm: on the wrist and right below the elbow. These positions are interesing as smartwatches are usually worn on the wrist and devices using EMG sensors for the detection of static hand gestures (e.g. spreading the fingers) have to be worn right below the elbow. We used an LG G Watch worn on the wrist and a Myo armband from Thalmic Labs worn below the elbow. Both are equipped with three-axis accelerometers, which we used for gesture recognition. Our hypothesis was that the wrist-worn device would have a better recognition accuracy, as dynamic hand gestures have a bigger action radius on the wrist and therefore lead to bigger acceleration values. We conducted a comparative study with nine participants that performed eight simple, dynamic gestures on both devices. We tested the 4320 gesture samples with different classifiers and feature sets. Although the recognition results for the wrist-worn device were higher, the difference was not significant due to the substantial variation across participants.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Remote Application Control Technology and Implementation of HTML5-based Smart TV Platform Robot Enabled Service Personalisation Based On Emotion Feedback Differentially Private Moving Object Database Publication in Location Tracking Service A mobile distributed system for remote resource access A two-layer security model for accessing multimedia content in social networks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1